Canon PowerShot A480

By Alexandra Savvides on 13 March 2009

If you're looking for a cheap, easy-to-use camera under AU$200 you could do far worse than the PowerShot A480. Design issues aside, it's a capable compact with decent image quality.

Editor's rating:7.3 User rating:6.8
  • Good: Pleasing image quality • Well priced
  • Bad: Chunky design • Icky LCD screen with poor viewing angle • Chromatic aberration issues
  • Specs: Digital compact • 10 megapixels • 2.5 inch • 3.3 x • See more specifications
  • RRP: AU$179.00

Design
While we are certainly not enamoured with the general aesthetic of Canon's A480, we're sure that someone out there will be. It's chunky, clunky and altogether un-funky, lending itself more to a "cheap and cheerful" description than anything else. It's certainly more attractive than its predecessor, the A470, which it replaces.

It's more Fisher Price than fashionista at the back.
(Credit: Canon)

Cased in plastic with silver accents, the front façade is the most exciting part about the camera, with the lens ring flanked in gloss and the flash unit snugly sitting at the top right-hand corner. Up top, there is a single power button and shutter button, whereas at the back, the configuration is equally utilitarian. The plastic buttons feel like something off a Fisher Price toy than from a Japanese camera manufacturer; even the zoom rocker is relegated to buttons.

The 2.5-inch LCD is relatively low resolution, and the lens is a standard 3.3x optical zoom that's 37mm at its widest. We tested a black model, but the A480 is available in silver, blue and red as well.

Features
For an entry-level camera designed for just about anyone to pick up and use, the A480 is low on features. There's the usual gamut of face detection, red-eye correction, motion detection technology and a selection of 15 shooting modes. Don't expect manual overrides here — the most you will get is a program mode which allows you to change the ISO, white balance, picture mode and metering mode.

For AU$179, there's no high-definition video either — instead, it's lumbered with 30fps VGA. Running on two AA batteries maintains the chunky feel carried over from the design, and as a result the camera bulges a little more to the right. The SDHC compatible card slot sits underneath the camera, under the same cover as the batteries.

Performance and image quality
To our surprise, the A480 coped a lot better than we expected in terms of image quality. Performance, on the other hand, was an entirely different issue.

To put it bluntly, this is not a fast camera — expect slow flash recycle times, slow shot-to-shot times and a reasonable amount of shutter lag. This is only to be expected with an entry-level model though we would have enjoyed it if it was a little quicker in these areas.

Our biggest concern with the A480 was the LCD screen. At 2.5 inches we can forgive it only so much; after all, on an entry-level camera we're not expecting huge numbers. However, it was the poor resolution and awkward viewing angle that really got our goat. In direct sunlight it was incredibly difficult to see, and it was really quite dull compared to Canon screens of old.

The A480 showed a reasonable amount of barrel distortion, just observe how the straight lines in the picture appear as if they are curved. Click image to enlarge.
(Credit: CBS Interactive)

Fortunately, image quality made up for these misgivings when we finally got to review the pictures. Punchy and accurate colours were the main drawcards, with that typical level of saturation that Canon cameras are known for. As for the lens, we were disappointed with how it lost sharpness towards the outer reach of the frame, and how it displayed a moderate amount of barrel distortion.

Chromatic aberration was also a problem, which is to be expected on cheaper optics. Flash recycle time took around two seconds, but at least the A480 displayed a warning on the screen to let us know what was happening. Noise control was relatively good at ISO levels below 400, yet ISO 800 and ISO 1600 appeared fairly similar, filled with grain.

Conclusion
As an introductory camera at a budget price point, you could do far worse than the PowerShot A480. We would recommend spending a little more to get a camera that will grow with your needs, and if you're determined to stick to Canon you probably should check out an older model for a similar price from the more compact IXUS range, such as the IXUS 80 IS, which you should now be able to pick up for a good price.

Topics: powershot, digital camera, canon, A480, camera, expect, iso, price, image quality, level

Comments (7)

  • Mr Meglio gave 7/10 on 20/10/2009 06:57 Report abuse

    • Good: Cheap, works well
    • Bad: Plasticky, bulky, not SLR quality

    Probably the best really cheap digicam I've used. If you can hold a camera, you can get good shots. Video is better than iPod, not up there with Handycam, but THIS will be in your pocketwhen the others won't...

  • Willie gave 3/10 on 09/08/2009 00:12 Report abuse

    • Good: Reasonable solid build and not unnatractive in appearance.
    • Bad: The worst LCD screen I have seen

    While the A480 has the potential to produce more than adequate pictures for the average family snapshooter, its pathetic LCD screen, with no optical finder to back it up, virtually renders the camera useless. I've handled quite a few cameras since 1999 and I haven't seen a screen worse than this one. Not even good value for money. Canon will have to improve on this.

  • Green gave a review on 04/07/2009 12:48 Report abuse

    • Good: value for money, good quality images considering the price.
    • Bad: AA batteries.

    This review is worthless, it never takes into account the price of the camera. consider the perspective of consumers who are looking at this price range in the first place.

  • http://www.digitalcameras1st.com/ gave a review on 29/05/2009 17:22 Report abuse

    • Good: Very Cheap Camera comes from Canon
    • Bad: I've once used a Camera with AA battery... Poor...always replace it all the times

    It's a camera that affordable to every one! The price suitable with the features.

  • Phred gave a review on 29/05/2009 01:24 Report abuse

    • Good: Inexpensive, sturdy
    • Bad: image quality (10MP sucks)

    Just bought this camera for a trip.
    Not happy with the highest resolution images. Lots of artifacts; easy to blur.

  • charlie gave 9/10 on 26/05/2009 19:33 Report abuse

    • Good: easy to use and small so it can fit into your pocket
    • Bad: nothing

    so good it might aswell be gold

  • DaFokker gave 8/10 on 17/03/2009 05:53 Report abuse

    • Good: Really good image quality. Great colours!(!!)
    • Bad: Seems like itīs completely made of plastic! :( Handwrap is attached to top-right, not to bottom-right of cameraīs body!

    Generally nice little camera. It fits ok in your pocket...but suits much better in jacketīs pocket than in trouserīs back-pocket!:) Itīs cheap, looks like itīs cheap...but it IS producing really good-quality pictures!! Doubt you can get something better in this price cathegory! (...no doubt - you canīt!:)

Post your own

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 & A..F

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

The Explain Series

Where to buy Canon PowerShot A480

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder

Recently viewed products