Nikon Coolpix L12

By Will Greenwald on 07/06/2007

More Nikon Australia reviews , RRP: AU$249.00

The good:

  • Face-detecting autofocus
  • Optical image stabilisation

The bad:

  • No user control over ISO sensitivity
  • Painfully slow flash recycle time

The bottomline:

The budget Nikon L12 includes a few surprising features, but its flaws outweigh its benefits.

Editors' rating:

6.6/10

Users' rating:

5.7/10

You just can't expect a whole lot from a AU$349 camera. Budget-priced shooters might be reliable, but they very seldom offer anything unique or high-end. The 7-megapixel Nikon Coolpix L12 bucks this trend by including two premium features in its unassuming, inexpensive form.

Design
With a plain, silver plastic shell that measures an inch across, the 125 gram L12 isn't the most slim or stylish shooter. Its compact body curves slightly outward on the right side to make room for two AA batteries that power the camera. The camera's back panel holds a 2.5-inch LCD screen and a handful of controls, including a joypad and a sliding mode switch. The joypad and buttons loom large on the camera and can be manipulated easily, though the mode slider and zoom rocker feel slightly too small to be comfortable.

Features
Like most budget cameras, the 7-megapixel L12 focuses more on automation and simplicity than on customisation. Besides white balance and a handful of scene presets, the camera automates most shooting settings, including ISO sensitivity. When shooting in low light, the L12 automatically boosts sensitivity up to ISO 1600, a potential problem for noise-wary shooters. Surprisingly, the L12 offers manual white balance along with the standard selection of incandescent, fluorescent, cloudy, sunny, and flash white balance presets.

Despite its otherwise unimpressive attributes, the L12 boasts two high-end features we were surprised to see in a budget camera. Nikon's optical Vibration Reduction shifts the camera's 35mm-to-105mm equivalent lens to help reduce shake. Face-priority autofocus identifies subjects' faces and adjusts camera settings to best capture them. Both of these features are usually found on higher-end cameras like Nikon's Coolpix S500, and it's good to see them appear on a sub-AU$400 shooter.

Performance
An extremely long recycle time renders the L12's flash almost unusable. Once you take a photo with the onboard flash, it takes an arduous 8.6 seconds to reset. During that time the screen blanks out, preventing you from reviewing your photo, changing settings, or even just disabling the flash so you can shoot without it. Even with the flash turned off, the L12 simply fared poorly in our lab tests. After a 2.5-second wait to power on and capture its first image, the camera could fire off one shot every 2.4 seconds without the flash enabled. The shutter lag measured an adequate 0.7 second with our high-contrast target, but a painful 2 seconds with our low-contrast target. Burst mode captured 15 full-resolution shots in just under 10 seconds for a rate of 1.5 frames per second.

Shooting speed (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Flash shot-to-shot  
Typical shot-to-shot time  
Time to first shot  
Shutter lag (typical)  
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W55
1.7 
1.4 
1.3 
0.5 
Canon PowerShot A630
2.3 
1.6 
1.5 
0.5 
Samsung S850
3.2 
2.1 
2.1 
0.5 
Nikon Coolpix L12
8.6 
2.4 
2.5 
0.7 

Typical continuous-shooting speed (in frames per second)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Nikon Coolpix L12
1.5 

Image quality
Because the L12 automates ISO sensitivity, we couldn't perform our full litany of noise tests. This automation also means that indoor and low-light shots can vary wildly in quality, depending on how much the camera decides to boost sensitivity. In good lighting, the L12 takes very nice, colourful photos. In low lighting, the camera's ISO-boosted grain, and the noise reduction algorithms that try to keep it in check, destroys much of the detail in the captured images. Since the flash takes so long to recycle, and its high ISO noise is so obtrusive, the L12 is rendered almost useless in low light.

Even though it includes features we were surprised to see on a budget camera, the Nikon Coolpix L12 simply has too many problems for us to recommend it. While face detection and optical image stabilisation are both very nice, they can't make up for the camera's slow shooting, painfully long flash recycle time, and inconsistent low-light shots. If you want an affordable camera with more options, consider the much more flexible Samsung S850 or Canon PowerShot A630. If you simply want an easy-to-use, reliable camera, consider the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W55.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

chippers
06/02/2008, 09:35 PM

rating
7
/10

I bought mine before I went to Thailand as a carry everywhere camera and I'm extremely happy with it.
The secret is, turn the flash off, reducing power consumption & refresh time.
The ISO boost has worked wonders for most of my shots keeping the background as well, rather than spoiling it with a bright foreground.

I'll admit that it doesn't keep all the detail due to noise, but I only lost about 5 or 6 when the ISO went higher than 800.

The auto white balance chose the right colours which meant basically no colour corrections before publishing them online.

As a DSLR user, my experience has taught me to make the most of natural lighting, so using the in-built scene modes is a great way to slow shutter speeds for low light conditions.

Can't wait to see what they offer next?

Pros: *Good battery life when not using flash.
*Great colours and skin tones
*Good design, fits in pocket nicely
*Quick start up time
*Good quality movie mode with sound (for a compact camera)
*Lens shift Image stabilisation (VR)

Cons: *Refresh time when using flash
*VR doesn't work very well in movie mode
*Noisy when ISO is above 800

Report offensive comment

kaappoo
05/12/2007, 08:02 AM

rating
3
/10

A disappointment. After 2 month stopped focusing at all.

Pros: Quite good on paper. wide angle shooting mode(crop), 640*400 video with voice

Cons: Extremely slow flash recharge, battery life extremely short, USB2.0 is the SLOW one, extremely bad on focusing

Report offensive comment

robber
30/06/2007, 03:56 PM

rating
7
/10

Shot to shot seems quite ok to me.

Pros: At $269 it seemed much better than cost competitor.
Size is good.

Cons: Flash recycle is certainly painful.

Report offensive comment

  • Leave a comment

All fields marked with * are required

What do you think

Rate this product:

Need help? Read our guidelines for what each number rating represents.

Your e-mail will not be displayed

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars.

  • Canon EOS 50D

  • Which IXUS? Choosing the right Canon ultra-compact camera

  • Canon Digital IXUS 85 IS photo samples

  • Fujifilm FinePix J100

  • SLRs for savvy shooters

  • Which Nikon digital SLR?

  • Exposure: Zander Snape

  • Olympus E-520

  • Digital 3D photography made easy by Fujifilm

More articles »

Find the right digital camera

Brand
  • Multiple options can be selected

    Membership benefits

    Contact community members

    Contact community members

    Add friends or tech gurus to you contacts and send them messages. Sign up for a free CNET.com.au membership now!