Nikon Coolpix S200

By Will Greenwald on 13/08/2007

More Nikon Australia reviews , RRP: AU$299.00

The good:

  • Super-slim design
  • Face-detecting autofocus a nice touch

The bad:

  • Disappointing lens
  • Noisy, soft pictures

The bottomline:

The Nikon Coolpix S200 digital camera looks pretty and will fit almost anywhere, but it just doesn't take very good photos.

Editors' rating:

6.4/10

Users' rating:

5/10

For point-and-shoot cameras, size can mean almost everything. If a camera is just half an ounce too heavy or half an inch too thick, it'll be too uncomfortable to carry around. Smaller doesn't automatically mean better, however. The 7-megapixel Nikon Coolpix S200 is one of the smallest cameras we've seen in a long time, though it isn't necessarily better than the competition.

Design
This ultraslim, metal camera cuts one of the smallest profiles we've seen yet. At barely 19mm thick, the S200 is only a hair larger than the popular Motorola Razr phone. It weighs only 125 grams, so you'll barely even feel it in your pocket. This small design has its drawbacks, though; the camera's various controls, especially its zoom rocker, are small, flat buttons that can feel awkward to large-thumbed users.

Such a thin body doesn't leave much room for a lens. The S200's slender form sports a diminutive 38mm-to-114mm-equivalent 3x lens, hardly ideal for telephoto or wide-angle shots. You can still take plenty of pictures with the camera, but you'll have a hard time capturing vast landscapes or a tight headshot from the other side of a room with it.

Features
Besides the mediocre lens, the S200 sports little more than the most standard features you would expect to find on a pocket camera. A modest 2.5-inch LCD screen dominates most of the camera's back panel. Its 7-megapixel sensor can reach up to ISO 1,000 sensitivity and offers Nikon's electronic Vibration Reduction, an ISO-and-shutter-speed-boosting feature for shooting with the zoom or in low light. Electronic VR isn't quite as effective as Nikon's optical Vibration Reduction, found on the S200's stainless steel brother, the Coolpix S500. The S200 also features Nikon's Face-Priority AF, a face-detecting feature that finds subjects' faces and uses them to determine focus. That way you shouldn't end up with a portrait that's focused on the plant behind Aunt Martha instead of on her face. Face detection is usually found on more high-end shooters, and sometimes determines exposure as well as focus, but Nikon has so far stuck with AF only and includes it in almost all of its snapshot cameras.

Performance
An inordinately long low-light shutter lag holds back the S200's otherwise acceptable performance. While the camera took only 0.6 second for our high-contrast shutter lag target, it took a startling 2.6 seconds with our low-contrast target. This long wait seriously hinders the camera's usefulness when shooting in low light. Otherwise, it performed sluggishly in our lab tests. After taking 1.7 seconds to start up and capture its first JPEG, the S200 could fire off a new shot every 1.9 seconds with the flash turned off. With the flash enabled, that time increased to 3.2 seconds. Burst mode snapped 10 full-resolution shots in 10.2 seconds for a rate of about 1 frame per second.

Shooting speed (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Shutter lag (low light)  
Typical shot-to-shot time  
Time to first shot  
Shutter lag (typical)  
Canon Digital IXUS 75
0.9 
1.6 
1 
0.5 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W80
1.4 
1.2 
1.8 
0.6 
Nikon Coolpix S200
2.6 
1.9 
1.7 
0.6 
Nikon Coolpix S500
2 
2.8 
2.9 
1.1 

Typical continuous-shooting speed (frames per second)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Nikon Coolpix S200
1 

Image quality
Images from the S200 aren't as sharp as we'd expect from a 7-megapixel camera. Finer details, such as smaller text or the texture of fabrics, just aren't as crisp as they could be. We saw some ISO-related noise, even at the camera's lowest ISO setting of ISO 50, though it was minor and visible only on monitors and not in prints. This remained about the same at ISO 100, though Nikon's noise reduction eats up a tiny bit of sharpness in the process. At ISO 200, noise increases a little bit and a tad more sharpness is lost, but you should still be able to get nice prints. The same can be said for ISO 400, which has a similar slight increase in noise and decrease in sharpness along with a minor loss of overall dynamic range. At ISO 800, noise increases precipitously, becoming a covering of white speckles, while a large amount of shadow detail goes by the wayside. This only becomes worse at ISO 1,000. We suggest staying below ISO 800.

