Google wants people to stop googling
By Will Sturgeon on 17 August 2006

Google has said it intends to crack down on the use of its name as a generic verb, in phrases such as "to google someone."
The Internet search giant said such phrases were potentially damaging to its brand.
"We think it's important to make the distinction between using the word 'Google' to describe using Google to search the Internet and using the word 'google' to generally describe searching the Internet. It has some serious trademark issues," a representative for the search company said.
Julie Coleman, an authority on linguistics from the University of Leicester, said she could understand Google's concerns.
"The prestige associated with a trademark is lost if people use it generically, so I do see Google's point. They also do lots more than just search, so maybe they're reluctant for their brand name to be restricted in this way," Coleman said.
But Coleman added that once new words enter into common usage, it is impossible to stop their use.
"Google can't possibly stop the spread of the verb," Coleman said. "Normal people are using it in normal conversation and in writing, and they aren't likely to face legal proceedings."
What Google could do, said Coleman, is "force dictionaries to mention its origin in a trademarked brand name, which is what the Oxford English Dictionary already does."
Even if Google's attempts to stop this misuse of its trademark turn out to be in vain, many argue it shouldn't even be trying.
Members of the blogging community have suggested it is a sign that Google is losing its once-cool facade and that the search giant is taking itself too seriously.
One blogger also suggested Google has missed the obvious compliment in all this, which is that the use is evidence the company now owns the search industry.
"This should be the ultimate compliment, and I cannot believe Google sees it differently," blogger and computing graduate Frank Gruber wrote.
Steve Rubel, another blogger, branded it "one of the worst PR moves in history."
Morgan McLintic, a PR executive based in the heart of Silicon Valley, said Google should certainly learn when to love its addition to the English language.
"'Googling' is already common parlance for searching on the Internet," McLintic wrote. "And there is only one place you go to 'google,' so this is a good thing for Google with a capital 'G'. The media's use of the verb is simply a reflection of everyday use."
Google's move reflects the concerns of other businesses, such as Xerox, which has complained that its brand has become a generic term for photocopying respectively. Apple Computer is also taking action to defend "iPod."
AOL is another technology company that has fought the tendency of brands to become generic. It has contacting media outlets in the past over the use of "instant messenger" to describe any IM application, claiming that to be its brand.
Will Sturgeon of Silicon.com reported from London.
Topics: google, trademark, googling, brand
Related Articles
Google's antisocial downside
Google: Searching for answers
Google joins Xerox as a verb
Google Earth zooms in
Comments (4)
-
WITTYBOB commented on 22/08/2007 11:41 Report abuse
I think I'll have to "GOOGLE" this topic and see if it's available in a "POD"cast.
-
Christopher Butler commented on 07/09/2006 10:33 Report abuse
On March 14 1953, Raymond Chandler used the word Google (with cap G). Will he then be sued postumously? See: http://wordwing.com/content/view/34/40/
-
Chuck commented on 20/08/2006 13:49 Report abuse
Google doesn't want me using their name as a verb anymore? Fine then, from now on I'll yahoo the unfamiliar.
-
Andrew commented on 19/08/2006 10:10 Report abuse
Coca-cola does the same thing. It put a huge amount of effort in to stopping "Coke" from being used as a generic term for "cola". Without understanding the US trademark law too much, there is apparently a point where if a trademark can become deemed a generic term then the actual owner of that trademark can lose rights to actually defend the usage of their trademark by their competitors. Imagine Microsoft being able to say "Windows Live: the new way to google" without Google having the right to stop that usage. Google need to at least show an attempt to try and stop the generalisation of their trademark to be able to defend against competitive usage.
Post your own comment
Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.
ConnectMust read
-
Best free iPhone apps
If you're like us then the first button you pressed on your brand-spanking...
-
Channel 10 & the Web
Channel 10's threadbare online presence stands out among the other TV...
-
Speed up your Web downloads
When it comes to the Internet, speed is everything. Here are some top...
-
Internet Explorer 7 vs. Firefox 2
We put the latest browsers from Microsoft and Mozilla head-to-head and see...
-
FeedDemon 2
FeedDemon is a terrific RSS reader that can handle hundreds of...







