It's a nice day for an iPod wedding

By on 21 September 2005

As a bride-to-be, Jessica Spence was taking extra care to note the details at a friend's wedding recently.

One thing that stood out to her was an idle-looking DJ who hit a few buttons on his laptop and appeared to take the rest of the night easy.

"I swear to god, the DJ was playing Solitaire throughout the dinner and cocktail hour," Spence noted in an online forum at wedding-planning site TheKnot.com. "It seems sort of silly to pay someone a lot of money to sit at a laptop and put on songs when we can do the exact same thing."

With their confidence in wedding DJs dented, Spence and her fiance are counting on their iPod to provide the musical entertainment at their wedding reception later this month. They're among a growing number of couples making personal music players a central part of their big day.

Keeping wedding budgets in check is one reason couples are going the digital-DJ route. According to wedding-planning guide Bridal Bargains, professional DJs charge an average of $600 per wedding. A live band can run upwards of $1,000. If a couple has already plunked down $400 or so for an iPod or an iRiver, and spent hours refining their digital-music collection, it's easy to see why a DJ might seem superfluous.

"What could be easier?" said Lori Leibovich, editor of IndieBride.com, a Web site for brides. "You bring it, you program it, it sounds great. It doesn't surprise me at all that more people are doing it."

Do-it-yourself wedding music has emerged as a popular discussion topic on IndieBride's discussion forums, as well as those at TheKnot.com. In another signal that the trend is on the rise, the latest edition of the best-selling book "Bridal Bargains" features a section on "the iPod wedding."

Celebrities are looking into iPods as DJs, too. Rock star Alanis Morissette, who's engaged to actor Ryan Reynolds, has said during recent interviews that she may use an iPod at her wedding next year.

Indulging your inner DJ
 Saving money obviously isn't the only motivation. Many couples view their wedding music as an opportunity to express themselves and put a personal stamp on their event. A digital-music player seems to set a more relaxed tone, too, one bride-to-be said.

"I think it will really add to the feel of the night not being so staged," said Emily Mighdoll, who is planning to use an iPod at her wedding next year. "There's music, but no one will be telling us what to do the whole night. It's also sort of neat being able to control a piece of how the party goes."

It's also the ultimate way to indulge a bride or groom's inner disc jockey. Grooms, in particular, find that aspect appealing, Mighdoll said.

"My fiance is definitely an audiophile and has tons and tons of music--anything we'd want a DJ to play and more," she said. "He's definitely selecting the playlists." (Mighdoll, however, said she's retaining veto power over the song selection.)

But do-it-yourself wedding music is not as simple as it might sound. For one thing, most couples find that they need to borrow or rent a sound system, including speakers, amplifiers, cables and a microphone. Rental costs can easily mount up.

Couples may also want to ask a trusted friend or family member to play MC and manage music transitions from dinner to dancing. Others advise using a laptop to sidestep some of pocket-size players' limitations, such as some iPods' 2- or 3-second pause between songs. Backing up music to a CD in case of a technical malfunction is also not a bad idea.

Music selection can also be tricky, a former radio DJ writes on IndieBride's online forum. "From a DJ's perspective, the music is not for you," she writes. "You are not playing your favourite songs. You are playing songs people want to hear and that people want to dance to."

She recommends sticking to crowd pleasers like "YMCA" by the Village People and "Whip It" by Devo.

Professional DJs say all of this detail is too much for most amateurs to handle. That's why the technology isn't putting any DJs out of business, said Jim Tremayne, editor of DJ Times magazine.

"A good, experienced, professional mobile DJ will offer more than music selection," Tremayne said in an e-mail interview. "That DJ will offer the timing that an iPod can't. He'll do introductions. He'll play the music at the exact time that you want. He'll offer the expertise of someone who's done this hundreds of times."

