Canon IXUS 110 IS

The 110 IS sacrifices quite a lot in order to accommodate its curious styling and additional features. Images aren't as great as we'd expect, but that doesn't mean they're not any good — you'll just have to do a bit more tweaking to get the best out of this camera.


7.7
CNET Rating
7.7
User Rating

View more from Canon »

About The Author

CNET Editor

Lexy spent her formative years taking a lot of photos and dreaming in technicolour. Nothing much has changed now she's covering all things photography related for CNET. You can find her hosting the weekly Pulse podcast.




When we reviewed the IXUS 100 IS recently, we commented that the only reason it didn't pick up an Editors' Choice award was because it lacked a wide-angle lens and a slightly longer zoom. The 110 IS fills in the gaps neatly where the 100 IS struggled, but is it enough to earn our unreserved praise? Read our review to find out.

Design

It's not a flattering term, the one that first strikes you when you are presented with the Canon IXUS 110 IS. We thought the most apt term was "peculiar", given the camera's rotund exterior and elongated form factor. You're not quite sure which way it's supposed to sit, whether on its base or on its side — and by all accounts, everyone we presented this camera to was just as perplexed as we were.

Fancy a chowder? (Credit: Canon)

In our video we likened the 110 IS to a mobile phone, given the curved elongated exterior and clam-like appearance. The rear of the camera is just as strange as the front, with two almond-shaped buttons for playback and menu control flanking the wheel, which all sit to the right of the 2.8-inch widescreen LCD. At the top, the power button, shutter button and function switch sit alongside each other, and there are three options to choose from: full automatic (with automatic scene detection), program and movie mode.

The 110 IS comes in a variety of colours, including a powder blue to a pretty in pink rendition, which we tested. Coated in a glossy finish rather than the brushed look we saw on the 100 IS, the cover is very susceptible to bumps and scratches, with the casing even slightly chipping in places if you knock it about a little too much. On close inspection, we think that Canon's design department was trying to come up with a successor to the much more aesthetically pleasing 870 IS.

Features

Comparing the 110 to its much more attractively styled brethren, the 100 IS, reveals the true advantages of this camera. Though it loses in the looks department, it picks up on most elements that we took issue with on the other camera. The 110 IS sports a wide-angle 28mm lens and a 4x optical zoom. HD video recording at 720p is also part of the package.

The widescreen LCD screen is an interesting inclusion because it allows you to take photos and movies as you'll see them in the 16:9 aspect ratio (in a reduced resolution though, at 9 megapixels or 4000x2248 pixels). That said, you'll also be able to take photos in the more standard 4:3 ratio as well. The sensor is the same as the 100 IS, at 12.1 megapixels, and most of the other extras like blink detection and scene selection in automatic mode are also present on this camera.

Performance and image quality

The camera starts up in 1.4 seconds and at first feels quite responsive. Then you come to take an image, and while actual shutter lag is fairly low, the delay between the camera taking the image and it being displayed on screen is rather lengthy. Overall, this camera is definitely not as responsive as the 100 IS, especially in taking and reviewing shots. The controls are also not as intuitive as the 100, especially when it comes to the scroll wheel. Even though you can essentially use the wheel as a four-way directional pad, with the interface images being shown on screen rather than on the buttons, we'd rather the simpler, more intuitive buttons that we found on the 100.

Colour saturation was not as pleasing as we saw on the 100 IS, nor was the general sharpness of images. In fact, we found the pictures had an almost vintage feel to them with washed out tones and the overall effect was a little flat. Chromatic aberration was also quite pronounced.

It's good to see that Canon hasn't pushed the bar too much in achieving hyper-real images; however, left in fully automatic mode you might be wondering why your photos look a little dull and lifeless. Of course, this can all be rectified by shooting in program mode and increasing the saturation by selecting vivid from the colour menu.

Click image to enlarge (Credit: CBSi)

There's a fair amount of barrel distortion at the wide end too which is fairly disappointing, and noise control was nowhere near as good as we saw on the 100 IS either. In fact, in general use, in relatively well-lit situations, images at ISO 400 were incredibly noisy. The movie mode was pretty much the same as we saw on the 100 IS except that it now has a slightly wider field of view thanks to the wide-angle lens. There is still no way to use the optical zoom during recording though.

Shooting speed
(In seconds (smaller is better))
Time to first shot Typical shot-to-shot time (flash) Typical shot-to-shot time Shutter lag (dim) Shutter lag (typical)
Canon Digital IXUS 870 IS
1.4
3.8
2.6
0.6
0.4
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
1.3
2.7
2.3
0.7
0.4
Canon Digital IXUS 110 IS
1.2
3.2
1.9
0.8
0.4
Nikon Coolpix S630
3.9
3.4
3.1
0.8
0.5
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ15
2.4
2.5
2.1
1
0.7

Typical continuous-shooting speed
(Frames per second (larger is better))

Conclusion

The 110 IS sacrifices quite a lot in order to accommodate its curious styling and additional features. To maintain a sleek exterior, functionality and ease of use has been reduced and instead relegated to menus and sub-menus, and while still in keeping with the Canon conventions, it's a little more confusing than the implementation on the 100 IS. Images aren't as great as we'd expect, but that doesn't mean they're not any good — you'll just have to do a bit more tweaking to get the best out of this camera.

Previous Story

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Digital Cameras
Next Story

Samsung ES15


Add Your Review 12


* Below fields optional


Post comment as
DarkDelaqroux
8
Rating
 

DarkDelaqroux posted a review   

The Good:Gets the job done... superbly

The Bad:Gets only some jobs done

I had this camera for 1.5 year. The camera take quite decent photos on good lighting and i had many people going in disbelief at how awesome the picture i took with this cam. Some of the photos are even comparable with photos taken with an SLR (unless on occasion where subject is moving too quickly or the surrounding is too dark) The camera, in my case, is pretty durable too. It fell once into a pile of snow, dropped into some wet beach sand, fell off the stairs etc. and its still working perfectly. As a lil added extra, the design make this camera easy to be left on surfaces without the support of tripods and, while slightly heavier IMO, it fits well in pockets. In all, Canon IXUS 110s gets only some jobs done. but when it does, the camera does the job superbly

RIP
(June 2009 - December 2010)

marcos eugenio d.s. dela torre
9
Rating
 

marcos eugenio d.s. dela torre posted a review   

The Good:macro, face detection, hd video, small size, image quality, effective high resolution images, long shutter for taking pictures of stars, wide angle lens--good for group pictures and landscapes

The Bad:cannot appreciate image stabilization--small camera shakes during 1sec shutter is very crucial, sometimes when shooting macro it focuses on backgrounds rather than on my main subject

but overall, i love it! this is my first cam,since i am just a student, i really saved my money for a very long period of time to buy this, and now i know it's worth my money and sacrifices...
; P

once held, i could not stop playing with it!!!

SHYAM
7
Rating
 

SHYAM posted a review   

The Good:Slim,attractive, fast response, High resolution images, Good video at 720, simple to use, pocket size, easy to carry and various function modes, resonable optical zoom (4X), good canon software with the camera, HDMI video port,world time zones setup, good battery time.

The Bad:Poor in manual controls, expensive, sometime auto mode photos are not god quality, sometimes pictures look grainy

I have been looking for a good compact camera for microscope use but perfect one is not available till today. Before this I was using Sony cybershot W7 for about 2 yrs but picture and movie quality were not upto the standard.I was interested in Canon G10 but it doenot have HD movie and very expensive in compared to pocket cameras has big lens.
I was looking for Nikon SD640 but it is not available in Kathmandu that has impressive pictures sample in the Nikon Website. Any way I needed the camera for Macro and microscope photography and bought this in this Month (Oct 2009), I have taken about 1000 pictures about 70% pictures are of good quality. I have been using varioud compact cameras from 2002 but taking pictures at same time at same spot doesnot produce similar results only 20-30% images look excellent one.

