Kodak Easyshare 5300 All-in-One

By Alex Kidman on 30 October 2007

It's not surprising that Kodak's foray into cheap AIO printing does its best work with photos. We just wish it did better with text.

Editor's rating:7.5 User rating:2.1
  • Good: Simple installation • Good value printing
  • Bad: Can't edit or crop photos from the control panel • Photo printing is four-ink, not six-ink • Twitchy print head installation
  • Specs: Inkjet • See more specifications
  • RRP: AU$299.00

Design
While Kodak has a long and historic association with the printed image, as a company it's historically only really dabbled in PC-connected printers, usually with a strict photo-centric outlook. That's not that surprising for a camera company, when you think about it.

The Easyshare 5300 AIO represents a departure for the company, then. While it will certainly handle photo printing, as you'd expect, it's also a fully featured AIO printer of documents, scanner of documents and copier of (you guessed it) documents. And other things during drunk home office parties, but we'll leave that bit up to your imagination.

Speaking of imagination, however, the one striking thing about the 5300, especially as it's a Kodak product, is how essentially plain it looks. It's as though there was a committee of Kodak designers who were told to design an AIO printer. They did so, went back, and were told to make it look more, well, printery. The end result is a very generic AIO unit. That's not a bad thing per se, but given how swish many Kodak products look, the 5300 just seems rather plain and ordinary.

Installation of the 5300 involves the usual routine of unsticking seemingly hundreds of those tiny bits of plastic tape (in the 5300's case, they're bright orange), installing the print head and printer cartridges and printing a calibration page, which must then be scanned. We initially had some trouble getting the printer to accept that we had in fact installed the print head as advised; we're still not entirely sure why it finally accepted that we had.

Features
The 5300 uses a simplified ink system -- only two tanks are ever required -- one smaller black cartridge, and one truly colossal colour/photo unit. This does give the unit simplicity, but at the obvious cost that if you run out of, say, blue, you've got to replace all the colours simultaneously.

It features a three-inch colour display on the right hand side of the top of the printer, memory card slots and the option to add Bluetooth printing via an adaptor. The display can be used for very simple non-PC photo editing from external memory sources.

Most printer manufacturers are keen -- possibly obsessionally so -- for you to use only their inks and papers. Kodak naturally enough doesn't buck this trend; the 5300 is optimised for Kodak Photo Paper, and it's claimed that the printer will sense the paper being used and use optimal print settings for each paper type.

Kodak's big pitch for the 5300 -- you can't in fact miss it, as it's plastered all over the unit's box -- is that it offers cheaper printing. Kodak suggests that the black cartridges (AU$14.99) are good for just under 350 pages with 5 percent ink coverage, and the colour cartridges (AU$24.99) will do around 105 photos. That breaks down in Kodak's world at around 4 cents per black page, or 24 cents for a 10x14cm photo print. Part of that cost saving comes from the fact that the cartridges don't include a print head; whether over time that leads to a gunked up print head requiring a whole new 5300 is something we didn't have 12 months to test.

Drivers are provided for Windows (XP or Vista) or Mac OS X (10.4.8 or better). We initially tried testing on a Mac OS X 10.5, but found the drivers wouldn't fully install; hopefully as Leopard is so new (at the time of writing) this will be rectified soon. We had no problems installing under Windows Vista Ultimate Edition.

Performance
Kodak claim a print speed of up to 32ppm for monochrome printing, and up to 22ppm for colour with the 5300. Like most manufacturer claims, we took this with a grain of salt, and applied a common document to the 5300 for testing purposes. Our moderately complex test document took 48 seconds to print its first copy, and only managed a meagre 1.25ppm in our tests.

The other facet of the 5300's offering is naturally enough photo printing. Here the 5300 performed much better, spitting out very good quality 4x6 photos in around one minute a piece, even for complex print jobs. While we do see photo labs offering better priced deals than the typical 24 cents/print cost claimed by Kodak, it's never by that much, and the convenience of being able to pick and choose your photos at home, and at your leisure, can't be overstated.

As you'd expect from Kodak, the 5300 does its best work with photographs. As a direct document printer, it's a little less exciting, but anything that forces the cost of prints down in a competitive market deserves applause.

