Apple looks to ban Galaxy Nexus in US

Apple has requested a ban on the sale of the Samsung Galaxy Nexus smartphone in the US, claiming that the showcase for Google's heavily touted Ice Cream Sandwich Android operating system violates four Apple patents.

The Galaxy Nexus
(Credit: Samsung)

According to Florian Mueller at FOSS Patents, Apple brought a motion for a preliminary injunction against the device on Thursday (US time) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. A public, redacted version of the filing was made available late on Friday in the US, and the motion was filed simultaneously with a new federal lawsuit, Mueller reports.

The motion, Mueller says, is based on four patents: a "data-tapping" patent, a patent involving Siri and unified search, a new slide-to-unlock patent and a word-completion patent for touchscreen entry of text.

The unified search patent, which involves voice-assistant Siri's way of searching the net, could be a direct threat to Google's core search business, Mueller says, and he adds that the word-completion patent may cover functionality involved in Google's mobile search app.

The "data-tapping" feature, which, for example, lets users tap on a phone number in an email to automatically make a phone call, got Android handset maker HTC into hot water last year, when the International Trade Commission (ITC) ruled that the company had violated Apple's patent, and said it would enforce a ban on HTC's products that use the feature. HTC quickly said that it had developed a workaround.

Slide to unlock is currently at play in an Apple legal action against the Galaxy Nexus in Germany, where a resolution of some sort is expected in March.

Earlier this month, a German court rejected Apple's request to ban the Galaxy Nexus there. Apple had taken issue with Samsung's products for bearing resemblance to its own products. In this new case, Mueller claims, Apple "focuses completely on strong technical patents", as opposed to "softer, design-related rights."

Google and Samsung collaborated closely on the Galaxy Nexus, and unveiled it in October (at which time Samsung claimed that it had been Apple-proofed).

Since the first Nexus One (from HTC), Google has used its line of Nexus phones as a showcase for the latest user interface and features available with the updated version of Android, and the Nexus phones include no OS extensions from carriers. In this case, then, "stock Android itself is at issue", as Mueller puts it. "This means that Google cannot deny its undivided responsibility for any infringement findings." Meuller adds that the Galaxy Nexus' "role as a 'lead device' could also contribute to the willingness of the court to order a preliminary injunction."

Apple's Steve Jobs thought that Android was a knock-off of his company's iOS operating system, and famously said that Apple was "going to destroy Android, because it's a stolen product. I'm willing to go thermonuclear war on this." Since then, the battle between the two companies has only intensified, with information recently surfacing that suggests a Google home-entertainment device may be in the works.

Apple and Samsung, meanwhile, have quickly become fierce competitors in recent years, with a rise in popularity of smartphones and tablets. Their ongoing global legal dispute was kicked off with a US lawsuit filed by Apple against Samsung in April last year, which said that Samsung is violating its intellectual property in the design of its mobile devices, specifically the Galaxy series of smartphones and tablets. Samsung quickly countersued, saying that Apple is infringing on multiple patents. Since then, Apple has gone after Samsung heavily in Australia and parts of Europe — particularly in Italy and Germany, the latter of which is considered to be friendly to patent holders, and faster than courts in the US.

The loss of cutting-edge features in a mobile device due to patent issues can, of course, hamper the device's competitiveness. It's possible however, for companies to devise workarounds that avoid legal problems, but approximate desired functionalities.


Add Your Comment 5

Post comment as

Im Batman posted a comment   

My frustration with all this is related to how selective each party is in bring claims against others.
In this case Apple waits the GN to hit them with these patents, when android devices have been doing these things for ages.
I know its a battle and thye are playing a game, but they should set a presidence and stop infringement early on.
I find it confusing to see these claims against a new device when the majority of other devices can do them.

Voice search across the system, that was possible on android well before Siri.
Autocomplete and data tapping/actions, been standard on desktops/laptops for a long time, but why is the adaption to a touch interface so different.

Slide to unlock, change its name to "push to unlock" or "drag to unlock"


DanC2 posted a reply   

Totally agree with this comment.


DanC2 posted a comment   

Go away Apple! Bunch of patent trolls! If you can't win in the marketplace, you try to win in the courtroom... seems to be their motto I think. I'll never buy Apple, so don't bother hampering your competition with your useless lawsuits!


Will1505 posted a comment   

They won't get very far. First of all the phone is already in the market, not many courts will even think of banning a product that is already in sale.
Second, apple has not been very successful in the US with court cases. Maybe if it was germany they might have had a chance but not the US.


MitchellT posted a comment   

i think apple is going overboard yet again with the patents and design similarities. they just cant handle great competition anymore and want more money. play right for once apple and let your competition have a chance at winning the race

Sponsored Links

Recently Viewed Products