Nikon Coolpix L10

By Will Greenwald on 12/10/2007

More Nikon Australia reviews , RRP: AU$149.00

The good:

  • Decent picture quality
  • Decent performance

The bad:

  • Very few controls
  • Very slow flash recycle time
  • Relatively low resolution
  • Slow shutter in low light

The bottomline:

The Nikon Coolpix L10 makes a great budget point-and-shoot camera, if you don't mind its paltry 5-megapixel resolution.

Editors' rating:

6.4/10

Users' rating:

7.7/10

You don't need a high-resolution camera to get good-looking pictures. If they're made right, 5-megapixel cameras can produce great photos. If you're on a tight budget, but still want to take some photos, consider the Nikon Coolpix L10. This little camera has few features, a very slow flash recycle time, and can only produce up to 5-megapixel stills, but its tiny price tag and decent picture quality make it a solid budget contender.

Design
As Nikon's lowest-end budget camera, the L10 is hardly built to impress. Its unassuming, blocky plastic body measures just an 60mm thick and weighs about 167 grams with an SD card and two AA batteries, making it compact enough for most jacket and shirt pockets. The camera sports a relatively low-resolution 5-megapixel sensor, a narrow 37.5-112.5mm equivalent, f/2.8-5.2 3X optical zoom lens, and a downright puny 2-inch LCD screen.

Despite its unimpressive hardware, the camera still has the same handy features Nikon includes on all of its Coolpix cameras. Face-Priority AF finds faces in portraits and family photos, adjusting focus accordingly. In-Camera Red-Eye Fix corrects red-eye when processing photos. D-Lighting senses when subjects are backlit or dark, and changes exposure settings to correct those problems after the picture is taken. This typically results in a photo with a narrower dynamic range, but it can also mean the difference between a usable picture and no picture at all.

Features
Like every Coolpix L-series and almost every other budget camera out there, the L10 offers very few user controls. Besides white balance, exposure compensation, and a standard selection of scene presets, you can't change many of the camera's settings. Most notably, the aforementioned exposure compensation is the only control you have over a photo's exposure. This means very little flexibility when shooting, but that's not necessarily a bad thing; if the snapshot camera shoots well on its own, it doesn't need many manual settings.

Performance and Image quality
Fortunately, the L10 indeed takes good pictures. You can't blow them up or make prints nearly as large as shots taken from 8- or 10-megapixel cameras, but the L10's 5-megapixel pictures are still more than acceptable for letter-size prints, e-mail, and Web sites. The camera reproduces colours faithfully, and its automatic white balance appeared neutral even when shooting under our warm tungsten lights.

While its automated ISO sensitivity prevented us from performing our full set of noise tests, you should expect a fair amount of noise when the camera decides to up the ISO. Thankfully, Nikon does a decent job of keeping that noise under control, so that it shouldn't take away from prints until you get up to the camera's highest couple of sensitivity settings. However, if you don't mind shooting with flash when necessary, the camera probably won't have to push the ISO too high and you should get decent prints a good portion of the time.

Though certainly not fast in our tests, the L10 wasn't too bad for a rock-bottom budget camera. After a two-second wait from power-on to capturing its first shot, we could take a new photo every 2.2 seconds with the flash turned off. With the onboard flash enabled, that time more than doubled to a very disappointing 4.5 seconds. While its shutter only lagged 0.7 seconds with our high-contrast target, our low-contrast target made it pause for an arduous 2.2 seconds. Burst mode worked well, capturing 14 5-megapixel stills in seven seconds for a satisfying 2fps.

Shooting speed (seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Typical shot-to-shot time  
Time to first shot  
Shutter lag (typical)  
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W35
1.7 
1.4 
0.4 
Nikon Coolpix L10
2.2 
2.0 
0.6 
Nikon Coolpix L11
2.2 
1.8 
0.7 
Olympus FE-230
2.4 
2.5 
0.9 
Nikon Coolpix L12
2.4 
2.5 
0.7 

Typical continuous-shooting speed (frames per second)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Olympus FE-230
N/A
Nikon Coolpix L10
2.0 

For such an unassuming little camera, the Nikon Coolpix L10 actually works pretty well. It's responsive enough for casual shooting, and its (admittedly small) 5-megapixel photos look great. If you're looking for a simple, functional camera for less than AU$200, this makes a great choice. If you're willing to spend a bit more for slightly higher resolution photos, the L10's bigger brothers, the Coolpix L11 and L12, offer 6- and 7-megapixel stills for AU$279 and AU$349 respectively.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

photoshooter
29/07/2008, 04:15 PM

rating
3
/10

This camera is ok. Doesnt work well with my comp which runs XP home. Slow shutter with low light makes it **** for close ups with no flash. And this thing absolutely BURNS through batteries. Even with flash off

Pros: cheap

Cons: -Sucks battery like a asian hooker sucks dick
-Very slow shutter on low light

Report offensive comment

awdav
29/12/2007, 11:21 PM

rating
10
/10

Bought one today for $98 new. Replaced a Kodak 2.0MP C series. Really nice camera for the price and for a snapper of family photos only, this little gem is a god send.

I can;t believe the speed in it's readiness to take the next photo and with the flash on its still not too bad.

Compared to it's rivals, Nikon have done a good job with this little camera...very impressed

Pros: Price, Size, Weight, Speed, Functions, Quality of Photos

Cons: Delete feature is too well hidden for Delete All, easy to scratch the casing.

Report offensive comment

Andy Carnahan
06/10/2007, 07:41 AM

rating
10
/10

The high rating is based on my needs - a good digital camera for snaps. It is perfect for that

For a simple basic camera the L10 is excellent. 5MP is plenty for good photos. The battery life is good. I replaced a 7 year 1.3 MP Sony Cybershot U that cost $500 and a 4 year old $1,000 5 MP Sony. The Cybershot U was a great size, the 5MP Sony was a disappointment for the price.

The L10 shows how far Digitals have come - I paid around $150 and have been really happy with the result. I carry the camera with me, and because of the low price don't have to be too precious about it.

I don't like the connection software - both Sonys connected as USB devices, the Nikon uses the Windows Picture "Wizard".

Pros: Price, functionality, picture quality

Cons: flash washes out close up, close up focussing, connection software

Report offensive comment

  • Leave a comment

All fields marked with * are required

What do you think

Rate this product:

Need help? Read our guidelines for what each number rating represents.

Your e-mail will not be displayed

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars.

  • Canon EOS 50D

  • Which IXUS? Choosing the right Canon ultra-compact camera

  • Canon Digital IXUS 85 IS photo samples

  • Fujifilm FinePix J100

  • SLRs for savvy shooters

  • Which Nikon digital SLR?

  • Exposure: Zander Snape

  • Olympus E-520

  • Digital 3D photography made easy by Fujifilm

More articles »

Find the right digital camera

Brand
  • Multiple options can be selected

    Membership benefits

    Create a personalised homepage

    Create a personalised homepage

    Choose your interests from our 16 categories and only see articles relevant to you. Sign up for a free CNET.com.au membership now!