Thanks to the S200's disappointing lens, most photos appear at least slightly distorted. Both wide-angle and telephoto shots develop a small amount of barrel and pincushion distortion, respectively. Strangely enough, we found that the most distortion appears in the middle of the lens, between the wide-angle and zoom extremes.

To its credit, the S200 does some things right. For example, its automatic white balance does a very nice job of neutralizing colours in incandescent and fluorescent lighting, and its tungsten preset was able to cope with our tough tungsten studio lights. Plus, the camera did a decent job of balancing flash with ambient light sources.

The Nikon Coolpix S200 suffers from a bad case of style over substance. Its ultraslim, attractive metal body looks great sliding into your pocket. When you slide it out of your pocket and start shooting, though, its image-quality issues and slow low-light performance severely tarnish the pretty camera's shine.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

E.Bross
09/11/2008, 11:53 PM

rating
8
/10

Hey people.....HEELLLOOOOO!!!!! You want a digital reflex camera with fantastic quality pictures and sharp contrast etc; then pay little bit more. By today's standards, this is a quality product for the price you are paying. If you are not able to get around with a camera and expect to point and shoot and have an award winning picture; then you have the wrong camera. This is a small and versatile camera that does justice with its good (but not great) quality pictures and likeable features. Take your time with the camera and learn its functions and you will see that it isn't as bad as some people may say it is.

Pros: A user friendly camera that takes decent picture for a decent price. € 300,- is not a good price for the camera anymore, being it is now late 2008; but if you can pick one up for less than € 200,- ; then you made a great deal.Don't let the people who think they know it all discourage you. It fits well in the hand and is easy to use if you read the instruction manual thoroughly. A great gift article for a teenagers first camera as well. It doesn't have webcam capabilities; but it is none the less a nice camera.

Cons: That the price hasn't changed on this website. You can get them for around € 200 or less nowadays. A worthy investment

Report offensive comment

Jason
05/07/2008, 03:09 PM

rating
8
/10

My friend has a agfa camera. I like its results and want to buy a camera. Which have good result and no more pricey. I go to market and than i bought a nikon camera. My all friends give me a suggest that i give back this camera. But for some reasons I can't back it. In short of time their are many ceremonies are come where i was gone with my this camera. Its results rocks me and all my friends and family members. Actually when i bought it i only like its stylish design and its graceful color. But when i use it and see its digital snaps results which are great. I am very happy now.

Pros: Raw capture.
Solid image quality.
Anti-shake capabilities.
Manual exposure controls.
Zippy performance.

Cons: Nothing.

Report offensive comment

valban27
31/12/2007, 03:27 PM

rating
2
/10

Dissapointing picture.
Not wise to buy one.

Pros: Attractive appearance.

Cons: Day vision not sharp.
The image gets worst for night vision

Report offensive comment

bob
06/11/2007, 04:05 PM

rating
2
/10

It's OK...
just the pics are usually dodgy. don't buy it if you want a good camera.

Pros: pretty

Cons: bad photos

Report offensive comment

  • Leave a comment

All fields marked with * are required

What do you think

Rate this product:

Need help? Read our guidelines for what each number rating represents.

Your e-mail will not be displayed

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars.

CNET.com.au videos

Get Adobe Flash player

  • Microsoft gets a better answer to Flickr

  • Olympus E-30

  • 14.7-megapixel face-off: Canon's 980 IS vs. Samsung's NV100HD

  • Canon IXUS 980 IS

  • Nikon D3X

  • Exposure: Gerry Pearce

  • You speak and ShutterVoice listens

  • Photoshop supports 5D Mark II, camera profiles

  • DxO sheds light on camera sensor performance

More articles »

Find the right digital camera

Brand
  • Multiple options can be selected

    Membership benefits

    Create wishlists

    Create wishlists

    See a product on CNET Australia that you want? Add it to your wishlist and send a hint to your friends and family. Sign up for a free CNET Australia membership now!