Apple iPod Nano (4th generation)

By Ella Morton on 19 September 2008

Cheaper, thinner, friendlier: the new Nano trumps its predecessors.

8.5 7.9
  • Good: Attractive all-in-one matte metallic design • Better menu with option to turn off graphics • Easier to operate one-handed than the third-gen model
  • Bad: Headphones and sound quality are the same as before • Thumb can feel a bit squished • Some features require the purchase of additional accessories
  • Specs: Flash • 8GB • 320 x 240 pixels • Yes • See more specifications
  • RRP: AU$199.00

It's cheaper, it's thinner and it's available in a rainbow of metallic colours for AU$199 (8GB) or AU$279 (16GB). Ladies and gentlemen, this is Nano number four.

Design
Apple's most popular music player has undergone yet another extreme makeover. In contrast to last year's compacted design, the Nano has been stretched back to the candybar footprint of its first and second generations. That doesn't mean that specs have gone backwards, however. The size and resolution of the display is the same as the third-gen's version at two inches (5.1 centimetres) and 320x240 pixels, but it's been rotated 90 degrees to fit the form factor. The Nano is now a few hairs thinner at 6.2 millimetres, and almost 12 grams lighter at a feathery 37g. It's available in eight vibrant metallic colours in all three capacities — a refreshing change from previous generations which offered a limited colour range for each variety of player.

As with the new Touch, things have been smoothed out since last year. The Nano now sports an elliptical cross section, meaning the screen has a slightly curved glass overlay. This makes the display slightly more reflective than previous models, but it's not a big deal and shouldn't interfere with photo viewing or video watching.

Instead of sporting a reflective — and scratch-prone — back, the Nano is wrapped in one piece of brushed aluminium. It's a more practical design for those who chuck their players in a bag or pocket with a ring full of keys nestled up close.

The placement of the scrollwheel seems very low due to the height of the player and its vertical screen orientation. The combination of this and the thinness of the wheel can make your thumb feel a little squished and awkward when navigating through lists. On the plus side, the hold switch that got inexplicably relocated to the base of the third-gen player has been restored to its rightful location at the top left.

Features
The split-screen menu that debuted on last year's iPods was pretty-looking, but it also made the text feel cramped — and there was no way to turn the floating images off. For its fourth-gen Nano, Apple offers up a different version. Instead of being vertically bisected, the menu screen displays album covers and images in a strip at the bottom. If that's still too much for you, you can revert to a vanilla text menu by turning off the "Preview Panel" option in the main menu settings. The user friendliness continues with a new font size option, which enlarges all text in the menus.

Cover Flow browsing turned up in the last Nano release, but this time there's an accelerometer involved. Tilting the Nano 90 degrees brings on a parade of album covers organised by artist. Scroll through them speedily and the first letter of each is displayed beneath the whizzing images.

The accelerometer also allows for a rather gimmicky feature: shake to shuffle. As with Sony Ericsson's W910i phone, moving the Nano rapidly up and down causes a random track to surface from the depths of your audio library. As with the W910i, the attribute is cute but largely pointless.

Another software change is the addition of Genius, a playlist-creation feature introduced in iTunes 8. Choose the Genius option when a song is playing and the pixies in the circuit boards will assemble a list of 25 tunes that share the mood of the original. Genius works better on higher capacity Classics and Touches, where there are more songs to choose from, but it's relatively effective on the Nano as long as your tastes don't run to the very obscure.

As with the new Touch, the voice recording feature can't be used without investing AU$48 in Apple's new mic-equipped ear buds. This inclusion of accessory-dependent features can be viewed in two ways: either Apple is being a tease and forcing you to spend more money, or they're being considerate by keeping things simple and assuming that not everyone will want to record audio.

Performance
A perennial complaint about Apple music players has been that for a range that exhibits exemplary design and innovative interfaces, the same level of care is not shown in the sound quality — at least when heard through the bundled basic headphones. Though Steve Jobs acknowledged the grumbles and announced a new set of silicon-tipped ear buds at the iPod media event in September, the Nano ships with the same set of buds that accompanied last year's model. As a result, audio is akin to what we described in our last Nano review: a little humdrum and flat.

Video, on the other hand, looks fantastic. Footage is smooth, vibrant and immersive — well, as immersive as you can get on a 2-inch screen. Being able to view photos in landscape mode — they rotate automatically when you turn the player — cuts down on the "squinting at a postage stamp" factor.

