Bad boy Kogan called to ACCC's office

Australia's competition regulator has taken controversial Melbourne-based technology vendor Kogan to task for what it said was misleading advertising which could contravene the Trade Practices Act.

Kogan Agora

The Agora
(Credit: Kogan Technologies)

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) said in a statement today that Kogan's advertisements had used price comparison that could be misleading, such as "Now $X (Save Y%)" and "Save over $X". The savings, the ACCC said, were based on an estimated average price a consumer might pay for a product with similar specifications from another manufacturer — products Kogan wasn't itself retailing.

But the products might not be directly comparable with Kogan's own, the ACCC said, due to value-added features such as warranties and proprietary technology.

Consequently, Kogan has undertaken not to advertise its products at a discount unless that product has previously been advertised or sold in reasonable quantities at the higher price for a reasonable amount of time; not advertise savings unless it states how they are calculated; and implement a trade practices law compliance program.

Kogan, founded and operated by one-time Accenture consultant Ruslan Kogan, has achieved notoriety in the Australian market over the last several years by offering its own branded versions of netbooks, televisions and other technology goods, and going up against bigger multinational companies by doing so.

It had also promised to bring a mobile phone to Australia based on Google's Android operating system; a claim that never eventuated, although several preview models of the so-called Agora were displayed.

Previous Story

Sony Bravia KDL40W4500

TVs
Next Story

Sony Bravia KDL46EX1


Add Your Comment 11


Post comment as
 

George posted a comment   

We all don't need TV resolutions and technolgies that are cutting edge.
At the end of the day, if yout eyes can't tell the difference between the pricey TV and the Kogan, who cares?
Stop listening to huge marketing companies.
G

 

OJ posted a comment   

D you're a complete idiot. Look at your shirt, it's probably made in China. Try not using anything from China for one day ****.

 

PS posted a comment   

Kogan is a bad boy? why? Based on what? What kind of damage he has done to Australia to have all these criticism? Where are the fact? Please, look around, if there is any technology product (for end-user/ consumer) that no part is made from overseas?

 

Jungle posted a comment   

Back to journalism school for you Renai!

Good try though...

 

Monkey posted a comment   

Renai,

I question the use of the word 'bad' in relation to this sensationalist headline. What has Kogan done which qualifies him this title?

Your example, "Now $X (Save Y%)" has been used in retail for decades - this is not a new concept; regardless of whether it tests the boundaries of relevant trade acts. How does the concept of RRP differ from this?

Perhaps you should take more care in investigating facts.... for example, you haven't even named the abovementioned phone correctly.

"Consequently, Kogan has undertaken not to... implement a trade practices law compliance program."
What does that mean?? Your sweeping statement suggests that Kogan has failed to implement a contingency plan for which none but large-scale overly-bureaucratic organisations would even consider as part of their agenda.

Moreover, you're criticising Kogan for pulling the plug on a product for which they took the moral high ground by removing from sale (and refunded any monies paid) on the basis of FUTURE compatibility concerns.

I had a Kogan Agora on order and, though disappointed, was pleasantly surprised when my money was refunded because of these concerns.

I think you should do some further research before writing articles which slander young and innovative persons trying their hand at business.

As a footnote, if you are going to cite an Act you ought to include the year of promulgation.

 

simulacrum posted a comment   

If you're going to use cliche figures of speech use them properly.

"So-called" is used in reference to properties that something claims to have but doesn't. I might call someone a "so-called journalist" if I find their reporting artificially sensationalist or their english poor.

Perhaps you meant to call the Agora a so-called phone. Though that would be improper use too, since no-one doubts that it was a phone (despite the fact that it never went into mass production).

But "So called Agora"? Are you casting doubt on the fact that it was called the Agora?

 

AaronW posted a comment   

Using the word notoriety just dumbs cnet down to the advertorials they have just painted with this article. Please get some perspective!

 

NEv posted a comment   

I think you will find that the components in Kogan Tvs are made in the same chinese factories as components in brands such as Sony, LG, Sharp etc. Mitac lcd screens are an example.

 

Scott posted a comment   

Its quite a shame that people in Australia love to cut down a Tall Poppy.

Why be happy wishing ill of others?

If your life isn't fulfilling and you feel the need to cut down others in the process, then take a hard look at yourself... not for anyone else's sake but your own.

Editors of this article should also take a hard look to....

Have a great day.

 

Rocket posted a comment   

Yeah, and then he has the bottle to try and sell a stimulus package TV and claim his company is 100% Australian when all his parts are sourced from China. Im glad that initial reports show that his Kevin37 is selling poorly.


Sponsored Links
LCD TVs

Recently Viewed Products