Netgear RangeMax Next Wireless Router WNR834B

By Alex Kidman on 12 February 2007

Netgear's RangeMax Next Wireless Router edges ever closer to the promise of 802.11n, but it still doesn't quite live up to the hype.

Editor's rating:8.0 User rating:4.9
  • Good: Simple URL-based web configurator • Sleek design lines • Decent throughput •
  • Bad: Internal antennae make it harder to do positional adjustment • Loses WEP at higher speed settings • Doesn't live up to the promises of 802.11n •
  • Specs: 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n • Double Firewall, Denial of Service (DoS) attack prevention, Intrusion Detection and Prevent (IDS), WiFi protected Access (WPA2-PSK, WPA-PSK), Wireless Access Control to identify authorized wireless network devices, MAC address authentication, Exposed Host (DMZ) for secure gaming Privacy & Parental Control, “Trusted user” control, Time-based usage controls, Web site logging, Remote management, URL content filtering • See more specifications
  • RRP: AU$279.00

Design
If there's been a prevailing trend in design of home IT gear in the last few years, it's been for stark white boxes. It seems everyone wants to pick up some of the positive buzz associated with a certain brand of music player, and Netgear's clearly no exception to this rule. The RangeMax Next Wireless Router -- or to give it its more informal and unpronounceable name, the WNR834B -- is a plain white box with optional stand on the base. If you're familiar with routers, the first thing you'll notice is that the antennae appear to be missing, and there's none in the box at all to be attached. Netgear's taken the view that antennae are things that are easily broken or lost, so they've placed them within the WNR834B's enclosure. This has two effects. On the minor league side, the WNR834B is a touch larger than many routers we've tested lately. A more pressing effect, however, is that it's not possible to fiddle with the antennae to improve signal performance, short of twisting the whole case hither and thither.

The WNR834B doesn't have the excellent indicator light setup that we loved so much on the Belkin N1, but it does have another innovation that we'd love to see on more routers. While there's a wizard-based CD setup which is easy enough and standard enough, the WNR834B also offers an easy way to access the router's web setup. Simply entering in "www.routerlogin.net" when attached to the WNR834B takes you straight to the router's web interface. Sure, it's just a mask for the router's default 192.168.2.1 IP address, but it's a heck of lot easier to remember.

Features
The WNR834B is based on the Draft N specification of the 802.11n standard, with a claimed top throughput of 270Mbps when using compatible cards. Unlike the slew of pre-N equipment that manufacturers were selling twelve months ago, Draft N cards and equipment should, in theory, be cross-compatible and essentially give the same performance -- more on that later.

It's also backwards-compatible with 802.11b/g network equipment, although there is a slight catch here. The security setup for the WNR834B is fairly standard, with support offered for WEP, WPA-PSK and WPA2-PSK, but if you're using a network with older 802.11b/g equipment that doesn't support WPA -- such as the Nintendo DS -- you'll have to throttle the WNR834B back from its 270Mbps top speed; WEP is only supported in 802.11b/g mixed mode.

Performance
Testing in our US labs -- you can read their findings here -- showed the WNR834B sitting in the middle of the pack of 802.11n routers available at that time. Netgear representatives told CNET.com.au that newer firmware upgrades have rectified some of the unit's throughput and signal issues, so we were keen to re-test the WNR834B and see how it fared. It also afforded us the opportunity to cross-test Draft N cards with the router; in this case the AU$199 Netgear WN511B and AY$179 Belkin N1 Wireless Notebook card.

Our test results, using CNET.com.au's Broadband Speed test and a simple file copy across the network at distance, showed the kind of results we've seen for many 802.11n equipment. It's undoubtedly a quicker than plain 802.11g equipment in most tests, but not by a hugely appreciable amount, and certainly not in line with the manufacturer claims. Using CNET's Broadband Speed Test as an example, the Netgear WN511B managed an average of 2501kbps -- in fact, across half a dozen tests it maintained that exact score, while the Belkin N1 scores varied more widely but came in for an average of 2510, just slightly ahead of Netgear's own card, but not at a rate worth bothering about. Testing with a vanilla Intel Centrino 802.11g chipset gave us a figure of 2500 -- or in other words, not appreciably worth the fuss for Internet-based comparison.

