Lexmark X4550

By Felisa Yang on 23 July 2007

The Lexmark X4550 offers what most all-in-ones in this price range don't: wireless networking. Casual home users who value network-readiness will love that feature, but users who want better print quality will be happier with a different machine.

Editor's rating:6.4 User rating:5.5
  • Good: Built-in wireless networking • Good colour scans • Onboard memory card slots and PictBridge port • Speedy text prints
  • Bad: Print quality needs improvement • Very slow 4x6 photo prints
  • Specs: Inkjet • See more specifications
  • RRP: AU$199.00 • Where to buy? Check price listings

The Lexmark X4550 is a high-end version of the X3550, which we reviewed recently. The two printers offer the same design and feature set, with the exception that the X4550 adds wireless networking for an additional AU$70 (though it lacks an Ethernet port for wired networking). The X4550 is also rated to perform more quickly than the X3550, so the focus this review will be on performance since the two printers are so similar otherwise. (For an overview and analysis of the X4550's design, feature set, and support package, please refer to the review of the X3550.)

Overall, the Lexmark X4550 produces mediocre prints and is a bit slow at tasks other than text printing. Its big draw is the fact that not only is it a AU$199 network-ready machine, but it comes with wireless networking standard. If you're a casual home user who prioritises network-readiness, the Lexmark X4550 is a bargain. But if your focus is on print quality, check out the Canon Pixma MP460.

When compared to its comparably priced competition, the Lexmark X4550 proved to be quick with text prints and greyscale scans. But it was positively sluggish at graphics prints and 4x6 photos, as well as pokey with colour scans. It scored 7.66 pages per minute for black text, a full page faster than the Canon Pixma MP510. But it scored a slow 1.04ppm for colour graphics. Even worse was its photo print speed: a mere 0.40ppm for a 4x6 photo. The HP Photosmart C5280 was the next slowest, but still nearly doubled the pace with a score of 0.76ppm. The X4550 came back with greyscale scans -- 5.74ppm -- but faltered with colour scans -- 4.77ppm. Comparing the X4550 to the X3550, the former beat the latter soundly at text prints but fell a bit behind with graphics prints and scans. It was soundly trounced, too, in 4x6 photo prints.

CNET Labs' inkjet multifunction speed tests (pages per minute)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Colour scan  
Greyscale scan  
4x6 photo  
Graphics  
Text  
Lexmark X4550
4.77 
5.74 
0.4 
1.04 
7.66 
Canon Pixma MP510*
5.2 
5.28 
1.26 
2.09 
6.37 
Canon Pixma MP460
5.6 
5.68 
1.36 
1.62 
5.8 
HP Photosmart C5280
8.1 
3.26 
0.76 
2.07 
5.53 
Lexmark X3550
4.45 
5.36 
0.77 
1.9 
4.34 
Note: *The Canon Pixma MP510's photo score is for an 8x10 print.

CNET Labs' inkjet multifunction quality
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Colour scan  
Greyscale scan  
Photo  
Graphics  
Text  
Canon Pixma MP460
Fair 
Good 
Excellent 
Excellent 
Excellent 
Canon Pixma MP510
Good 
Good 
Excellent 
Excellent 
Good 
HP Photosmart C5280
Excellent 
Good 
Good 
Good 
Fair 
Lexmark X4550
Good 
Fair 
Fair 
Fair 
Fair 

The X4550's text print quality left a lot to be desired on our tests. Black text tended toward dark grey rather than true black. Additionally, we saw a lot of jagged edges and wicking, even though we printed on Lexmark's premium paper. The colour graphics print suffered from some of the same problems. Straight edges showed jaggedness instead of clean, sharp lines. The colour had a faded look and the photo elements were a bit grainy. And colour blocks showed very faint horizontal striations. The 4x6 photo print was also just okay. Details need to be sharpened, and we saw evidence of graininess and horizontal striations, though they weren't as evident as what we saw in the graphics prints. The photo colour could also stand to be a bit brighter and warmer.

The greyscale scan showed obvious compression in both ends: we lost details in both the shadow and highlight areas of the image, though otherwise, details were sharp. The X4550 did its best work with the colour scan: colours were true and details sharp. Overall, the X4550 will suffice for casual home users, but more demanding users should look at the Canon Pixma MP460 -- the same amount of money will get you better print quality across the board, though text prints will be bit slower, and it's not network-ready.

Topics: copy, lexmark, multifunction, print, scan, x4550, all in one

Comments (5)

  • bogus1 gave a review on 25/10/2009 08:30

    • Good: Looks nice
    • Bad: Unreliable connections and functions

    When it works it is nice. Wireless is very erratic. I have no problem with any other wireless devices in my home. This thing just stops working. USB connected not much better. Scanning has NEVER worked!

  • oban gave 6/10 on 10/10/2008 20:12

    • Good: Wireless sets you free
    • Bad: Wirelesscan be fiddly to set up: a good wirelss signal is CRITICAL for setup.

    Good low-use printer. Wirelss can be difficult to set up, but was able to be done for printing and scanning. I had a warranty issue: rolls at the infeed not picking up the paper. First call for help resulted in instruction "remove print cartridges and shake upside down". Not reasurring at all! Second call was more logical and resulted in Lexmark exchanging the unit in a professional manner.

  • NEB007 gave 8/10 on 23/09/2008 22:17

    • Good: Good all round multifunction, with great scanning features and reasonable printing

      Wireless - simply convenient

      The price - $90.00 with the rebate - seriously how can you complain about quality when the price is soooo low!
    • Bad: Wireless can be tricky to setup

    I have to say that this is one of the best purchases i have made in a long time. In fact, i don't know what all the complaining is about.

    The pleasant fellow at office works pointed me to its direction, "this is the one you wont". To say the least i was sceptical, having never bought a Lexmark product before, but i was happily surprised.

    Scanning/Copying: excellent - for both text and images i found the quality to be more than acceptable.

    Printing: Ok, its not super good, but its not all bad. In my instance, i found that printing from InDesign PDF produced better than expected quality, especially comparing screen to print colour results. Not as bad as people say..

    Wireless: Took me about 20 minutes to setup, but its not rocket science! Works like a charm - printing and scanning wirelessly = :)

    Price: AU$

  • aslkjdfhuiwerwfsdf gave 2/10 on 09/07/2008 10:47

    • Good: Compact. Wireless printing
    • Bad: Wireless scanning doesn't work for most people.

    Scanning over the network fails for most users. Lexmark won't fix the problem. I won't ever trust them again.

  • Trimega gave 6/10 on 21/09/2007 16:27

    • Good: Wireless
      Affordable
      Easy set up
      Cashback offer
    • Bad: Print quality merely acceptable.

    Well, they're right about print quality not being exactly brilliant, but it is acceptable if you're just printing plain old Word docs. I love the convenience of wireless. Also, I got mine for only $150 after cashback so, not complaining. I still have a "proper" printer as standby when I want photo printing.

Post your own

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 & A..F

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

The Explain Series

Where to buy Lexmark X4550

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder

Recently viewed products