Design
3 Mobile's previous broadband USB modem shared its design with the competition's dongles; a largish elliptical pod dangling from your USB port by a short connecting cord. 3 has ditched the dongle — indicating that while it's still available it may soon be phased out of production — and replaced it with a smaller USB attachment with a sharper, sleeker design.
The new USB modem is shaped like a USB flash memory stick but twice as long. An extender cable is also bundled with the modem, which acts as an antenna for when the modem is used in areas of limited reception. If we have one tiny, niggling complaint to make about the design, it's that the cap which covers the USB connection on the front can't fit on the back of the modem when it's in use, making it somewhat easier to lose.
Features
While compacting the hardware of the original design into its sexier new body, this revised model has also received a speed boost and is now capable of receiving data at 7.2Mbps, rather than 3.6Mbps like the older model. That said, the 3 Mobile network is, at the time of writing this, only capable of transmitting data at 3.6Mbps, however, an upgrade is scheduled for the end of 2008, which this new modem will be compatible with when the time comes.
Similar to the previous model, the new 3 USB modem features auto-installation directly from the USB drive. There's also a CD in the box to install the necessary drivers and software to use the modem with a Mac.
Performance
As mentioned above, all software and drivers install directly off the USB drive after connecting it to the USB port on your PC. In our experience, the initial settings were correct so it was a plug'n'play affair.
3 Mobile has been kind enough to supply us with both an old and new model of the USB modems so we've had the opportunity to compare their performance side-by-side. To test the performance we ran a series of online speed tests including CNET's own broadband test.
The good news is that we saw comparable performance, with both the old and new models achieving an average download speed of around 1.5Mbps — 2.4Mbps at its fastest, and around 900Kbps at the slowest. While this is slower than the 3.6Mbps theoretical network maximum, it is in line with 3's advertised estimates.
The bad news is that we saw comparable performance. This new device, with or without its antenna attachment, performs almost identically to the older technology, and only time will tell the sort of enhanced performance we can expect beyond 3's network upgrade.
Overall
Our message to owners of the original 3 Mobile broadband USB modem: relax, your technology is yet to be superseded. The new modem has a sexier look, and is made more convenient without the attachment cable, but is ultimately mutton dressed as lamb. This isn't suggesting the old technology is bad — our connections have been pleasingly zippy — but until 3 upgrade its network to deliver data at 7.2Mbps then earlier adopters needn't rush out to replace the original devices.
Due to timing restrictions these tests were only conducted in a series of inner city locations where reception is predictably strong. If you use either model of 3 broadband USB modems that is distant from any major metro areas we'd love to hear about your experiences in the talk-back section below or on the forums.
Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!
aa2008
20/06/2008, 03:12 PM
rating
8/10
Yep agree with this review, have had it for a week now, and finding it a nice replacement for ADSL connection. A couple of things this review doesn't mention is that you can dump telstra and your ISP once you get one of these babies. That's what I'm doing! Also, you can attach it to new wireless routers being release for this technology, so that you get wireless service around your house. See http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=880784
Pros: Replacing my $29.95 phone line and $50 ADSL connection with this 1 device, which I got on a $29 a month/2Gb plan.
Cons: Almost none. The speed is about the same as what I was getting with my ADSL1 1.5mpbs connection. Only thing I've noticed is that World of Warcraft has higher latency (about 600-700ms, compared to ADSL1 where I was averaging 400-500ms).
Other con is that you have to move it around if you have more than 1 PC. But now that I found out you can buy a wireless router to take the USB key, I'll be getting one of those (after I sell the NB9W).
Report offensive comment
ADSL-less
02/06/2008, 11:18 AM
rating
9/10
I mostly agree with the above review. The one thing I can comment on is performance in fringe areas. I did have an E220 the wouldn't work in several parts of my house - there are some blackspots where I hade zero 3G signal - but I've found in the last week that this modem will get reception in every one of them. It can take a while for it to pick up reception (the longest I've seen is 30 seconds) in these black spots, but once it has it, the speed was over 1Mbps on each speed test. Getting reception in other parts of the house is almost instant. I also found moving around the house that it doesn't drop out in some places like the E220 did. So I'm pretty happy with it - especially as it's the only Internet I can get in my location.
Pros: Better reception than the E220, smaller, ready for 7.2
Cons: The cap - I've missplaced it a couple of times already
Report offensive comment