It was in file transfers that the WNR834B shone -- or, to be more specific, where the WNR834B in combination with Netgear's own WN511B shone. A copy folder of 145MB of files took 3 minutes 23 seconds using the WN511B. Performing the same operation with the Belkin N1 took a much more sedate 9 minutes 56 seconds. Where this has particular relevancy is for wireless media streaming; while the Netgear card and router don't deliver the promised 270Mbps, if they can combine a regular data stream with the kinds of copy speeds we experienced, then streaming video without gaps becomes a distinct possibility.

The WNR834B thus works quite well as a wireless router, and in combination with Netgear's own wireless Draft N card can deliver some good throughput. That's somewhat disappointing in itself -- the real promise for consumers was that the interoperability between cards should have allowed us to pick and choose the best-priced components, not be locked into a particular vendor as was the case with Pre-N products. To its credit, the WNR834B does perform well for file transfers, but it's still yet another case of an 802.11n product that simply doesn't entirely live up to the 802.11n hype.

Topics: draft n, netgear, rangemax, router, wireless, WNR834B, route, test, 802.11n, draft

Comments (15)

  • rwkolo gave 10/10 on 30/11/2008 07:49 Report abuse

    • Good: Getting rid of a lot of wires. Speed is there, Signal strength strong. Firewall on highest setting, it sees my laptop, Linksys Wireless print server. Latest firmware update. McAfee had issues in the beginning, like the instructions say, disable firewalls, windows defender , then install, turn on firewall and defender no problem. :)
      nice web interface
    • Bad: Can not think of any, good product so far.

    I owned a Linksys and went out and purchased this router. I followed the install directions. First time ever using Netgear. No Problems

  • Graft gave 2/10 on 08/11/2008 15:56 Report abuse

    • Good: Looks OK
    • Bad: Encrypted WEP support doesn't seem to work, stopped UPnP working, physical dimensions are quite large to hide aerials.

    Bought a WNR834B and Belkin Wireless N USB stick hoping to use it in a mixed 'G' and 'N' environment with a Dlink DNS323 NAS and DSM-320 Media Server. Spent a day trying to get it to work without success, kept dropping off the Belkin adapter with max speed of 120Mbps and WPA2-PSK when less than 1 metre away. Couldn't get UPnP working even without any encryption or firewalls off, so the DLink NAS and Media server were rendered useless.
    Took it back and got my money back, reverted to my trusty old DLink DI-524UP 802.11G router.
    Interestingly the help file states that if you want to use WEP encryption then expect maximum throughput of 40Mbps, they suggest only using WPA2-PSK, which the DSM-320 didn't support.
    I think I'll look at hard wiring up the house instead!

  • Smith gave 7/10 on 08/08/2008 17:40 Report abuse

    • Good: Fast and efficient.
      Internal antenna is suprisingly powerful.
      Stable uptime
    • Bad: Nothing.

    Great device for both home and office use. Works great on wireless internet. I use it on verizon wireless which is powered by sprint wireless system. I highly preferred this for business men and gamers that this not junky and manage all packets of data very reliability and never loss your precious data.

  • Jake gave 5/10 on 13/04/2008 08:44 Report abuse

    • Good: Easy set-up
      Looks pretty good
    • Bad: Average signal strength with anything other than other "N" devices

    It is quite a good router. It doesn't look all that bad and i have no problems with connection being dropped etc. The product does not increase wireless range unless you have the exact stuff. I swapped my ST 585 for this so i could get a better signal str for my PS3, the signal strength improved by around 3% not really worth it was it?

