Apple iPod Classic

By Derek Fung on 25 September 2007

The name suggests more of the same but with more space and better value. Hard disk lag issues, video out controversy and just okay sound stop it from being a true classic though.

7.4 7.6
  • Good: Huge storage (who really has 40,000 songs?) • Good value • Anodised aluminium front feels like quality • Video and photos are bright and clear • Interface looks even slicker than ever ...
  • Bad: ... but marred by hard disk lag issues • Sound quality still, at best, mediocre • Cover Flow a case of form over function • New accessories required for video out
  • Specs: Hard disk • 80GB • 320 x 240 pixels • Yes • See more specifications
  • RRP: AU$349.00

Note: At its September 2008 iPod event, Apple announced that the 80GB and 160GB Classic models were being discontinued in favour of a single 120GB player. This version retails for AU$339.

Design
When Steve Jobs decreed that the full-size iPod needed an appellation like its siblings the Touch, nano and Shuffle, it meant that all of the changes to the sixth-generation full-size iPod would be relatively subtle ones. There's no drastic change in the shape -- like the Shuffle's transfiguration from a USB key to a trendoid belt clip, or the nano's from an aluminium candy bar into a shrunk-in-the-wash iPod. Despite the bigger hard disk capacities -- 80GB and a bigger-than-Ben-Hur 160GB -- the new iPod is slimmer than the just-departed 30GB and 80GB models. Oh, and if you put old and new side-by-side, you'll notice that it's also slightly taller than before.

When we first heard that the latest iPod was being fitted with an anodised aluminium shell, our hearts sang in hope that it would be akin to the one-piece affair seen on the second-gen nano. Alas, it wasn't to be. The lightly curved and (sorta) scratch-proof aluminium is used only on the front plate -- bye bye, glossy plastic! -- with the shiny back returning for more fingerprint-taking and scratch-making action. The changes give the iPod a greater sense of solidity and quality. Pity then that in Apple's quest for the feel-good factor, it hasn't fitted this iPod with a scratch-proof screen and the Click Wheel was looking decidedly worn out after just a week.

What do you think of Apple's decision to disable video out from the headphone jack and up the price of its video cables?

Vote View Votes

Nanos and Shuffles are available in a veritable rainbow of colours, but the Classic has just two against its name: silver and black. Almost every other external element remains unchanged. There's a 320 x 240 2.5-inch screen, a hold switch and 3.5mm headphone jack along the top and the proprietary connector on the bottom.

Apple has tweaked the iPod's interface for the first time in, well, forever with the introduction of a preview pane. It splits the screen in half, with the traditional iPod menu on the left and a panning preview of your assortment of album art, video stills or photos on the right. As eye candy, it's almost as good as a platter full of Belgian dark chocolate. Unfortunately, this all comes at a price ... and it's not to your waist line. There's often a delay of up to three seconds, as the Classic's hard disk powers up and finds an appropriate thumbnail or still, during which time the iPod is completely frozen. It makes scrolling through anywhere where thumbnails are used an incredibly frustrating, not to mention hit-and-miss, affair. At least with your time-outs you can admire the much improved anti-aliased text.

Cover Flow, first seen on the iPhone and iPod Touch, also suffers from this hard disk lag issue. Although flicking through album art is undeniably cool, we're not so sure that it's a more effective way of searching for music. The cool factor drops off precipitously if you don't have much in the way of cover art. While we're at it, we bemoan Apple's decision to use a generic album cover, instead of just plain text, for tracks without cover art.

Note: Apple released a fix patch for the Classic via iTunes over the weekend, well after we had returned our review unit. According to chatter on Internet forums, the patch hasn't fixed the lag problem. We'll keep you posted on the issue.

The 2007 iPods:

Features
Unlike many other MP3 players out there, Apple has resisted making features like voice recording and an FM tuner standard. That's the case with the sixth-gen iPod and with the iPod still dominating the market, looks set to be so for the foreseeable future.

