How Apple minimises its tax bill: report

Following on from its earlier reports on Foxconn and Apple's practice of sending manufacturing overseas, The New York Times is once again putting Apple under the microscope, with a new, in-depth report about the tactics the company uses to cut its global tax bill by billions of dollars every year.

"Almost every major corporation tries to minimise its taxes, of course," the report said. Nevertheless, "Apple serves as a window on how technology giants have taken advantage of tax codes written for an industrial age, ... ill-suited to today's digital economy."

The report claims Apple has been a pioneer in developing ways to sidestep taxes, and that companies seeking to do the same have used its methods as templates.

The article comes as Apple is, perhaps, still trying to move beyond past negative reports regarding the practices of manufacturing partner Foxconn. Apple has also been criticised by some in regard to US job creation and the hugely profitable company's lack of factories in the US; about which The Times published articles in January, setting off a wave of discussion.

This time around, The Times reporedt that Apple essentially sets up its business to take advantage of parts of the US and the world that have lower tax rates for corporations. For instance, though its headquarters are located in California and it has no manufacturing or customer-care operations in Nevada, Apple set up a small office in Reno — a mere 320km from its Cupertino HQ — to collect and invest its profits. California's corporate tax rate is 8.84 per cent. Nevada's? Zero.

That's just one example. Citing unnamed former executives at the company, The Times reported that Apple's innovation does not lie solely with product development. The company has also led the way with tax-dodging strategies, such as the "Double Irish with a Dutch Sandwich":

Apple, for instance, was among the first tech companies to designate overseas salespeople in high-tax countries in a manner that allowed them to sell on behalf of low-tax subsidiaries on other continents, sidestepping income taxes, according to former executives. Apple was a pioneer of an accounting technique known as the "Double Irish with a Dutch Sandwich", which reduces taxes by routing profits through Irish subsidiaries and the Netherlands and then to the Caribbean. Today, that tactic is used by hundreds of other corporations — some of which directly imitated Apple's methods, say accountants at those companies.

With practices like this, the report claims, Apple has been able to "allocate about 70 per cent of its profits overseas", though "the majority of Apple's executives, product designers, marketers, employees, research and development and retail stores are in the US".

The Times also said that the advent of digital goods has changed the game for companies. The report gives details of an Apple subsidiary in Luxembourg: "The only indication of the subsidiary's presence outside is a letterbox with a lopsided slip of paper reading "iTunes SARL". But because of that presence, The Times reported that songs, TV shows and apps downloaded via iTunes by people across Africa, Europe and the Middle East are recorded as having been sold in Luxembourg.

The advantages of Luxembourg are simple, say Apple executives. The country has promised to tax the payments collected by Apple and numerous other tech corporations at low rates if they route transactions through Luxembourg. Taxes that would have otherwise gone to the governments of Britain, France, the United States and dozens of other nations go to Luxembourg instead, at discounted rates.

"We set up in Luxembourg because of the favourable taxes," said Robert Hatta, who helped oversee Apple's iTunes retail marketing and sales for European markets until 2007. "Downloads are different from tractors or steel, because there's nothing you can touch, so it doesn't matter if your computer is in France or England. If you're buying from Luxembourg, it's a relationship with Luxembourg."

The result, The Times reported, citing government and corporate data, is that tech companies — including Apple, Google, Yahoo and Dell — are among the least taxed, paying worldwide cash taxes in the last two years that were one third less than those paid by other companies listed in the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index.

The paper claims that without the tax strategies it uses, Apple would have paid US$2.4 billion more in federal taxes in the US, last year. As it stands, though, the company paid a rate of 9.8 per cent compared to non-tech representative Walmart's 24 per cent.

The article goes on to discuss the budget crunch that has hit many, if not most, states in the US. It points out that the issue is complex; Apple and other tech companies do create jobs and wealth that remain in the US, and they also engage in significant charitable activities. But > some feel that those things don't make up the loss of tax revenue. The article quoted Brian Murphy, president of De Anza College, a community college near Apple HQ and where Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak went to school from 1969 to 1974. The school is severely threatened by the current budget crunch.

"I just don't understand it," Murphy told The Times. "I'll bet every person at Apple has a connection to De Anza. Their kids swim in our pool. Their cousins take classes here. They drive past it every day, for Pete's sake. But then they do everything they can to pay as few taxes as possible."

The Times relates an episode involving late co-founder Steve Jobs and the Cupertino City Council. During the approval process for Apple's new campus, then councilwoman Kris Wang asked how residents might benefit, and suggested that Apple might provide free Wi-Fi to the city, as Google had in neighbouring Mountain View.

"See, I'm a simpleton," Jobs had replied. "I've always had this view that we pay taxes, and the city should do those things. That's why we pay taxes. Now, if we can get out of paying taxes, I'll be glad to put up Wi-Fi." He then suggested that if the council was unhappy, Apple could move — and take with it the many millions of dollars it pays in property taxes annually. Wang dropped the Wi-Fi idea.

"We're proud to have Apple here," she told The Times for the article. "But how do you get them to feel more connected?"

For its part, Apple provided The Times with a statement that said, among other things, that the company "has conducted all of its business with the highest of ethical standards, complying with applicable laws and accounting rules", that the company is "incredibly proud of all of Apple's contributions" and that Apple "pays an enormous amount of taxes, which help our local, state and federal governments".

Via CNET and The New York Times



Add Your Comment 1


Post comment as
 

MatthewP6 posted a comment   

If it's legal then the governments need to tighten these loopholes!

And Hatta's comment that: "Downloads are different from tractors or steel, because there's nothing you can touch, so it doesn't matter if your computer is in France or England. If you're buying from Luxembourg, it's a relationship with Luxembourg" supports the argument that downloadable purchases should be globally priced (varied only to reflect taxes and exchange rates), not this "Oh let's charge Australia 40% more than everyone else".




Sponsored Links

Recently Viewed Products