Canon PowerShot D10

By Alexandra Savvides on 11 May 2009

Canon's first attempt at an underwater camera is pretty impressive. There are a couple of areas to improve on like its video implementation and overall design, but for the most part the PowerShot D10 gets it right.

Editor's rating:7.8 User rating:6
  • Good: Quick performance • Extensive range of accessories • Best rugged credentials in its class • Fast lens
  • Bad: Fiddly battery/card cover • Chromatic aberration quite prominent • Digital-only zoom in movie mode • No HD video
  • Specs: Digital compact • 12.1 megapixels • 2.5 inch • 3 x • See more specifications
  • RRP: AU$599.00

Design

Admittedly, the PowerShot D10 got a bit of a bad reputation from its preview pictures before we had even seen one of them in the flesh. It's a bulbous, rotund camera that is difficult to find terms of affection for, but one thing is for certain — it looks exactly like you'd imagine an underwater camera would look like, should a product designer let their wildest, craziest ideas loose on the drawing board.

Straight away you'll notice the huge, round rivets located on each corner of the camera. At first they seem like a curious design feature, but are actually there so you can attach a host of other accessories like a neck strap.

Chunky, so chunky...
(Credit: Canon)

At the front, the lens unit pokes out of the body a fair way. Just like its fellow underwater brethren the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT1, there is no lens cover, but the D10's lens feels more susceptible to smudges and scratches just because it protrudes so much. Above it sits a Cyclops-style flash unit that's sure to scare small children and fish.

At the back, there's enough Fisher Price-style buttons to keep anyone's inner child happy, with the zoom rocker relegated to button control at the top right corner, a four-way directional pad, and shooting and review buttons situated just above the 2.5-inch LCD screen. All the buttons feel responsive and are large enough to press with slippery fingers or gloved hands.

The flaps that cover the battery and card slot, as well as the AV out compartment, aren't so easy to use. It's quite easy to break a fingernail or two trying to open the cover at the bottom — which is good news as it means the chances it will fall open in an underwater situation are slim, but bad if you place more value in your manicure than in your photography.

Features

Fortunately in the rugged camera battle, the megapixel race is (mostly) forgotten. Canon's D10 sits at 12.1 megapixels just like the Panasonic FT1, and the Tough 8000 from Olympus trails just behind at a straight 12 megapixels. As for the vital statistics, the D10 beats the other two hands down, waterproof to 10 metres, shockproof from 1 metre and freeze proof to -10 degrees Celsius.

Something from Loch Ness, perhaps? The D10 without the faceplate attached, and the long neck strap on the top corners. (Credit: CBSi)

When you first take it out of the box, the camera has a blue face plate attached to it, but as optional extras you can buy covers to change at your whim — there's a fluoro orange, muted charcoal and commando army green. Don't think the customisation stops there, as a plethora of other accessories are available to make your underwater shooting experience more useful. There's a shoulder and neck strap set that make the camera look like a creature from the Blue Lagoon, as well as a carabiner strap and a soft case.

In front of the lens sit two additional panes of glass, with a layer of air in between to help prevent condensation at extreme temperatures. As for the rest of the lens statistics, it's a 3x optical zoom, stabilised, with a widest aperture of f/2.8 — excellent news for letting in more light for dark underwater photography.

Accessing the menu system is a little different to the standard Canon configuration, as you use the buttons at the top rather than a dedicated switch. Available are automatic, program, scene or movie mode (note it's only VGA, not HD like we've seen on the FT1).

Performance

Normally, underwater cameras aren't the most satisfying to use if you value performance. Most of the Olympus Tough range, for example, takes a small eon to power on and shot-to-shot time is similarly glacial. So it is with much excitement that we report the D10's quick start-up time, blitzing in at 0.5 second. Successive shot time is also very quick for a camera of this class, as in continuous mode it is able to capture just over 1 frame per second.

Image quality

The lens lets down the D10 a fair bit considering the rest of the advantages it has over the other two from Panasonic and Olympus. Chromatic aberration is quite prominent on shots taken above water. That said, colours were nicely saturated and not overly punchy, retaining more of a natural feel.

Images at full magnification are a little soft and not as crisp as we would have liked to see, especially when comparing them to shots from the Panasonic FT1. This is not so much of a problem underwater — and indeed, the photos we took when submerging the camera were very pleasing — but above the surface it's quite noticeable, even without zooming to full magnification. Noise control is surprisingly good though, and sensitivity is even expandable up to ISO 3200 in scene mode.

The D10 copes quite well with increasing sensitivity, but images are a little soft. Click image to enlarge. (Credit: CBSi)

Another disappointment is that the D10 prevents you from using the optical zoom in movie mode — unlike the FT1.

Conclusion

Canon's first attempt at an underwater camera is pretty impressive. There are a couple of areas to improve on like its video implementation and overall design, but for the most part the PowerShot D10 gets it right.

At this stage we have to say the Panasonic FT1 is the better overall contender, thanks to HD video and styling credentials that make it just as easy to use above the water as below. For AU$599 though, the D10 is relatively good value considering the price of external underwater casings for other compact cameras.

Topics: powershot, digital camera, d10, canon, waterproof, shockproof, rugged, underwater, camera, lens

Comments (8)

  • Cherry gave 4/10 on 19/11/2009 23:32 Report abuse

    • Good: good camera good features
    • Bad: battery

    nothing should be wrong with it if your selling for that price! but other than that really good camera!

  • Polly bthye Parrot gave 8/10 on 30/09/2009 09:53 Report abuse

    • Good: Great colour, waterproof
    • Bad: Fiddly underwater

    Took this camera snorkelling non Galapagos Islands, some nice underwater shots, but colour truly outstanding on dry land. Interesting full digital zoom in most cases shows little or no noise.

    Tough camera as well; I have bashed it on rocks underwater, dropped it from about 1m. to the ground in a boat; yet it still chugs along.

    Proprietary battery is a nuisance, and needs regular daily charging if you take a lot of shots, then delete the dud ones, like I do.

    Otherwise very happy; can recommend highly.

  • phoebe gave a review on 10/08/2009 18:40 Report abuse

    i would love to buy this camera, make it cheaper please ;)

  • asdf gave a review on 26/07/2009 21:56 Report abuse

    A rivulet is a small river. Maybe you mean rivet.

  • Jondo gave a review on 23/06/2009 12:46 Report abuse

    I was just reading your article on the PowerShot D10 which you reviewed dated the 11 May 2009 at the URL http://www.cnet.com.au/canon-powershot-d10-339294897.htm

    Whilst making the comparison to the Olympus Tough 8000 you explicitly state that the D10 beats the Olympus "hands down" due to it's statistical capabilities in water ingress prevention, shock proofing etc., "As for the vital statistics, the D10 beats the other two hands down, waterproof to 10 metres, shockproof from 1 metre and freeze proof to -10 degrees Celsius"

    Yet, in your article dated 11 March 2007 reviewing the Olympus, you list the capabilities (which you refer to as 'limitations') as "Waterproof to 10 metres, shockproof from 2 metres, freeze proof to -10 degrees Celsius and crushproof up to 100 kilograms." Not only is the manufacturer provided specification on the Olympus as good as the Canon, but it is better as the D10 is only shockproof to 1 metre, the Olympus is double this at 2 metres, invalidating the statement in the later D10 article.

    From a reader standpoint (I have no affiliation other than that of a consumer / reader in terms of cameras etc.) it certainly seems that you have considerable bias toward the Canon product, which is a shame to see when one is trying to review these units for their own pre-purchase decisions, as brand does not necessarily dictate quality. I would urge you to review your articles and language to reflect the true nature of the product to provide a fair comparison.

  • Andrew gave a review on 15/06/2009 16:01 Report abuse

    I have had a four of Olympus's early SW series cameras. By the third one I realised that they were splash proof at best. I took great care of the seals but the things kept leaking (and they were much less than 2 years old). No wonder Olympus churned through the model updates so quickly! Sounds from Ros's post that things weren't fixed by the 770. If the price of this Canon model is OK I may give it a go and happily dump the XD card for better value and better supported SD's. I haven't checked out the panasonic in detail yet - looks like a choice between the two.

  • Best Digital Cameras gave a review on 10/06/2009 22:47 Report abuse

    • Good: Great performance! Specially the blue one. Great Features also.

    Good article! Love reading it.
    About this D10 IS. If I had to choose between Canon D10 and Olympus tough 8000, I'd rather choose D10. I'll get both, good features and lower price. ^_^

  • Ros Hodgekiss gave a review on 09/04/2009 18:23 Report abuse

    This is actually quite exciting, congrats to Canon for giving it a shot. Despite Olympus 'experience' with underwater cameras, the common complaint with them is that their waterproof seals decompose after 2-3 years. If Canon can beat this shelf-life, then they certainly have the trump card.

    Recently my Olympus 770 SW perished after a dip in less than 2m of water, despite being rated for immersion in up to 10m. Sadly, I cannot say that I enjoyed 2-3 years of use and with Olympus SW-series cameras selling for $500 upwards, one would hope that they would more frequently live up to their "tough" claims.

    Canon has a lot of room to move in this segment; if their pricing is competitive with Olympus' SW range, outdoor enthusiasts will certainly snap up the Canon D10 by the cartload. Sadly, a lot of folks may complain that it's pretty hard to take photos from within a brown paper bag, as I have to admit that it's one goddamn ugly camera..

Post your own

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 & A..F

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

The Explain Series

Where to buy Canon PowerShot D10

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder

Recently viewed products