Did you love Laserdisc? Were you bonkers over Betamax? Do you cry yourself to sleep because BeOS never hit the big time? Fret no more -- superdork Captain Tech is here to travel back in time and save the format losers that should have triumphed.
2. Betamax
3. Laserdisc
4. 8-track
5. High-definition audio
7. BeOS
8. DTS
9. Atari ST
10. What life would be like
8-track
What it was
A simple tape format made up of a never- ending loop of tape and four 'programmes' which offered almost CD-like skipping between songs. Also known as Stereo 8, it was incredibly popular during the late 60s and early 70s.
Why it lost
Although 8-track was incredibly popular in the US, especially in cars, it eventually lost out to compact cassette, which brought with it a few features that 8-track didn't have, such as Dolby noise reduction and the ability to rewind the tapes.
Why it should have won
Nothing screams 'great idea' more than a tape that doesn't need to be rewound or turned over at the end of a side. Well, 8-track didn't have sides -- instead each tape had four stereo programmes. These programmes were selected by pressing a button on the front of the player. Alternatively, the next programme would be automatically played after the previous one had finished.
The humble 8-track also had the potential to save lives. With compact cassette you needed to mess about with rewind and fast-forward controls. This is fine if you're making mix tapes in your bedroom, but when you're driving around town you need to keep your eyes on the road. 8-track was so simple: you plugged in a cartridge and off it went.
Despite being remembered as a failure, it's important to remember that when Ford UK started offering players in its cars they shifted 65,000 units in the first year, far more than anyone expected.
Cart also lived on well into the 90s as a system for playing jingles on radio. Although slightly modified, it was the same perpetual loop with a tone that allowed fast queuing to the start of the recording. Ironically, it was pretty much replaced by fellow format loser MiniDisc, which allowed for a similar speed of queuing while being easy to record on.
Our fantasy outcome
Captain Tech loves 8-track, so to save it, all he would need to do is go back to the groovy 60s and introduce home recorders so people can make their own compilations. Oh, and having rewind and fast-forward on the decks would help sell a few more players.
Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!
canberra_photographer
30/12/2007 01:16 AM
Doesn't wear out over time? Laserdisc was netoriuous for so called "laser rot" and the size and materials used meant that discs were easily scratched. I'll take VHS anyday, though I would have prefered beta!
Report offensive content
canberra_photographer
30/12/2007 01:32 AM
DTS a failure, every news Special Edition DVD has DTS from the major studios. They remastered the entire James Bond series into DTS and proudly make it a selling point. DTS is a success. MiniDisc over iPod, the iPod can hold uncompressed WAV audio, MP3, AAC. MD hold... ATRAC... and... well nothing else, just heavily compressed ATRAC. DTS is the only things in this list deserving of being saved. Even high def audio isn't. The world is moving towards digital content delivery through the internet.
Report offensive content
abuska
30/12/2007 07:07 PM
absolutely brilliant article guys.. thankyou
Report offensive content
Peterk
04/01/2008 10:59 AM
Our friend from the ACT is not aware of Hi-MD introduced in 2003/4. 1 gb minidiscs that could record many hours of music (highly compressed) and be used for jpeg, word and other comptuer files. ATRAC still sounds far superior to MP3
Report offensive content
canberra_photographer
11/01/2008 09:56 AM
An iPod is way better than those mini disc players because u would have to carry those mini-discs everywhere, and the iPod stores everything on its hard disk.
Report offensive content
two-ears-good,four-ears-better
29/05/2008 06:33 PM
Comparing iPod with Mini-disc is not really the point. The two are different products for different purposes. Can you do high-quality field recordings with an iPod? I doubt it. OTOH for the convenience of carrying around a great deal of reasonable quality music just to listen to, there are many MP3 hard-disc players around (not *just* iPod, let's remember!) which offer a more compact solution than Mini-disc. There are many other issues like battery life, battery replacement, add-ons, etc, etc. Neither technology wins on all points.
Report offensive content