The fourth-gen Nano is the friendliest one yet, with more customisation options, a smudge-free back and a wafer-thin yet sturdy construction. Those who dug its squarish predecessor may get a bit of a shock at the layout, but it's ultimately easier to use than the third-gen release.

Topics: 4g, apple, ipod, nano, gen

Comments (55)

  • todddddd. gave 8/10 on 10/07/2009 00:05 Report abuse

    I've had my silver iPod nano for a couple of months now and i've been pretty happy with it. It froze while i was rewinding a video that i uploaded to it once but i just waited a till the next day for it to fo flat and i just recharged it. It's got a pretty crap battery life. Like, if you were just listening to music after you just recharged it and listened to the music till it goes flat, it would be flat within about 4 hours. And if you recharge it and then watch videos on it till it goes flat it would flat within around 2 hours. Which i think is pretty crap. But mostly i've been impressed.

    • Good: its small, light, looks cool, good grip(havnt dropped it and i drop things lol)
    • Bad: freezes often, crap battery life
  • dylan gave a review on 06/07/2009 10:44 Report abuse

    the only reason i have this is because it was a gift and my car has a stupid ipod jack. any other mp3 players with drag and drop function kill this peice of sh1t

    • Good: none
    • Bad: itunes, its apple, i could go on and on
  • zero gave a review on 15/05/2009 17:25 Report abuse

    jailbreaker... just turn off the shaker...

  • wolf gave a review on 12/05/2009 11:39 Report abuse

    sounds like im not sorry to have gone with a sony then....

  • LOZARULZ gave a review on 26/04/2009 13:38 Report abuse

    its mostly cool i use mine like everyday, ilv listening 2 muisc, mine has frozen and stuffed up a couple of times though, had 2 call apple 2 fix it, ive had mine 4-5 months overall its pretty cool

    • Good: Cool colours,cover flow, easy 2 control
    • Bad: frezzes
  • luda11 gave a review on 25/04/2009 20:57 Report abuse

    its aiight

    • Good: easy to use, good video plyr, small
    • Bad: crap battery, freezes alot, crap battery, cant use genius, crap battery, cant fit enough songs
  • :) gave a review on 16/04/2009 14:53 Report abuse

    I love it. I got it 4 xmas and it's awesome. I know some of u don't like the shake to shuffle but I really like it and it's especially good if you have thousands of songs and don't care which one you listen to. Also, I like Itunes and the battery life is really good, I don't know what u guys r complaining bout but maybe sometimes u get 1 with a good battery and some of them have shitty batteries but mine is really good. The sound quality is good 4 me but I don't know I don't really care as long as I can hear the music.

    • Good: shape, functions, the games are cool esp. maze, sound, battery, looks,the screen is awesome and picture quality is really good.
    • Bad: none
  • yvonniewah gave 8/10 on 01/04/2009 16:18 Report abuse

    got it for christmas - and love it, and optional engravings make them really nice and personal gifts

    • Good: design
      range of colours
      video quality
      light
      organization of the screen
      cover flow
    • Bad: sound quality - heavy bass and guitar becomes too much for those little earphones at times

      battery life
      video format - GODDAMIT ITS FRUSTRATING
  • John gave 4/10 on 31/03/2009 00:30 Report abuse

    The Sound quality on this 4th Gen Nano is just as bad as the 3rd Gen Nano. Believe it or not, my shuffle, 1st Gen has better quality sound than both of these Nanos.

    This is not because the head phones where bad quality, they are bad anyways, but I've plug them onto my Seinheiser Headset and the sound is still dull and falt. No highs and the lows muffle the base.

    Apple, need to match good design and also quality sound in one unit.

    • Good: Style, Vibrant Color, thiness.
    • Bad: Bad Bad Bad Bad Sound Quality.
  • BWT gave 9/10 on 14/03/2009 18:18 Report abuse

    This, is a fantastic little thing. It looks sexy, it works really well with iTunes, the menus are easy to use, and I still haven't found a better replacement. This is my third iPod.

    • Good: iTunes. It's really nice to have a program which allows to you to organize your music.
      The other thing I like is video. My last one was the 2nd gen, and I think it's pretty good quality, if a little small a screen. That is a small trade off for everything else.
    • Bad: I agree, the headphones are horrid, but i have a nice pair of Bose, so that's all good.

Post your own

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

Where to buy Apple iPod Nano (4th generation)

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder