Good luck getting it fixed. That black spot is a dead pixel, a malfunctioning electronic dot among the millions that make up a typical display. And manufacturers of TV sets, notebook computers, desktop PC displays and other devices equipped with LCD screens vary widely in their policies on rectifying them.
"This is one of the things nobody ever wants to talk about in the industry," said Paul Semenza, an analyst at research company iSuppli. "The reality is that there are a lot of (screens) that aren't quite up to snuff floating around, and they end up somewhere."
Sometimes they end up in your new notebook, as San Francisco engineer Rik Wehbring discovered a few years ago. The screen on his new Dell laptop turned out to a have a dead pixel.
Under Dell's policy, which considers a screen defective only if it has six or more faulty pixels, Wehbring didn't have a problem. To Wehbring's eyes, he did.
"It was definitely an annoyance," he said. "When it's your monitor and you're sitting 45 cm away, you definitely notice it."
Wehbring said Dell customer service told him he could send the screen in for repair, but he'd get a refurbished unit, and those were allowed to have as many as seven bum pixels. Instead, he took advantage of the company's 30-day return policy and sent back his laptop, later using the refund to gamble on another Dell. The screen on the new laptop was fine, but the initial experience left a bitter aftertaste.
"The real issue is truth and language -- broken is broken," he said. "They were trying to tell me I was silly for believing a dead pixel is a bad thing."
Dell spokeswoman Mary Fad said the company developed its dead-pixel policy to be brief and comprehensible to customers. But Dell can be flexible in interpreting it, she said, realising that some dead pixels are more aggravating than others. "It's something that's a little subjective," she said. "We try to work with customers on a case-by-case basis."
Dead pixels are the result of flaws in the glass sheets that go into displays. Inevitable glitches in the manufacturing process mean that some pixels don't illuminate properly -- or at all. Display manufacturers can avoid most defects by scrapping bad sections of a glass sheet, but a few bad pixels usually crop up in other areas.
John Jacobs, an analyst at research firm DisplaySearch, said the prevalence of bad pixels in consumer devices tends to change with the display market. When supplies are tight, gadget makers have to accept panels with more flaws, and those get passed on to consumers.
"The market for displays is pretty bad right now, so the (manufacturers) can raise the cosmetic specs and get away with that," Jacobs said. "If the market gets really, really tight, they'll change those policies to keep costs down... You're better off selling another 10,000 laptops and having 50 more returns than having to bump your prices way up."
| "This issue is akin to buying a new car and being told that there might be a couple of dents in the body panels, or new eyeglasses and being told that the lenses might have some scratches on them." -- Andrew Currie, Canadian filmmaker |
But applying such stringent quality standards dramatically raises the price of the finished device, as more than half the display glass the manufacturer buys has to be rejected because of flaws. Instead, device makers accept a certain number of defects and let the buyer beware.
Defining 'defective'
The trick comes in figuring out just what your gadget maker considers to be a defective screen. Some manufacturers, such as Dell, set specific policies laying out how many pixels have to conk out for a display to be defective.
While Dell's policy is relatively straightforward, some, such as those belonging to Acer and IBM, set complex formulas that distinguish between "bright dots" and "dark dots," the location on the screen and other factors.
Online retailer Newegg.com is one of the few stores that applies a uniform and widely publicised dead-pixel policy. Each LCD monitor listed on the site includes a reminder that the store will only replace if it has eight or more dead pixels.
"Not everybody's forthcoming with that kind of information," said Jommy Gayoso, director of sales and merchandising at Newegg. "We believe customers are better off if they know what they're getting into with a purchase."
Other manufacturers boast simple zero-tolerance policies on bad pixels as a way of boosting customer loyalty. Samsung last year began promoting a "no dead pixels" policy on some LCD monitors. And Nintendo has recently garnered praise for a lenient policy regarding replacing defective screens on its new DS handheld game player.
"We're seeing a shift toward zero defects," iSuppli's Semenza said. "Several years ago, the manufacturers were basically saying that if there's not three (dead pixels) in a row or a cluster, they don't count -- all these nitpicky things that put the risk on the consumer. It's like saying that as long as three wheels work on your car, it's OK. It's clearly not something consumers want to hear, and the manufacturers are having to respond."
