Apple iPod Nano (6th generation)

The sixth generation of the iPod Nano is the smallest yet, but it comes at the expense of valuable features and practical controls.


7.0
CNET Rating
5.3
User Rating

View more from Apple »


The iPod Nano is an institution that rivals the iPod Classic in terms of legacy, and arguably exceeds it in popularity. It's a technological Goldilocks that has endured by virtue of how well it has held to the middle ground, always sitting right in the middle of Apple's other iPod offerings in terms of price, convenience, features and performance.

This time around, Apple went back to the drawing board for the sixth-generation Nano. The result, for better or worse, throws out many of the features we've come to expect from the Nano over the years, in exchange for a significantly smaller, clip-on design, available in seven anodised aluminium hues (silver, grey, blue, green, orange, red and pink). The iPod Nano will retail for AU$199 for the 8GB model (the same as the debut price for the previous generation) and AU$229 for the 16GB model (AU$20 less than the equivalent capacity model of the previous generation).

Design

We have to admit, we didn't think it was possible for Apple to make the Nano any smaller than what we saw in 2009. Boy, were we wrong. The Nano now measures approximately 4cm square and 0.8cm deep, including the spring-loaded metal clip borrowed from the iPod Shuffle. It's ridiculously small. It's "where the heck did I leave the iPod?" small. On a really bad day, it can also be "oh man, I hope I didn't run it through the washing machine" small.

Two circular buttons on the top edge of the Nano provide intuitive tactile control over volume adjustment; a larger oval-shaped button nearby acts as a sleep/wake control for the touchscreen. Yes, you heard right: the smallest iPod Nano ever produced uses the smallest touchscreen LCD we've ever seen, measuring about an inch square. On the bottom edge of the Nano you'll find Apple's standard 30-pin dock connection and a headphone jack compatible with standard headphones (included), as well as headsets with microphone and remote control capabilities (sold separately).

We have our criticisms of the new Nano design, but let's start out on a positive note. We have good things to say about the player's screen. The glass-covered LCD is bright and colourful, with a crisp 240x240-pixel resolution that packs 220 pixels per inch. The touchscreen is frighteningly responsive and fluid, rivalling the performance of the iPhone 4. The iOS-like icons used throughout the four scrollable home screens make sense, and they launch into their intended functions with lightning speed.

And though everyone I showed the Nano to had little problem locating and playing music, each of them regarded me with a look of confused betrayal when I asked them to return to the home screen. I may as well have handed them a toy finger trap. We've become so accustomed to having a home button on touchscreen devices, people leap into menus and features without considering how to get back. The iPod Nano borrows many of the touchscreen interface metaphors of the iPhone and iPod Touch, but does not include a home button or basic on-screen breadcrumb buttons to show users the way out.

Of course, like the finger trap metaphor, the solution is easier than it seems. You simply need to swipe left or hold your finger on the screen to return to the main menu. Once you learn the trick, it becomes second nature. Still, for a company that has set the bar for touchscreen interface design and usability standards with its iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch devices, the oversight of something as fundamental as a menu button seems out of step. Maybe it's not as big a deal as we're making it out to be, but we expect that Apple Store employees will be clocking in a lot of "face palm" hours when customers ask how to get back to the Nano's main menu.

The touchscreen presents users with a bigger, long-term issue, though: it requires concentration. Unlike the click wheel navigation used on all previous designs — which was literally shaped like a target for your fingers — the new Nano's touchscreen requires your eyes to interpret the on-screen navigation. Granted, the same can be said of the iPhone and iPod Touch, but the Nano's audio-specific features and intended use as a fitness accessory put it in a different context. With any of the previous designs, you could quickly start or stop music playback purely by feel, without taking your eyes from your activity. With the square touchscreen design, you need to glance at the screen to perform just about any operation, with the exception of adjusting volume, shuffling songs with a shake or simply yanking out the headphones to stop music playback.

Part of the playback control dilemma could have been solved if Apple had included ear buds with an inline remote control, instead of the basic ear buds that come bundled. You can buy a pair of these ear buds separately for AU$39, which also enable a hidden Voice Memo feature to the player. Sadly, even after laying out extra money, the ear buds with remote and mic are sonically identical to the basic ear buds.

Apple iPod NanoApple iPod NanoApple iPod NanoApple iPod Nano

Click through for a complete photo gallery. (Credit: Apple)

Features

Arguably, the Nano's most impressive feature is its size. Apple shrank the Nano's design by nearly 50 per cent while maintaining a 24-hour battery life, generous capacity options and existing features such as music playback, an FM radio you can pause, Genius Mixes, podcasts, audio books, photo gallery, clock, stopwatch, pedometer and support for the optional Nike+ fitness system. Apple has also added an integrated clip, which saves you from having to fork over money for an armband.