In addition to playing music and videos -- more on that later -- the guys and gals from Cupertino have spruced up the bundled Solitaire and Music Quiz games. They've also added a circular version of the classic Pong, and the ability to purchase more games through iTunes. All bar the Music Quiz are enjoyable ways of passing time on public transport while listening to music.

Of greater importance to many is the fact that the new iPod can pump video to your TV in either 480p (NTSC) or 576p (PAL). There's a price to be paid for this, though. TV output via the headphone jack has now been disabled, as has video output through docking devices without an Apple authorisation chip. This spells trouble for those who are thinking of upgrading but already have equipment compatible with previous video iPods -- be it a AU$29 composite cable or AU$1,300 Philips SoundBar. Making matters worse is the steep price (AU$79) Apple is charging for composite and component cables compatible with the new nano and Classic.

Goodies:

Performance
An iPod tradition that's carried on with the Classic is the less than stellar audio quality -- and that's not only when you're hooked up via the standard white earbuds. On the Flaming Lips' "Waiting for Superman" the bass was sufficiently loud but was flat and without any real kick. This sense of flatness was heard time and time again with all manner of instrumentation, from acoustic guitars to mandolins and xylophones. Vocals also sound a little hollow and are easily drowned out as the output volume increases. Combined, it results in a listening experience that's okay but is quite tiring if you have to turn the volume up to, say, counter the noise on public transport. Video, however, was a far more pleasant experience. The screen proved to be bright and the colours nicely saturated, although with its smaller screen dimensions (2-inches versus 2.5) the nano is better in this regard. The Classic's also got enough processing grunt to handle action scenes without artefacts ruining the day. For the reasons stated above, we weren't able to test out how the Classic fared when connected to a TV.

Battery performance should be in the same ballpark as the claimed figures -- 30 hours of music and five hours of video for 80GB, with 40 hours and seven hours for the 160GB. We managed two solid days of music playing, as well as a few hours of playing Solitaire and watching video.

Although we're pretty certain that Apple will get around to fixing the hard disk lag issue in the future, it's a pretty obvious bug to overlook and mars Apple's reputation for ease-of-use and design panache. Also distressing is the video out issue, which on the face of it seems like a case of price gouging. Overall, though, the new iPod is good value at AU$349 for the 80GB unit and AU$479 for the 160GB model. We just wouldn't buy it if we already had a suite of iPod video accessories or were fussy about sound.

Topics: apple, ipod, classic, mp3 player, music, lib, cms, admin, cache, error

Comments (29)

  • lia01 gave 10/10 on 13/04/2009 21:41 Report abuse

    Well, if you like music over gadget, get this. if You would prefer something to play with, get the touch for the same money

    • Good: New Cover Flow. space. Put everything on.
    • Bad: at times laggy.
  • badbiki gave a review on 12/04/2009 14:25 Report abuse

    Have nothing but problems with my 120GB gen 6 ipod classic. Skips tracks CONSTANLTY.. 5 times per track, random places in my 2 hour sets. Making this "player" more like a random junk box. useless for mp3 playing. great as a portable hdd.

    • Good: 120gb storage.
    • Bad: Skips constantly making it unusable for its intended purpose. No feed back from apple regarding these issues for over 1 yr.
  • bbyvivian gave 8/10 on 11/03/2009 16:39 Report abuse

    i own one, and i'd say i wouldn't regret buying it. its got loads of space for a good price. u wont be disappointed, but if ur more of a person who moves around and doesnt want something quite heavy in ur pockets, get a smaller ipod.

  • James Wyatt gave 1/10 on 03/02/2009 14:59 Report abuse

    I have purchased an Apple iPod Classic and have had nothing but problems with it...starting off with:

    - being railroaded (forced) into giving my credit card details to iTunes BEFORE i even made a purchase there.

    - being railroaded (forced) to use the highly unsatisfactory and amateur iTunes website to sync (download) my music, the far superior Windows Media Player being conveniently incompatible with my iPod Classic.

    - every time i sync (download) my music library from iTunes i get a completely different result. This would involve random variations of the following:
    - having all my tunes erased off my iPod.
    - always having a different selection of music downloaded, even though the library content HAS NOT CHANGED.
    - having new additions to the library not being synced (downloaded) into my iPod, even after appearing on my iTunes web page.

    This is the first time i have purchased through Apple, and to say i%u2019m highly dissatisfied is an understatement. I cannot believe that something so substandard and glitchy could possibly have ever been released onto the market and onto unsuspecting consumers. This is disgraceful behaviour from this corporate giant. Avoid Apple iPods at all costs, as this company has shown their contempt and disrespect of their own consumer base.

    • Good: Considering all the cons listed above, any pros are negligable.
    • Bad: Simply and honestly, untested rubbish from Apple
  • Max gave 4/10 on 12/01/2009 16:47 Report abuse

    Why oh why do i have to connect to iTunes and their rubbish online player and menus and why oh why do i need to be railroaded into giving all my credit card details BEFORE i have even made a purchase from iTunes???? Just plainly ridiculous!! If i knew this was the process, i would not have bought an iPod.

    • Good: Lots of storage space (the ONLY saving grace). Sound quality is great if you replace the cheap and incredibly nasty earplugs that you get after spending so much money.
    • Bad: Two dollar shop earplugs (honestly!!). Complete lack on being able to refine or alter your music (in any basic fashion) from the iPod itself - yep, you have to connect to Apple's less than satisfactory shitty website!! Not being able to access the graphic equaliser whilst i'm listening to music -what the????
  • Car gave 8/10 on 12/11/2008 15:13 Report abuse

    so if u get a radio transmitter does that allow the 120 gb ipod to have the radio when ur walking?

  • jeffster93 gave 9/10 on 06/11/2008 16:36 Report abuse

    I love this player! i too got this on a warranty from my old samsung player and am so pleased with the ipod classic its made me a mac fan boy!

    • Good: massive space for music and even movies,
      solid design and easy on the eye
    • Bad: a bit slow but overall one of the best and affordable players on the market
  • the_abyss gave 8/10 on 18/08/2008 17:21 Report abuse

    I got mine (80GB, black) as a warranty replacement my old Toshiba Gigabeat S30 last month. Was and still am very anti-iPod, but the classic's pretty much the only affordable storage solution. Although I only really needed around 30GB of storage, the classic's one of the few hard drive based players and is (relatively)CHEAP compared to the extortionate 32GB touch ($600?) so it was a no-brainer. Decent player, but a larger screen would have been nice - like on the Zune 80 that's not available in Australia.

    • Good: Pretty decent audio quality
      Great video playback if converted correctly (i recommend using the free 'SUPER' video encoder- can convert ANY video file: www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html)
      Tonnes of storage for the price - flash is still too expensive to be a viable alternative
      Nice styling
      Good battery life
      Nice size and weight- Nano is too small and squat and Touch is too large and expensive
    • Bad: No radio, but i think we've all given up asking for one now.
      Relatively small screen. 3" anyone?
      Back scratches too easily- so add around $20 for a case
      New model around the corner, hopefully. I only got mine as a replacement because i had to. Suggest waiting til next year, when most likely a new range will come out.
      iTunes still necessary to transfer music. I had to convert hundreds of WMA's.
  • sman gave 9/10 on 27/07/2008 13:42 Report abuse

    Abouslty great

    • Good: good screen, user interface
    • Bad: no FLV compatbility
  • mimimeh. gave 10/10 on 12/07/2008 14:20 Report abuse

    It's the best ipod out atm at a resonable price. best thing i brought an 80 gig for $314

    • Good: good ****
    • Bad: nufffin

Post your own

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

Where to buy Apple iPod Classic

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder