Nikon Coolpix L10

By Will Greenwald on 12 October 2007

The Nikon Coolpix L10 makes a great budget point-and-shoot camera, if you don't mind its paltry 5-megapixel resolution.

Editor's rating:6.4 User rating:8.7
  • Good: Decent picture quality • Decent performance
  • Bad: Very few controls • Very slow flash recycle time • Relatively low resolution • Slow shutter in low light
  • Specs: Digital compact • 5 megapixels • 2 inch • 3 x • See more specifications
  • RRP: AU$149.00

You don't need a high-resolution camera to get good-looking pictures. If they're made right, 5-megapixel cameras can produce great photos. If you're on a tight budget, but still want to take some photos, consider the Nikon Coolpix L10. This little camera has few features, a very slow flash recycle time, and can only produce up to 5-megapixel stills, but its tiny price tag and decent picture quality make it a solid budget contender.

Design
As Nikon's lowest-end budget camera, the L10 is hardly built to impress. Its unassuming, blocky plastic body measures just an 60mm thick and weighs about 167 grams with an SD card and two AA batteries, making it compact enough for most jacket and shirt pockets. The camera sports a relatively low-resolution 5-megapixel sensor, a narrow 37.5-112.5mm equivalent, f/2.8-5.2 3X optical zoom lens, and a downright puny 2-inch LCD screen.

Despite its unimpressive hardware, the camera still has the same handy features Nikon includes on all of its Coolpix cameras. Face-Priority AF finds faces in portraits and family photos, adjusting focus accordingly. In-Camera Red-Eye Fix corrects red-eye when processing photos. D-Lighting senses when subjects are backlit or dark, and changes exposure settings to correct those problems after the picture is taken. This typically results in a photo with a narrower dynamic range, but it can also mean the difference between a usable picture and no picture at all.

Features
Like every Coolpix L-series and almost every other budget camera out there, the L10 offers very few user controls. Besides white balance, exposure compensation, and a standard selection of scene presets, you can't change many of the camera's settings. Most notably, the aforementioned exposure compensation is the only control you have over a photo's exposure. This means very little flexibility when shooting, but that's not necessarily a bad thing; if the snapshot camera shoots well on its own, it doesn't need many manual settings.

Performance and Image quality
Fortunately, the L10 indeed takes good pictures. You can't blow them up or make prints nearly as large as shots taken from 8- or 10-megapixel cameras, but the L10's 5-megapixel pictures are still more than acceptable for letter-size prints, e-mail, and Web sites. The camera reproduces colours faithfully, and its automatic white balance appeared neutral even when shooting under our warm tungsten lights.

While its automated ISO sensitivity prevented us from performing our full set of noise tests, you should expect a fair amount of noise when the camera decides to up the ISO. Thankfully, Nikon does a decent job of keeping that noise under control, so that it shouldn't take away from prints until you get up to the camera's highest couple of sensitivity settings. However, if you don't mind shooting with flash when necessary, the camera probably won't have to push the ISO too high and you should get decent prints a good portion of the time.

Though certainly not fast in our tests, the L10 wasn't too bad for a rock-bottom budget camera. After a two-second wait from power-on to capturing its first shot, we could take a new photo every 2.2 seconds with the flash turned off. With the onboard flash enabled, that time more than doubled to a very disappointing 4.5 seconds. While its shutter only lagged 0.7 seconds with our high-contrast target, our low-contrast target made it pause for an arduous 2.2 seconds. Burst mode worked well, capturing 14 5-megapixel stills in seven seconds for a satisfying 2fps.

Shooting speed (seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Typical shot-to-shot time  
Time to first shot  
Shutter lag (typical)  
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W35
1.7 
1.4 
0.4 
Nikon Coolpix L10
2.2 
2.0 
0.6 
Nikon Coolpix L11
2.2 
1.8 
0.7 
Olympus FE-230
2.4 
2.5 
0.9 
Nikon Coolpix L12
2.4 
2.5 
0.7 

Typical continuous-shooting speed (frames per second)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Olympus FE-230
N/A
Nikon Coolpix L10
2.0 

For such an unassuming little camera, the Nikon Coolpix L10 actually works pretty well. It's responsive enough for casual shooting, and its (admittedly small) 5-megapixel photos look great. If you're looking for a simple, functional camera for less than AU$200, this makes a great choice. If you're willing to spend a bit more for slightly higher resolution photos, the L10's bigger brothers, the Coolpix L11 and L12, offer 6- and 7-megapixel stills for AU$279 and AU$349 respectively.

Topics: nikon, coolpix, l10, budget, digital camera, camera, 5-megapixel, photo, shot, shoot

Comments (3)

  • EdT gave 6/10 on 25/06/2009 21:29 Report abuse

    • Good: Price, usability, size and quality, also shutter speed.
    • Bad: Chews through battries and gets stuck sometimes. Also there could be a few more options and accessability is poor.

    The L10 is a good camera but i have had some problems with the camera after about a year. It has frozen about several times,even after i sent it back to the manufacturer to be fixed (under warrenty) and it came back good as new till about a couple of months later.
    Apart from that it is a pretty good camera and I'm pleased with it myself.

  • awdav gave 10/10 on 29/12/2007 23:21 Report abuse

    • Good: Price, Size, Weight, Speed, Functions, Quality of Photos
    • Bad: Delete feature is too well hidden for Delete All, easy to scratch the casing.

    Bought one today for $98 new. Replaced a Kodak 2.0MP C series. Really nice camera for the price and for a snapper of family photos only, this little gem is a god send.

    I can;t believe the speed in it's readiness to take the next photo and with the flash on its still not too bad.

    Compared to it's rivals, Nikon have done a good job with this little camera...very impressed

  • Andy Carnahan gave 10/10 on 06/10/2007 07:41 Report abuse

    • Good: Price, functionality, picture quality
    • Bad: flash washes out close up, close up focussing, connection software

    The high rating is based on my needs - a good digital camera for snaps. It is perfect for that

    For a simple basic camera the L10 is excellent. 5MP is plenty for good photos. The battery life is good. I replaced a 7 year 1.3 MP Sony Cybershot U that cost $500 and a 4 year old $1,000 5 MP Sony. The Cybershot U was a great size, the 5MP Sony was a disappointment for the price.

    The L10 shows how far Digitals have come - I paid around $150 and have been really happy with the result. I carry the camera with me, and because of the low price don't have to be too precious about it.

    I don't like the connection software - both Sonys connected as USB devices, the Nikon uses the Windows Picture "Wizard".

Post your own

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 & A..F

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

The Explain Series

Where to buy Nikon Coolpix L10

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder

Recently viewed products