But as great as the Nano is from a design and engineering perspective, there are actually fewer total features being offered than any time over the past three years. Some of the features that didn't make it to the new design aren't worth crying over, such as contacts, calendar and notes. But Apple also gutted features like the alarm clock, which we've found handy on a few occasions. A countdown timer is included, which can be set to put the iPod to sleep or to sound an alarm through headphones or connected speakers. But with the previous model, you could set alarms at specific times, set them to repeat daily or weekly, associate the alarm to a playlist of music, and have any alarm or song play through the internal speaker.

Support for games is also gone. Again, this isn't a huge deal for most users, but it was a fun, well-executed feature that Apple had polished over the years. It was also one more small way to keep kids entertained on a road trip.

But the most surprising omission from the sixth-generation iPod Nano is the lack of video playback or camcorder features. Over the past three years, video has been the focus and area of growth for the Nano. The screen kept getting larger, movie rental capabilities came on-board, and the 2009 model was even graced with a useful little camcorder. All of those features have been tossed aside now. To be fair, watching video on a postage-stamp-size screen would be ridiculous. The larger question, though, is why Apple felt that going smaller with the design was a paramount concern over maintaining features it had taken years to develop.

Looking past our sentiment and confusion over the features that didn't make it into the new design, the Nano still has plenty to brag about. Thanks to some help from Apple's iTunes software, advanced playlist capabilities such as smart playlists, Genius playlists and Genius Mixes take a lot of the legwork out of creating a great soundtrack for your morning jog. Compatibility with iTunes also brings along one of the best and most convenient ways to download and manage podcasts and audio books.

The FM radio player, which was only added to the Nano in 2009, is one of the best you'll find on a portable device. With it you can pause and rewind up to 15 minutes of any live broadcast, as well as store your favourite stations as presets and tag songs from compatible stations, making it easy to purchase those songs when you sync back up to your computer.

We also have to admit, for all our gripes with the touchscreen navigation, the new interface does allow you to better customise the layout of the main menu. Like the iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad, you can rearrange the Nano's icons by holding them down and dragging them to a new location. If you're an audio-book or podcast fanatic who couldn't care less about Genius Mixes, you can make those features the only two icons on your main menu screen, placing other features out of the way.

The square touchscreen also allows you to reorient the menu in any direction, which can be helpful if you have the Nano clipped sideways on your shirtsleeve or upside down on a backpack strap. But again, the downside to such a flexible screen orientation is that it can be difficult to remember or predict how the controls are laid out without glancing directly at the screen. If you need to be able to pause or skip songs without taking your eyes of what you're doing, you'll just need to invest in some type of headphone remote control (or a different device).

Finally, there's the integrated pedometer, which can be used to track your activity and manage fitness goals. When you first activate the pedometer, it asks for your weight and allows you to set a "daily step goal". When the pedometer is switched on, it does an accurate job recording how many steps you take throughout your day and saves your totals in a history view, which you can sync to a Nike+ online account by way of iTunes. It's a useful feature, and it's free.

Performance

For better or worse, the Nano now has fewer features for us to evaluate in terms of performance. As we mentioned earlier, the Nano's touchscreen is technically dazzling in terms of its responsiveness and crisp resolution. Unfortunately, on a practical note, it performs no better than the click wheel when it comes to navigating through features or diving into your music library. Because the controls are dynamic and not fixed like the click wheel design, even the most basic operations, such as pausing or skipping music, require more attention than before.

Sonically, the Nano holds up to the higher standards we've heard from Apple in recent years. Provided you're quick to upgrade from the basic ear buds Apple bundles with the player, the fundamental sound quality of the Nano is hard to complain about. Background hiss introduced by the internal headphone amplifier is impossible to detect on modern digital recordings. Listening back on a pair of Klipsch Custom 2 earphones we were able to pick up everything from the nuance of a string pluck, to the saturated low frequency boom of a Black Eyed Peas kick drum.

Apple rates the Nano's battery life at 24 hours of continuous audio playback. We expect that estimate will ring true, provided that the screen is switched off. Like any touchscreen device, the more you fiddle with it, the faster you can expect the battery to drain. We'll update this review with test results from CNET Labs once they're available.

