Five reasons not to buy an Apple iPad 2

commentary Australians woke up to the news this morning that the next generation of the Apple of Steve Jobs' eye will hit local shores on 25 March — a new tablet to salve our compulsive need for the latest technology and a new colour scheme to make sure nobody is in any doubt that we have the latest model.

Apple store

Are you passing the point of Apple no return? (Apple image, by John Loo, CC2.0)

For a few moments, we were elated.

But minutes after Jobs' presentation finished, the cynicism set in as publications started to tally up precisely what was new. And that tally didn't weigh in Apple's favour. With no iPhone 4 style 'Retina' screen, no multiple form factors, no real software upgrade or user interface overhaul and few extra ports, it's not hard to see why much of the initial reaction to the iPad 2 has been a collective, global "meh".

So here are five reasons why Australians, specifically, shouldn't buy the iPad 2.

1. It's the same as the old one

There's no doubt that Australians loved the first iPad. Analyst firm Telsyte believes some 400,000 of us would have been using a tablet of some sort by the end of 2010. With Telstra alone connecting some 100,000 iPads to its network so far, there's no doubt that the overwhelming majority of that 400,000 are iPads.

In other words, iPad hype reigned supreme in Australia last year, and the nation bought the device in droves. But as we've pointed out, the iPad 2 has no significant new features in comparison to the first iPad. So if you didn't buy the first iPad when it launched in Australia in mid-2010, why would you buy one now?

2. You don't need one

Common uses for the iPad include reading newspapers, magazines and books, browsing the internet, playing games and consuming multimedia such as movies, TV shows and music.

Well, here's a big, fat reality check: most of those functions are actually better performed in other ways. The overwhelming majority of Australia's newspapers and magazines are not available on the iPad. Meanwhile, Amazon's Kindle eBook store has a way bigger range than Apple's iBookstore, especially when it comes to those books actually available in Australia.

If you want to browse the internet on the move, why not do it on the iPhone, HTC Desire or BlackBerry that you already own? The same goes for listening to music. As for watching movies and TV on the road, if you want to stay legal and avoid BitTorrent, you had better buy a portable DVD player, as very few TV shows or movies are available for legal download on the iPad in Australia.

3. The competitive landscape is about to open up

Companies like Motorola, HTC, Samsung and LG have revealed great tablet devices similar to the iPad over the past month, and many of the tablets are expected to hit Australia in the middle of 2011, although some major companies like BlackBerry maker Research in Motion have not yet confirmed local launch dates for their offerings.

Some of the devices have fantastic features that the iPad doesn't have — especially when you factor in the ability for manufacturers to customise the Android platform being used by many. They also come in form factors that Apple doesn't provide, giving greater choice. In short, why would you buy an iPad 2, when we don't have the full picture yet on what tablets will be available in Australia? Hold off a few months and we'll know a lot more.

4. It costs too much

Even if you decide you definitely want a tablet device, why would you shell out the uber-dollars required to buy an iPad? Apple hasn't yet confirmed Australian pricing for the iPad 2, but if the US pricing model (where the price is the same) is applied down under, the cheapest price you'll get on an iPad 2 is $449 and that's for the low-end model, with just 16GB of storage and no 3G mobile broadband access.

For $269, by comparison, you can buy an Optus My Tab tablet, which provides many of the same functions as the iPad 2 — light browsing, email, reading and multimedia use — without being overpowered or overpriced. Better yet, it's a sturdy little beast that you can give to your kids to take to school or on holidays. If it breaks, the cost is not overwhelming to buy a new one.

If you just want the basics and a little more, why pay double for the iPad 2?

5. Apple fandom is so two years ago

Most of my friends belong to Australia's early technology adopters. They often buy the latest and greatest mobile phones, game consoles and games, PCs and laptops — and now, tablets — when they come out, because they want to be on the edge of the technology curve and are prepared to pay for the privilege.

Among this crowd, if you're an Apple fanboy with an iPhone, a MacBook Pro and an iPad, you're really just ... not cool. In fact, you're viewed as a bit of a conformist, the sort of person who would switch off their brain and be sucked into Steve Jobs' famous reality distortion field.

No, most of this crowd has switched their focus away from Apple over the past year as the Google Android platform has taken off in a big way. Why pay for Apple gear that is inherently limited to Jobs' personal specifications, many ask, when you can get the same hardware with more open software?

In mobile devices, Apple is becoming what Microsoft was in the late 1990s and early years of the 2000s — a monopolistic behemoth that controls its position in the market with an iron fist in a velvet glove. Do you really want to be an iClone?

Previous Story

Apple iPad 2: photos

Computers
Next Story

Apple iPad 2


Add Your Comment 60


Post comment as
 

Not a Fanboy posted a comment   

Seriously you call this journalism? I am not a fanboy by a long way but I also am not an Apple basher like this writer obviously is. You compare the Optus device with an iPad?? You have either not used either device or you are a brain-dead hack that is more interested in getting words on paper then putting across anything close to the truth.

Journalism is dead. Long live journalism!

 

Chichi posted a comment   

All of the reasons for not buying an iPad 2 seem to be right, but the thing is, these "reasons" do not seem to be a dealbreaker, especially considering the fact that the Australian tablet market is practically non-existent, unless you like those hideous tablets from Optus or Telstra which are more like budget phones from Lg from 2004.

You say we have the playbook, xoom, htc tablet and the new samsung tablet as competitors, HELLO, I doubt that they will even be released in australia. Motorola seems to be doubting whether or not Australia is even a viable market for its Xoom.

So the trump card against your argument is the basic fact that: THERE ARE NO COMPETITIVE SUBSTITUTES!

 

laikanuki posted a comment   

I have iPad and it appears the same things that really annoy me are still there on iPad2
1. Having to connect to iTunes. Aaaaarrrggghhh
2. Same message. "cannot play video"
3. Same message "safari cannot open page"
4. Cannot connect to USB Etc.etc
iPad nice hardware, useless functionality, designed for dummies.
Can't wait for the Android tablets, way more functional

 

Antinokia posted a comment   

Don't bag this woman. She has made a genuine attempt at writing an anti-Apple article. What's wrong with that? Nothing. Apple haters and queriers have the same right to write an article on Apple products like Pro-Apple writers do. I believe if you are reading this article expecting praise for the product then you came to the wrong place. If you want that, go to Joseph Hanlon's Five reasons to buy an iPad article. There Apple Zombies can culminate your Apple babble and weep when the iPad comes out. Remember that this woman is just portraying another side of the argument.

 

AlexH posted a reply   

I was probably harsh and I dont actually think Im good enough to write for CNET, but besides that I do not think that anyone on this thread is attacking the article for being anti-Apple. It is the quality of the writing and lack of substance to the arguments that are the problem. It would not have been too hard too come up with 5 genuine, well researched reasons that people should hold off on an iPad purchase, my brother had one and I would know. Multitasking is limited, production stinks compared to any laptop and internet caching is a nightmare! But the blatant judgement statements outlined in this article "its just not cool", "its the same as the old one" and the fairly obvious "you dont need one" show incredibly lazy journalism. Of-course I dont need one, its a luxury piece of tech indulgence, but so are 90% of the things that CNET reviews!

 

AlexH posted a reply   

Beside*

 

mick posted a reply   

I think the writer is male.


Sponsored Links
Tablets & E-readers

Recently Viewed Products