commentary In the '90s, when the MP3 was new, it was difficult to predict the medium's effect on the music industry and our culture. Today, the results of the MP3 revolution are starting to show, and I sometimes wonder what we won.
It's fitting that 2008 marks the 10-year anniversary of two of the first MP3 players, the Eiger Labs MPMan F10, and the Rio PMP300, but chances are you didn't listen to a first-gen MP3 player in 1998. With the first iPod still three years off, most of us were in the heights of our compact disc addiction 10 years ago, content to hear our music on portable CD players. Hell, some of us still listened to cassettes.
If nothing else, we've certainly redefined our notions of portability over the last 10 years.
(Credit: Donald Bell/CNET Networks)
The Sony Discman pictured above belongs to me. I never use it, but I like holding on to it because it reminds me of how amazing I once thought CDs were. Sure, they would skip like crazy, get scratched, or even break, but compact discs were the first medium to usher in the idea of "permanent" music -- albums that (if treated kindly) would never degrade over time. After a lifetime of warped LPs and worn-out cassettes, CDs seemed almost magical.
Today, most of us take for granted that our MP3s won't wear out or skip. In fact, there's tons of antiquated annoyances we no longer worry about in the age of the MP3. For instance, when was the last time you had to special-order your music at a record store and wait a week or more for it to arrive? When was the last time you wanted to hear an album you know you own but couldn't locate in the mess of your apartment? As the music in our lives has evaporated into noncorporeal ones and zeros, the troubled memories of acquiring and maintaining a physical music collection are quickly fading into the past.
Despite the advantages of the MP3, I'm willing to wager that somewhere in your home you have a shelf, closet, or box filled with CDs, records, or cassettes (maybe even MiniDiscs). Why do we hang on to these antiques? Is it nostalgia? Is it the fear of losing something we can't regain? Or are we just lazy?
Call it the MP3-era hangover, but even as online music providers are finally offering the DRM-free downloads we asked for years ago, I'm starting to realise that my fascination with the MP3 is starting to wane. As a music fan, I can't completely accept that MP3s are the end of the line. I won't be reviving my old Discman anytime soon, but I can't help but wonder if we've lost more than we realize in the process of virtualising our music collections.
I want to hear what you guys think, but to start you off, here's my list of music listening habits I had in 1998 that for reasons directly or indirectly related to the advent of the MP3, have died off. Admittedly, some of these habits are also related to the difference between being 19 and 29 (you can decide which are which).
Borrowing music
I know this may sound weird considering all the P2P music "sharing" going on these days, not to mention music-focused social networks such as Last.fm, but I miss borrowing CDs from friends. Like lending out a good book, lending music used to mean the lender actually gave up something, and that sacrifice imbued the music with personal meaning. Borrowing physical media also involves face-to-face interaction, oftentimes leading to great conversations. The modern age of copying, uploading, and linking to music has allowed me to discover new music at a much faster rate, but those discoveries seem much less personal.
Album artwork and liner notes
As far back as I can remember, whenever I brought home a new cassette or CD I would pop it in my stereo and immediately look over the album artwork and liner notes. Back then, I remember feeling ripped off if a group didn't include printed lyrics, but these days, I don't think twice that most of my music collection exists as a grid of basic metatags. Sure I can always jump on a band's MySpace page or Wikipedia entry if I want to know where they're from, what they're singing about, who their drummer is, or what their album cover looks like at full size, but I wish that information was still a part of the "product."
Used music
I spent more than two years of my life working in a new and used record store in Sacramento, where used CDs outsold new CDs about four to one. Used CDs not only offered our customers an inexpensive way to acquire new music, it gave people who were bored with their music a way to put money back in their pocket.
Putting aside my nostalgia for used music stores, I think we forget that MP3s are the first music format consumers cannot legally resell. Maybe I'm weird, but over the past 10 years, I've been happy to find myself on both sides of the used music economy -- selling CDs to make rent, and buying great old records at garage sales. iTunes has never helped me pay the bills, and aside from illegal file sharing, there's no way to put your MP3s back into circulation after you're tired of them.
Music as furniture
I've known people with CD and record collections that take up an entire room of their home. Personally, I love going over to a friend's home and seeing what's on their shelves (books, CDs, DVDs). As our music collections disappear from our shelves and become entombed in our computers and iPods, something gets lost. Sure, it means dinner guests can no longer judge your bad taste in music, but it also means that when you want to hear Nick Drake on a on rainy Sunday afternoon, you'll need to boot up Windows Media Player or scroll through your iPod. Personally, I miss having Nick Drake live on my shelf as a tangible part of my life, and I miss seeing friend's music collections laid bare for me to analyse and admire.
So how about you? What do you miss about how you experienced music 10 years ago? Has today's technology made you feel more or less connected to the bands and musicians behind the music you hear today? Has the shuffle feature on your iPod opened you to new music, or just erased your attention span? I really want to know, so sound off in the comments.
Brian
04/04/2008 12:33 PM
For me it goes both ways. I'm still in the old man camp of buying my music on CDs. My thinking is if I can buy a CD for only 3 or $4 more than getting it as mp3s then I'm getting a better deal. I like having the cover art and something tangible that I've bought, rather than a digital file on my computer that, if my computer blows up and I don't have a back up is gone. I do still own an ipod though and convert my new cds to mp3s (at better quality than itunes offers), but I still want the solid feel of a CD in my hands. The upside of mp3s for me is being able to find music from any band anywhere in the world regardless of whether it's been released here. I have a whole swag of small bands from around the globe that I really like that I've discovered off the web via mp3s, which had we still only had CDs I probably would never have heard.
Report offensive content
Dec540
04/04/2008 12:52 PM
I'm a bit half and half, i love having tangible items etc. but think if we were still back in 1998 i wouldn't be listening to half the bands that i love right now. Yes i share music but i don't see why artists complain, if a friend had not sent me that music then i would never have heard of them, never gone to their concerts. If you think about it in the long run artists are making money out of p2p sharing. They get discovered.. isn't that what every band wants? haha getting a bit off track but just my opinion about the little evolution of music
Report offensive content
Tnie
04/04/2008 01:58 PM
i think itunes is a dud personally. you pay almost as much as you would for most CD's, and the quality is god aweful. are we such a fast pase socity now, none of us appreciate music fidelity quality any more? i dont think anyone should be paying more than 5-10 bucks for a digital album, and there is no reason in that range artists still wont make money. look at NIN 5 bucks for 3 albums worth...thats value, and enough people thought the same to give em over 1.5 mill on one week. if we are set on the gitial path, thats the future, but i must say i cant wait until we get 320kb standard quality, there is a huge loss in fidelity for anything under this
Report offensive content
sexy_shazam
04/04/2008 06:07 PM
well im only 14 but i remember my first ipod i got when i was 11 it was a 4th gen white 20gb ipod and i remember that day i spent uploading every single cd i could find onto my ipod its amazing that 4 yrs on now im on my 3rd ipod (30gb white video) that if theres a song i want all i have to do is open my p2p aplication and get the song for a small or no price altho ever time i pass my local music store i can just smile and think woow people out there are still buying cd's i think we havnt seen the end of the compact disc yet, the cd will prob be round till 2011 - 2015 max the only question now is how long do u think the mp3 will be around for i to agree donald bell in that the mp3 surly cant be the end for music but i think it will prob be around for more or less 10 yrs just like it predessesor the compact disc
Report offensive content
Giorgio
04/04/2008 07:14 PM
I have 3,000 CDs and close to 10,000 LPs and I love listening to full range sound. I occasionally listen to MP3 and invariably, unless it is in the car, feel cheated by the musical quality that chops large chunks of music from the original signal. Try listening to an MP3 encoded Cd on a good system and increase the volume, it is like using razor blades to scratch your brain!
Report offensive content
Dani
05/04/2008 06:16 AM
CD > BETTER > TAPE. CD > BETTER > MP3 (320kbps to 128kbps). DVD-Audio Disk > BETTER > CD. Blue-Ray MD > BETTER > DVD AD. Mini Blue Ray MD > BETTER > DVD AD. Why not move from CD's to DVD's? Can you even compare a 700 Mb's CD to a 4.7 Gb's DVD disk? We could push Audio up yo 12.1 on a single DL-DVD. Wouldn't that better then the old Stereo or the downgraded MP3? Or even better, we could use Blue-Ray Media discs instead of CD's, that would put any mp3 to a shame. We could also use Mini Blue Ray MD which would could do the trick to.
Report offensive content
machine
09/04/2008 02:58 PM
I felt the same way when CD's first arrived. I loved tapes (and records). I loved listening to an album from start to finish. I hated the idea that I could "skip" from one song to the next or "shuffle" the playlist. I wanted to listen to the album the way it was recorded (or the way the artist intended). A lot of albums--for instance, RHCP-BloodSugarSexMagik--were mastered without gaps between the songs. That was awesome! It was like one continuous track. I used to listen to that all the time on cassette. Then I got it on CD and it wasn't the same. Anyway, for me, the whole digital thing started with CD's, so be it CD or mp3, it still sucks not having an analog medium.
Report offensive content
Brennanc
02/05/2008 09:11 PM
I must admit I do miss the days of frantically tapping my TEAC disk player in frustration. There was something about it that just makes me smile now. Maybe it is just because it reminds me of the good old days of my primary school years where everything was still simple =)
Report offensive content
supafran
04/05/2008 06:58 PM
MP3s still squash the dynamic range of a CD to something tiny. REAL artists spend hours in the studio making music that is put to CD then when its squashed and put to MP3 its not how the artist wanted the 'fan' to hear their music. Sure its a good way to put your CD's all on one device but I'd rather listen to music how the artist wanted me to listen to it.
Report offensive content
garth
19/06/2008 01:03 AM
I started with apye black box portable stereo that i carted everywhere all over aus in the 60's with my collection of lps which i stillhave(scratched and warped). i have now copied all of my cds and found mp3s of all the old ones. my collection is about 3500 songs which i burn onto individual cds for personal pleasure or i fit 620 onto a dvd for party times. the mixes are endless. things have changed all for the better
Report offensive content