Via CNET



Add Your Review 92


* Below fields optional


Post comment as
SoniaY Facebook
10
Rating
 

"for those who only want to listen to music"

SoniaY posted a review   

The Good:small, easy shuffling, clip on, touch screen, long battery life

The Bad:nothing at all

at first i read the reviews and decided to not buy it.. then i actually couldn't find an ipod purely for listening to music, so yeah i got one.. the price is affordable too~ who needs a click wheel? touchscreen is fine the way it is, and to those who say it's too small, you must have huge fingers. shuffling songs is so much easier: all you have to do is to shake it gently. yer C:

oli
1
Rating
 

"Bring the old one back!"

oli posted a review   

The Good:Small

The Bad:No Camera, No Mic, No Games, No Click Wheel, No movies, No Notes, No Apps, No Speakers, No Calculator, and to small

I have the old nano and my father has bought the new one and i hate it. it just doesn't do what my one does and it is to small and complicated to use. they shouldnt of gotten rid of the old one instead they should of started a new product and called it the portable or something like that and keep the nano just how it was before

Mick
7
Rating
 

Mick posted a review   

It's my 1st ipod ever. I think its actually to small. trying to hold it and operate it is a challenge.

Electroman
4
Rating
 

Electroman posted a review   

The Good:Touch Screen and OS 10

The Bad:No Camera, No Mic, No Games, No Click Wheel, No movies, No Notes, No Apps, No Speakers, No Calculator, and to small

WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!!! Insted of Upgrading from the 5th gen, its been downgraded! I would rater have a 5th gn, even if it killed me.

MAKE THE NEXT GEN BETTER APPLE!!!!! ):(

james
2
Rating
 

james posted a review   

My ipod nano 5G was lost/stolen and i went to buy this... The design is completely impractical. i NEED buttons. Also dislike the thickness (clip) and general aesthetics. The lack of camera and games doesnt bother me, but the entire design does

where can i buy a refurbished BLUE nano 5g?? :'(

livswann
4
Rating
 

livswann posted a review   

The Good:Small, light, storage space, clips on easily, sweat resistant

The Bad:No click wheel

The only reason I upgraded to this model was for the extra storage and the previous one seemed to not like sweat much! I want to have something that is light and small to exercise but i dont want to have to frig around with only copying a certain amount of songs to the iPod each time, its much easier to just sync your whole library.

I used to have the old nano with a clickwheel. Considering that most people use the nano for exercise, you need to be able to change songs easily and using the touchscreen while exercising is a joke. This one also doesn't charge with the old iTrip so I can play songs through the car, but can't charge the ipod. There isn't any video playback anymore either, which i don't particularly care about but strange that a newer model should have less features than previous. The BIG thing is having to use the touchscreen instead of the click wheel. I understand they are trying to make the thing small but the previous Nano wasn't too big either. They should have made it large enough to keep the click wheel, remove the touchscreen (who the hell needs a touchscreen for a Nano??), and increase the storage. Then it would have been perfect!

I do love the clip on the back of it, makes it easier to attach to your clothes.

 

Niko posted a comment   

The Good:Light as a feather

The Bad:No Bluetooth

I purchased this iPod as I love listening to music whilst walking along the beach on a sunny day. It's size makes it perfect for this activity. I would never get over the fact that I dropped my iPhone 4 onto wet sand! It's also replaced my watch and pedometer. Now if only it had bluetooth, I would give the product a 10/10.

 

davidmcafee42 posted a reply   
Australia

Agreed, everything is better with Bluetooth and the nano would be great if you could bluetooth link your iPhone to be able to have notes and contacts on your nano.

Nik3
9
Rating
 

Nik3 posted a review   

The Good:Small, light, long battery life

The Bad:Nothing

The nano does mean small, and hey, this new Ipod is small. It's great for poeple who just want to listen to music and nothing else, cause it'll only drain the battery and shorten it's life.
I've also owned the nano with the click wheeler thing. And I much prefer this one.
If you have a problem with using the touch screen, maybe you should be using your finger tip, not your hand.

Barb
10
Rating
 

Barb posted a review   

If the nano is "not much bigger than your thumbnail" you have some serious problems, or you are a hippopotamus.


Sponsored Links
CNET's latest

User Reviews / Comments  Apple iPod Nano (6th generation)

  • SoniaY

    SoniaY

    Rating10

    "at first i read the reviews and decided to not buy it.. then i actually couldn't find an ipod purely for listening to music, so yeah i got one.. the price is affordable too~ who needs a click wheel..."

  • oli

    oli

    Rating1

    "I have the old nano and my father has bought the new one and i hate it. it just doesn't do what my one does and it is to small and complicated to use. they shouldnt of gotten rid of the old one ins..."

  • Mick

    Mick

    Rating7

    "It's my 1st ipod ever. I think its actually to small. trying to hold it and operate it is a challenge."

CNET Speedtest

Recently Viewed Products