Photographers take multiple shots to reduce the chance that pictures will be marred by blinking or grimacing subjects. Now astronomers are applying the same technique to improve images of distant objects.

Images of the Cat's Eye Nebula taken with the 200-inch telescope at Palomar Observatory. On the top is a conventional image, and on the bottom is one produced using the "lucky imaging technique".

Scientists at the University of Cambridge and California Institute of Technology have developed a "lucky imaging" technique that takes large numbers of pictures to get around the problem that Earth's atmosphere degrades image quality. That technique relies on a high-speed camera that takes as many as 20 images per second, then on a computer that sifts out the sharpest and combines them into a final view.

"These are the sharpest images ever taken either from the ground or from space," lead researcher Craig Mackay of the University of Cambridge's Institute of Astronomy said in a statement.

The technique has produced sharper images than those in space and is vastly less expensive. The 200-inch Hale Telescope at Caltech's Palomar Observatory, built in the 1940s, ordinarily produces images 10 times less detailed than those of the Hubble Space Telescope. But the lucky camera produces double the resolution -- combined with existing technology called adaptive optics that compensates for some atmospheric distortion, the researchers said.

The technique will work on larger, more modern telescopes such as those at the European Southern Observatory in Chile and the Keck telescopes in Hawaii. "The low cost means that we could apply the process to telescopes all over the world," Mackay said.

Adaptive optics works well for infrared light, but the Hubble beats out the Palomar telescope for light visible to humans. The lucky imaging system produces better material for the adaptive optics system to work with, the researchers said, with the result that the Palomar telescope comes out ahead.

Lucky imaging has been around as a concept since the 1970s, but it's only been possible now through the development of a new generation of image sensors that combine high sensitivity with low electronic "noise" that degrades the image with spurious speckles. The Cambridge-Caltech team used a sensor made by E2V Technologies, the researchers said.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Be the first to comment on this article!

  • Leave a comment

All fields marked with * are required

What do you think

Your e-mail will not be displayed

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars.


  • Google adds Android app for Flickr photos

  • Revamped Google Picasa site identifies photo faces

  • Olympus Mju 1060

  • Olympus FE-320

  • Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

  • Canon EOS 1000D

  • Microsoft, Nikon sign patent-sharing deal

  • Kodak EasyShare M1020

  • Nikon D90

More articles »

Find the right digital camera

Brand
  • Multiple options can be selected

    The Explain Series

    • Olympus Mju 1060

      Olympus Mju 1060

      In this season of offerings, we've noticed two growing trends among manufacturers: touchscreen-enabled or ultra-high resolution point-and-shoots. But Olympus' latest darling in its Mju family, the Mju 1060 has neither. So does this new shooter have what it takes to pit itself against other more sophisticated compacts?

    • Olympus FE-320

      Olympus FE-320

      It is easy to like the FE-320 for its stylish looks and feature-rich specifications. But what we like to applaud Olympus for is in making things work.

    • Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

      Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

      It has been about two years since Panasonic's last LX-series camera, the DMC-LX2, was launched. One of the most interesting things about that model was its 16:9 aspect ratio sensor and a good range of manual controls not usually found in digital compact cameras. We spent a day with the upcoming successor to the LX2, the DMC-LX3. Here's what we found out.

    • Canon EOS 1000D

      Canon EOS 1000D

      The Canon EOS 1000D is a good entry-level dSLR, but only its photo quality stands out among the competition.

    • Kodak EasyShare M1020

      Kodak EasyShare M1020

      Despite the large screen and Quick Touch Border feature, the M1020 is priced at AU$349 which is a bit pricey for a digital frame that freezes all too often.

    More reviews »

    Membership benefits

    Create wishlists

    Create wishlists

    See a product on CNET.com.au that you want? Add it to your wishlist and send a hint to your friends and family. Sign up for a free CNET.com.au membership now!