Topics: kodak, easyshare, aio, multifunction, 5300, printer, print, photo

Comments (9)

  • plonker gave 3/10 on 17/08/2009 14:55 Report abuse

    • Good: nil
    • Bad: printer heads need replacing after 3months

    never again

  • CODER2 gave 1/10 on 02/07/2009 06:32 Report abuse

    • Good: LOOKS IMPRESSIVE
    • Bad: PRINTS AWFUL

    i HAVE HAD TO HAVE THE PRINTER HEAD REPLACED THREE TIMES AND THEN KODAK SENT A WHOLE NEW PRINTER. THIS ONE WORKED FOR L,ESS TIME THAN THE ORIGINAL AND THEN I NEEDED A NEW PRINT HEAD FOR THAT ONE. TALK TO A TECH WHO INFORMED ME THAT KODAK WAS IN SUCH A HURRY TO GET THESE OUT ON THE MARKET THAT THEY DID IT WITH A SOFTWARE THT WAS NOT CONDUSIVE. HE SENT ME NEW SOFT WARE AND TO THIS DAY (4 MONTHS LATER) MY PRINTER STILL DOES NOT WORK, AT ALL. WILL NVER BUY ANOTHER ONE!!!!!

  • Rebkee gave 3/10 on 30/05/2009 11:22 Report abuse

    • Good: It Looks Good
    • Bad: It is a mulit-MALFUNCTION printer

    I own two of the 5300 printers and neither would qualify to be a good boat anchor. They worked fairly well for a little while, then the print head problems started. Heads on both have been replaced and they worked for a little while then qiut. The one I have in Florida I replaced with an HP and the one here in Delaware with a canon. I am very dissapointed that Kodak has put these turkeys on the market and suck people into buying them based of lower cost ink cartridges. Kodak used to be a good company but those days are long gone.

  • JC gave 3/10 on 13/02/2009 12:37 Report abuse

    • Good: Was a relatively cheap AIO printer to start with...
    • Bad: ...but you get what you pay for. Rapidly dying after one year.

    Just over a year old and rapidly deteriorating. Poor print quality, needs constant head cleaning to print just one B&W document and has begun to use ink at a prodigious rate. Bought a black cartridge a few weeks ago that was empty!! Clunky and slow. Now looking for an alternative.

  • Kate Withheld gave 2/10 on 28/11/2008 10:10 Report abuse

    • Good: After six months use i can't think of one thing i like.
    • Bad: 5300 Slower than any printer I have ever used. Huge footprint. Fiddley to use across all options
      No one stocks the ink cartridges as stores no longer sell the printer - I can see why.

    What you pay for is not what was advertised.

  • no_fear74_1999 gave 1/10 on 21/10/2008 21:51 Report abuse

    Forget it spent the last 48 hours trying to get it working doesnt like xp!!!!
    Stick to making cameras Kodak

  • cybiii gave 1/10 on 23/06/2008 05:32 Report abuse

    • Good: cheap cartridges
    • Bad: Knocks me off the internet sometimes. Have to turn printer on to print anything. Dell computers are really incompatable with printer software.

    Don't buy if you have a Dell computer

  • Kate gave 3/10 on 06/06/2008 14:52 Report abuse

    • Good: Looks good, but has too large a footprint
    • Bad: Will not/cannot print borderless prints.
      The accompanying Easy Share software is a nightmare - add photos, shut down & the next time opened it announces all the photos have been lost or deleted and have large white questions marks over each one. The prints cannot be edited or rotated. Ink quality is variable, even when using premium Kodak paper.

    Disappointing in that the performance is inconsistent.

  • Bigien gave 2/10 on 16/03/2008 20:09 Report abuse

    • Good: Potentially cheap printing
    • Bad: I note the cheapness of the ink may be masked because the cartridges do not have their own print heads - so that will be another expense if I get it working.

    In settingn things up the first print was terrible so the calibration also not good. Then the message that the print head had come loose stopped any further activity. Worst setup I have ever had from about 7 printers of my own and others I have assisted with.

Post your own

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 & A..F

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

The Explain Series

Where to buy Kodak Easyshare 5300 All-in-One

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder

Recently viewed products