None of the reputed companies do produce solid, high performance and most of the features in their model, people are running for models, style, colour etc and it look as fashion of today and these cameras donot last long and companies are making good business; I couldnot understan this, I suggest reputed companies to make atleast one digital camera in their class perfect one so that we need not worry for 5-10 yrs, incorporating various features such as 10-15 MP, 4-8 optical zoom, HD movies, pocket size, metal body, robust design and possible all weather type

Thank you

 

Paul posted a comment   

The Good:different colours, compact

The Bad:Battery flattens easily, Poor picture quality and colour, Long lag between pictures

Poor in comparison to Ixus 500, poor colours, focus. 1/2 pictures OK only. Battery is always flat. Big lag between pictures. Send it to Canon under warranty as I was convinced that the unit was faulty but they returned indicating that the pictures were within expectations. Dear oh Dear, i wont be giving Canon anymore of my hard earned

crackers
5
Rating
 

crackers posted a review   

The Good:easy to use, love the buttons.

The Bad:auto shot mode is average at best. colour is inconsistent taking the same photo. image stabilization is worse than my 4 year old ixus 500.

The camera works. For the money I would have liked to get a camera that took a photo that was sharp and consistent in colour. We have a new child and only about half the photos turn out clear enough to keep.
As for the video this works quite well. but should not use the zoom as it only uses the digital zoom making the video grainy and very poor.
There is no feature to make the flash work with every shot in auto which is frustrating in some situations as you then have is set up the camera in manual taking away the the benefit of owning a small point and shoot.
Im rather dirty that i didn't spend the extra $100 and get the Lumix or save the money and get a cheaper ixus like the 80IS that perform good enough.

canonfan
8
Rating
 

canonfan posted a review   

The Good:light, easy to use, NB-4L batteries are compatible with my old canon ixus 60

The Bad:extra care with handling as casing is so smooth it is slippery, but you get a wrist strp

also bought from jb hifi for $390 as they price match other sellers

 

Donna posted a comment   

The Good:Easy to use, great LCD screen size, excellent pic quality, wide angle lens

The Bad:Seems like the casing/screen could mark easily - but I guess all cameras could.

I bought this camera yesterday at JB HI FI, bargained to $390. I had a Canon camera which was 4 years old and was frustrated with how long it took between pics. I adore this camera, it's quick to snap, smooth modern menus, great quality pictures, and love the 28mm wide angle - can fit so much in the shot!

 

poiters posted a comment   

The Good:Quick turn on, great picture quality, small and easy to use and navigate

The Bad:none

i bought this camera just the other day and it is great. im a begginner and it didn't take much to get use to it.

 

Snaphappy posted a comment   

The Good:Highly recommend this camera for size, ease of use and value for money.

The Bad:Expensive, but hunt around for the best deal.

Contrary to Col's review, I found lots of different colour options, including b&w and sepia. (See pg 75 of instruction booklet). Also got some great night shots. Very happy with the quality of the pictures. Best quality video clips I've found in a digital camera so far.

 

col posted a comment   

The Good:true pocket size camera, fit easily in my pocket along with my mobile. Has i nice sturdy feel to it(not cheap). Love the colour range.

The Bad:Lacks novelty features like; black and white mode and sepia. The control dial is prone to scratch.

Like the look and feel. Easy to use and take anywhere size.
The daytime shots turn out great, but night time not so.
I would still highly promote the camera to anyone. I bought mine from RYDA.COM for a nice price, and try to bargain the price down further :)


Sponsored Links

User Reviews / Comments  Canon IXUS 110 IS

  • DarkDelaqroux

    DarkDelaqroux

    Rating8

    "I had this camera for 1.5 year. The camera take quite decent photos on good lighting and i had many people going in disbelief at how awesome the picture i took with this cam. Some of the photos are..."

  • marcos eugenio d.s. dela torre

    marcos eugenio d.s. dela torre

    Rating9

    "but overall, i love it! this is my first cam,since i am just a student, i really saved my money for a very long period of time to buy this, and now i know it's worth my money and sacrifices...

  • SHYAM

    SHYAM

    Rating7

    "I have been looking for a good compact camera for microscope use but perfect one is not available till today. Before this I was using Sony cybershot W7 for about 2 yrs but picture and movie quality..."

Recently Viewed Products