Format wars: the tech that should have won

Did you love Laserdisc? Were you bonkers over Betamax? Do you cry yourself to sleep because BeOS never hit the big time? Fret no more -- superdork Captain Tech is here to travel back in time and save the format losers that should have triumphed.

1. The quest begins
2. Betamax
3. Laserdisc
4. 8-track
5. High-definition audio
6. MiniDisc
7. BeOS
8. DTS
9. Atari ST
10. What life would be like

High-definition audio

What it was
High-definition audio consists of a couple of next-generation audio formats -- Super Audio CD and DVD-Audio -- that are pretty similar to CD in the way they operate, but are actually based on DVD technology. Because they have more space than CDs they can produce a far higher quality sound.

Why it lost
This is a classic case of a format war ruining what was a brilliant idea. With CDs continuing to sell well and with a boom in the digital music market, companies had a tough time persuading people that high-resolution audio was necessary. Combine that with the confusion of two competing formats and HD audio never really stood a chance. The discs also cost a fair bit more than regular CDs, which didn't exactly help the cause.

Why it should have won
Quite simply, these next-generation audio formats sound stunning. While CD is good quality, there are still some who argue vinyl is better. SACD and DVD-A address this by vastly increasing the audio quality and including the option for multi-channel surround sound. The copy protection is good too, which means less of that pesky piracy the music industry keeps banging on about.

The two high-definition audio formats are both essentially DVDs, with some slight tweaks. For example, SACD offers a cunning hybrid option, which means as well as a high-quality audio layer, there's a CD layer, which means the discs will work in any standard CD player -- although not all discs have this feature.

On the other hand, DVD-Audio is the audio format supported by the DVD Forum standards body, and the discs should be playable in any DVD player, which means a massive number of players already exist for the format.

Our fantasy outcome
Captain Tech has his work cut out here. Not only would he need to put an end to the format war, he would also have to get the public interested in high-definition audio. To do this, he'd have to start a large marketing campaign decrying the CD as old fashioned at the turn of the millennium in London's biggest white elephant, the Millennium Dome. As for finishing the format war, well, he'd have to pick his favourite format and brutally exterminate the other one.

Previous Story

Sanyo PLV-Z2000

Home Cinema
Next Story

2007: The best of home theatre


Add Your Comment 8


Post comment as
 

Haiqu posted a comment   

Captain Tech is on the right track. I waited for 6 months for a CD-4 Quadraphonic version of Thijs Van Leer's "Introspection" album, and eventually gave up when the record shop couldn't deliver. I've experimented with Ambisonic recording (awesome!), been an early licensee of HDCD technology and own both a Pioneer Minidisk recorder and a Sony MD-Walkman.

I do have to take him to task on one point though. BeOS may be gone, but the open-source replacement is ready for prime time, and by all accounts will be a viable alternative operating system well into the future. Visit http://www.haiku-os.org and download your CD image today!!

 

neeeo posted a comment   

Captain Tech rules!
Long live Captain Tech!
only he can save us from medocrity
and a fate far worse than death ;
poor sound and picture quality.
May the ones and zeros be with you
Captain Tech !

 

two-ears-good,four-ears-better posted a comment   

Comparing iPod with Mini-disc is not really the point. The two are different products for different purposes. Can you do high-quality field recordings with an iPod? I doubt it.

OTOH for the convenience of carrying around a great deal of reasonable quality music just to listen to, there are many MP3 hard-disc players around (not *just* iPod, let's remember!) which offer a more compact solution than Mini-disc.

There are many other issues like battery life, battery replacement, add-ons, etc, etc. Neither technology wins on all points.

 

canberra_photographer posted a comment   

An iPod is way better than those mini disc players because u would have to carry those mini-discs everywhere, and the iPod stores everything on its hard disk.

 

Peterk posted a comment   

Our friend from the ACT is not aware of Hi-MD introduced in 2003/4. 1 gb minidiscs that could record many hours of music (highly compressed) and be used for jpeg, word and other comptuer files.
ATRAC still sounds far superior to MP3

 

abuska posted a comment   

absolutely brilliant article guys.. thankyou

 

canberra_photographer posted a comment   
Australia

DTS a failure, every news Special Edition DVD has DTS from the major studios. They remastered the entire James Bond series into DTS and proudly make it a selling point. DTS is a success.

MiniDisc over iPod, the iPod can hold uncompressed WAV audio, MP3, AAC.
MD hold... ATRAC... and... well nothing else, just heavily compressed ATRAC.

DTS is the only things in this list deserving of being saved. Even high def audio isn't.

The world is moving towards digital content delivery through the internet.

 

canberra_photographer posted a comment   
Australia

Doesn't wear out over time? Laserdisc was netoriuous for so called "laser rot" and the size and materials used meant that discs were easily scratched. I'll take VHS anyday, though I would have prefered beta!




Sponsored Links
Home Cinema

Recently Viewed Products