Ithaca, N.Y.-based Web developer Teri Solow said she appreciated the clarity of Nintendo's policy for the DS. Even though the company basically promises to fix any screen defects bad enough to annoy the consumer, Solow decided that the bum pixel or two on her player weren't noticeable enough to warrant replacement.
| "It's like saying that as long as three wheels work on your car, it's OK." -- Paul Semenza, iSuppli analyst |
Apple Computer employs a similarly vague policy for its PowerBook laptops, desktop displays and other products, saying an undetermined number of "pixel anomalies" are normal in such products, and Apple will decide when a problem is bad enough to warrant service.
Canadian filmmaker and comedian Andrew Currie said he learned of the policy when he bought a PowerBook a few years ago and discovered several dead pixels on the screen. The screen was replaced, but only after much haggling with Apple.
"I had absolutely no idea, and my first reaction to hearing the policy was, 'Well, I never agreed to that!'" Currie said. "This issue is akin to buying a new car and being told that there might be a couple of dents in the body panels, or new eyeglasses and being told that the lenses might have some scratches on them."
DisplaySearch's Jacobs, formerly a global supply manager at Apple, said the company's pixel policy is designed to put the onus on consumers. "Basically, Apple has a policy that if you make a stink, they'll replace it," he said.
An Apple representative did not respond to requests for comment.
Currie later bought one of Apple's Cinema Display desktop monitors and negotiated with the retailer to make sure he eventually got one without bad pixels. He said Apple and other manufacturers would serve customers better by adopting zero-tolerance policies on bad pixels.
That's not a bad idea, Jacobs said, given that most customers won't notice or complain about one or two bad pixels. For those who do, a simple "we'll fix it" policy like Nintendo's ensures goodwill.
"It's cheap customer love, saying, 'We care, we're going to give you the best-quality product,'" Jacobs said. "But the number of people who actually complain and do something about it is still going to be pretty small."
Semenza, however, said dead pixels will become more rare through a combination of improvements in manufacturing processes and market forces, especially as flat-panel displays proliferate in the home. "For TVs, any defect is unacceptable," he said. "If you're asking somebody to pay $5,000 for a high-resolution TV, they're not going to accept any flaws."
Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!



Scott McFocker
21/02/2005 06:37 PM
I will stick with my old CRT monitor and TV until the dead pixel issue is an non issue or until I can no longer get CRT replacement parts. Dead is bad. Dead is inactive Dead is dead.
Report offensive content
Jim Stephanidis
23/02/2005 11:31 AM
I've been waiting for years to get an LCD monitor. So, I purchased one recently only to find out that there is this acceptable practice that manufacturers have adopted to allow defected merchandise out of their factories. I think the consumer is being duped. There should, at least, be something attached to the packaging that educates the buyer of the number of dead pixels on the model they are about to buy. The funniest thing that strikes me about the whole issue is reading the company spokesman statements justifying the dead pixel issue. I like my new monitor, but I'm going to return it based on principle. I think the Attorney General should step in and put a stop to this fraudulent activity.
Report offensive content
Geoff Brown
24/02/2005 03:39 PM
i recently went to purchase a $10,000 Flat Screen and while browsing found so called "MINOR" faults in the form of dead pixels which the retailer said was acceptable to the manufacturer, his company and to other customers, so why did I have a problem? I said 'I dont have a problem , but due to his attitude, I will not purchase the screen i wanted. I will wait until quality improves'. We should all tell the manufacturers that any fault is unacceptable and not buy new technology until they are 100%.
Report offensive content
Tony
26/05/2005 09:41 PM
Buyer Beware.....!! Or just Buyer Bad luck. In this day and age of web based purchasing of LCD equipment and alike, it certainly makes buying these bad/defective pixel screens more of a lottery than a case of the consumer having the ability to inspect the exact screen prior to payment. As noted in your article most suppliers will continue to dance and debate around the subject of dead pixels to create consumer confusion regarding the quality standards of LCD Screens in the market place irrelavant of the brand (i.e. hoping to diffuse the situation by stating that the market place in full of defective screens, and you have unfortunately ended up with one of them..... By the way have you understood our minimum xx quantity defective pixel clause which you have not yet to reached..) I look forward to further market competitiveness where lesser quality materials are continually sort for increased manufacturer profits. Undoubtably the only potential loser here is the consumer.
Report offensive content
nrs
29/08/2005 09:45 AM
Dead pixels are unacceptable; end of story. i recently bought a 17" LCD monitor and insisted on seeing it out of the box running [so i could check for zero dead pixels] before i parted with my money. the manufacturer's policy is only relevant if you have bought the device "sight unseen". prior to agreeing to purchase, it is your policy that counts -- if the retailer won't let you inspect your purchase prior to acceptance, walk away. customers get what they are prepared to accept.
Report offensive content