Topics: digital, music, player, ipod, dj, wedding, djs, couple

Related Articles

Comments (8)

  • Still Not sure commented on 29/05/2009 01:14 Report abuse

    I have heard both arguments and I really think that i can set things up so that i dont need a dj. We have two computers we are going to set up is one fails. Itunes lets you select the delay you want so you can down play the transition time between songs and as long as there is a variety of music on there then that is fine.. a little of this a little of that and some crowd pleasers thrown in... If nothing else someoen wants a special request then we have wireless internet. I am not going to please every guest. If i tried that i's be gray by the time the wedding is over, and some will be unhappy period no matter what you do. but when it comes to it i am the friggin bride right? So we are going without a dj and i look at it this way, people are coming for a wedding, and to mingle and be social. if they dance then that is just an added bonus.

  • Us either commented on 22/04/2009 23:45 Report abuse

    We have no choice in the matter - our venue is not licenced for music, except their own private music and I'm hoping that I can actually come across some advice that helps me figure out how the heck to do this!

  • No DJ for us commented on 10/03/2009 08:42 Report abuse

    I completely agree with capable bride, we have a band to get us all going after that the Ipod will come out. The venue has a sound system us and our guests are choosing the songs and a friend has a contact for the lights £500 saved. The same goes for flowers, photos and the cake. There are alot of skilled people out there who dont need to be paid a "wedding" rate.

  • capable bride commented on 31/10/2008 20:38 Report abuse

    ...or if you already have the equipment, and friends willing to mc, and your guests have already supplied you with lists of the songs they'd most like to hear, why not exercise a little creative control, save $600, and ditch the dj? The only people here who are insisting couples must hire a dj are people with money to gain. If you plan thing out in advance, there is no reason why you should have to pay $600 to a stranger to hustle you through your wedding reception. As for Nigel's whining, I am baking my own cake, and I am having a friend take the pictures -- we are both perfectly qualified to do so. There is no reason to pay top dollar to a professional for them to do something you can do yourself.

  • Owner of a large wedding venue commented on 01/02/2008 13:49 Report abuse

    Why take on the added stress putting together the tunes the sound system and lights by the time you rent everything you need it will cost you at least 500.00 and hours and hours of time plus do you really want to incovienence one of your guests to set up and run the show?If you hire a pro it will be better than anything you can come up with. The day is about everyone who came to share it having a good memerable time not about making everyone listen to the BG taste in music. Any Bride/Groom that thinks its more important that they hear what they want regardless of what the other people like is selfish and maybe should grow up a bit before they tie the knot.

  • Nigel2112 commented on 01/12/2007 17:53 Report abuse

    Welllll, it may seem like a nice idea but then you could also get a friend to take the photos and another to drive the limo. Her sister could bake the cake and make the dress while you're at it. No, nothing really beats a extroverted DJ with a rockin sound system and 10,000 songs at his disposal. That's why a DJ gets paid to be a DJ, you can't do what they do, iPod or not. This is a case of a journalist seeing three couples using iPods for their wedding receptions. Thinking he spots a trend he goes haywire and writes a piece like this to use on a low-news day.

  • ellie323 commented on 03/08/2007 04:45 Report abuse

    You don't get it-- the wedding is FOR the Bride and Groom... You make it seem like "WHo cares about the bride and grrom- all that matters is what their guests want". I have seen a good friend just about cry at her wedding because the DJ was not following their list that they all had agreed on. You're always going to have a few guests who want different music-- but who's paying for their dinner, and for YOU to be there? All I know is that I'm going with the hand ol' Ipod. I know I can trust it to play some great music.

  • Dj Anthony commented on 31/07/2007 12:07 Report abuse

    Ha, so you think you can be in DJ using an IPOD? Goodluck. I have been a wedding DJ for over 10 years boasting over 800 weddings. I can assure you that playing music to wedding guests is a little harder than ramping your IPOD up with some of your lame tunes. I have seen it so many many times, a weding couple want the Dj to play the tunes that they personally like and the guests hate them. I suggest you delay your wedding, save up your $600 bucks and hire a professional for the day.

Post your own comment

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect
Nokia E75 Email made easy. Find out why.
Your iPhone will be happier with Optus.

Must read