  • Gordo gave 10/10 on 14/02/2008 06:43 Report abuse

    • Good: Good Coverage and good speed. Easy setup.
    • Bad: None at this time.

    Had no problems with it since I set it up a month ago. Works like a charm especially with MacBooks and their N-cards. Using the default 130Mps with WPA-TKIP security and nobody has reported problems logging in. For those who have problems, make sure you check for firmware updates often.

  • mconnolly gave 2/10 on 04/02/2008 16:24 Report abuse

    • Good: None, simple interface if that matters, but the required functionality is missing.
    • Bad: everything. including absolute garbage tech support and firmware downloads that do not work. Do not buy.

    worst wireless router I have ever used. DO NOT BUY. Mine was working fine for a while after purchase. Applied a firmware update and the router kept dropping afterwards. Contacted Netgear tech, spoke with incompetent tech rep who informed me that he had only been working there 3 weeks and would get back to me, no response afterwards. I have configured cisco and linksys routers in past, this product is severely limited in capabilities and does not perform as listed in product box. DO NOT BUY THIS ROUTER UNLESS U WANT A WORLD OF HEADACHE. I am an windows certified system engineer (windows 2003) and certified DBA. This product is garbage, mine is going in the garbage tomorrow morning and I am going to refert back to my cisco router.

  • Mac01 gave 3/10 on 10/01/2008 17:26 Report abuse

    • Good: Quick support, easy setup (until you get to setup WEP)
    • Bad: Unit does not do what it claims to do

    Despite everything that is on their website, Netgear have decided to quietly remove from the latest firmware any WEP ability. I just purchased this router, tried to hook up my old g adaptor (Netgear) and found that it would only work without security. One side of the router interface told you about WEP yet the selection boxes on the other side were missing. I was incredulous when I went back to online support to be told that the feature is no longer there. I queried again and told them that it was not legal to represent features it did not have, but they kept to the same line. I was incredulous that a company like Netgear could actually contemplate doing this.

  • conwayboys gave 3/10 on 23/12/2007 12:25 Report abuse

    • Good: Nice router looks good no sticking out antenna. Good coverage even the garage loo for my apple laptop.
    • Bad: Cannot set to full power/speed because of a range of incompatibilities with a broad range of different 802.11b & 802.11g products

    Pretty disappointed with this router even though it works perfectly when with a compatible product. Problem is in most homes now there are a variety of wireless products. Me for example I have had to reduce the speed of the router back to 54mbps as many of our products could not cope with the speed or needed WEP to work. When you put this router on full speed it looses the WEP. In our home we have the following, 3 computers 1 hard wired into the router (works perfect) one with standard wireless card 8 feet away from the router through a plaster wall (50% signal 34mbps) one with netgear wireless card 15 feet from router (54mbps full strength) 1 PS3 downstairs signal good but only on reduced speed will not work at high speed, one Nintedo Wii will not work at high speed,works ok at 54mbps, Nintendo DS will not work without WEP. IPOD Touch will not work at high speed.

  • gireddy gave 3/10 on 15/11/2007 08:35 Report abuse

    • Good: easy to install.
    • Bad: All.

    Dies at least once in two days. If I configure with TKIP & AES my XP comuter fails to connect. Works with VPN, but the other computers dies.

  • Mary And George gave 10/10 on 01/11/2007 16:45 Report abuse

    • Good: Easy setup for a Wireless N product, very sleak design, nice interface
    • Bad: instructions are lacking on some setup for how to going a wireless-g card to the wireless-n router.

    We purchased the equivalent in Linksys and then returned it because we could not get it to work. The netgear worked like a charm with less stress. We have never had an issue with connectivity (when using proper equipment!). This is one of the nicer products I have seen

Post your own

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 & A..F

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

The Explain Series

Where to buy Netgear RangeMax Next Wireless Router WNR834B

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder

Recently viewed products