Sony's entry-level dSLR, the Alpha DSLR-A200, delivers a just-the-facts-ma'am shooting experience. For the most part, it provides the average design, basic feature set, modest performance, and better-than-snapshot photo quality that typifies this market segment: not bad, but not notable in any way, either.
The 10.2-megapixel A200 is currently only available in Australia as a twin lens kit with the SAL-1870 18-70mm f3.5-5.6 and SAL-75300 75-300mm f4.5-5.6 lenses.
Design
At 635 grams with battery and CF card, the A200 weighs more than most of its competitors, despite its plastic-clad body. It feels solid, though, and the rubberised grip has a deep indent for your finger that makes the camera comfortable to hold. If you plan to connect the camera directly to your computer rather than use a card reader (which we don't recommend), then avoid the A200.
For one, the USB connector is located inside the CF card compartment, which means you have to leave the door open while downloading, potentially allowing all sorts of schmutz to get onto the card-slot contacts (and, if you're accident prone, providing a protrusion to hit and hurl the camera to the floor).
More important, Sony uses a proprietary combo USB/AV connector on all its dSLRs, for no reason that we can see other than to force you to buy a cable from them if you lose the bundled one. That just peeves us.
Operating the A200 is straightforward. There are direct-access controls for ISO sensitivity, exposure compensation, and drive/bracketing/self-timer modes, while flash, AF, white balance, AF area, and D-RangeOptimizer settings are grouped under a screen pulled up by the Fn button.
Features
The A200 supports wireless flash, uncommon but not unique in this price class, and we actually like the bare-bones implementation. Rather than grafting pro multichannel support on the camera, which can be quite confusing to configure, it's basically binary: on or off. The rest of its features -- and their implementations -- are pretty typical for its class, including sensor-shift image stabilisation and a 2.7-inch LCD. (For a complete list of features, download the PDF manual.) Like most, but not all, of the cameras in this class, the A200 lacks Live View shooting.
Performance
CNET Labs' tests indicate it wakes up and shoots very quickly -- in roughly half a second. Under good, high-contrast lighting, it focuses and shoots in just under a third of a second, rising to a moderate 1.2 seconds in dimmer conditions. Typically, it captures consecutive frames in 0.6 second, jumping up to 1.3 seconds with the built-in flash enabled. Its 2.8 frames-per-second continuous shooting speed falls around the class average. Also as is typical for this segment, it has limited non-JPEG burst shooting capabilities: only 3 frames raw+JPEG or 6 frames raw in burst mode. In casual testing, the image-stabilisation system delivered about 3 stops of latitude over what the reciprocal rule dictates -- 1/10 second versus 1/70 second for a 70mm focal length -- which is pretty standard.
(Seconds -- Shorter bars indicate better performance)
 |
Time to first shot | |
Raw shot-to-shot time | |
Shutter lag (dim light) | |
Shutter lag (typical) |
(Frames per second -- Longer bars indicate better performance)
We do have a few performance gripes, though. For one, the 2.7-inch LCD is very difficult to view in direct sunlight. Second, the focus indicators for the 9 off-centre focus points are lines (rather than squares), and very dim -- some people may have trouble seeing them. And the shutter, or at least the mirror flip it drives, sounds unusually loud.
Image quality
On the whole, the A200's photos looked okay, if unexceptional. It renders reasonable, if somewhat warm or cool automatic white balance, depending upon the lighting. In standard mode, exposures seem skewed too much toward the midtones -- probably to avoid blown-out highlights -- so images look a bit low contrast. Its noise profile looks good until ISO 800, at which point colour artifacts become obvious, but that's par for the course on low-end SLRs. And the kit lens we tested produced soft photos.
This is one of the first entry-level digital SLR cameras we've seen in 2008, so it's quite possible that we'll be back to reevaluate the Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 more favorably in the context of its competition. But for now, there are better, more interesting models from earlier years whose prices are dropping into its territory; the Nikon D40x or Canon EOS 400D if you're willing to forgo the image stabilisation, or the slightly more expensive Pentax K10D if you're not. You can even opt for the similar and still-available two-year-old Alpha DSLR-A100, if you don't shoot a lot at high ISO settings, and put the money you save toward a better lens.
Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!
Graphics001
21/08/2008, 01:03 PM
rating
8/10
so far, found to be a great camera for the money spent especially with the twin lense kit. With the use of addition acessories will prove to make this a desirable camera for entry level photographers
Pros: Supersteady shot
twin lense kit
Cons: weight
usb port
Report offensive comment
andrew
15/08/2008, 01:21 AM
rating
9/10
I'm confused...I have an old Minolta SLR with multiple lens, so I'm thinking lens cost is a pro - particularly with the image stablisation on the body. Everything else mentioned seemed to be rather subjective (i.e. "couldn't fault it, I just don't like it" sort of responses don't really cut it for me). So based on the facts in the article, it seems like a perfect camera, but the subjective review sours an otherwise positive view I have about CNet reviews.
Pros: Minolta lens compatibility
price
Cons: the article's subjectiveness
Report offensive comment
frog
14/08/2008, 10:25 PM
rating
10/10
bought the twin lens kit. Picture quality is great, image stabaliser in the body is very helpfull.
Pros: image stabaliser
cheaper than all competitors
good backward compatibility with older minolta lenses.
Cons: maybe the size
Report offensive comment
Peter Richardson
19/07/2008, 09:24 PM
rating
7/10
Using the 11-18mm wide angle Sony lens for indoor flash (inbuilt flash) shots the lens (with hood removed) produces a shadow in the centre bottom of the picture.
Report offensive comment
Steve
30/03/2008, 06:45 PM
rating
10/10
Excellent camera. Bought it with the additional Sony 18-250 lens. Amazing results so far. Love it.
Pros: In-camera stabilisation
User Friendly
Very comfy to hold
Cons: Nothing really
Report offensive comment
p
28/03/2008, 07:59 AM
rating
8/10
I'm comfortable with mine. Maybe I'm not advanced enough to desire more.
Report offensive comment
sam
22/03/2008, 09:24 PM
rating
10/10
the Sony may not stand out but what is better than it for the price??? come on, what does stand out Cnet? the Nikon D60 with weak image quality or the same as everytime before it EOS 450d????
Pros: everything
Cons: nothing
Report offensive comment