Nikon Coolpix S220

We never thought that we'd describe a camera as cute, but we were wrong — the S220 is quite possibly the cutest little compact you can buy, with striking good looks for a relatively low asking price. It's letdown by the lens quality though, which detracts from the overall prettiness of the package.


7.2
CNET Rating
5.1
User Rating

About The Author

CNET Editor

Lexy spent her formative years taking a lot of photos and dreaming in technicolour. Nothing much has changed now she's covering all things photography related for CNET. You can find her hosting the weekly Pulse podcast.


Design

While it may be the lowest entry into Nikon's compact range for 2009, the S220 certainly doesn't look it. Unlike low-end cameras from other brands (we're thinking of the Canon PowerShot A480 here), the S220 exudes a particular sophistication that is from either great design work or a complete denial of its asking price and specifications.

The S220 from the back. We promise it looks sexier than this in real life. (Credit: Nikon)

Our review unit was silver, though the camera does come in a strange looking queasy green, magenta, blue and purple. To give you an idea of just how small it is, grab your nearest business card. It's just a smidgen smaller on either side, and weighs 100g without a battery and memory card. Svelte is the keyword here, with the lens unit hardly protruding at all when folded back into the body, plus the smooth buttons at the back just nudging out of the surface. The layout is nothing new from what is standard on other Nikon cameras, with most controls being fairly easy to understand on first glance.

Features

There's nothing too out of the ordinary on the S220, a standard 10-megapixel sensor, image stabilisation (though it is electronic, not mechanical), and a 3x optical zoom. There's a 2.5-inch LCD screen as well, though it won't be winning many fans over with its relatively low resolution. It uses SD cards and a rechargeable, slim Li-ion battery which Nikon quotes as being able to take 180 shots on a full charge.

The camera is able to achieve a maximum ISO of 2000, though as is usual, we don't see why on a compact with such a tiny sensor. The S220 also has a staggering amount of scene modes — 16 at last count.

Performance and image quality

The S220 took just under two seconds to start and in general use was quite speedy in terms of shutter lag and shot-to-shot time. In continuous mode the camera managed around 1.5 shots per second.

As for the colours, they're rather punchy and vivid indeed, more over-saturated than is perhaps necessary. At full magnification pictures were decidedly soft, except around areas that were selected to be in focus. The sensor also lost an amount of detail in shadowed areas. Noise over ISO 800 was definitely prominent and you would struggle to get a printable shot at anything over a standard 4x6 here.

Lens quality obviously wasn't high up on Nikon's priority list when they were designing this camera, as it exhibited a fair amount of distortion at both ends of the zoom spectrum, and several other optical issues in usage. There's an in-built distortion control setting, which you can see in action below, but we would have much preferred to see higher quality glass rather than in-camera settings to reduce it.

With distortion control off (left) and on (right), you can see the camera struggles with barrel distortion without the in-camera setting. (Credit: CBSi)

One major gripe we had was with the rather lacklustre screen, which exhibited light flaring and at times struggled to keep up with the action as its refresh rate was relatively low. On a camera of this price, even though it is technically the bottom of the Coolpix range, we would have appreciated a slightly higher resolution screen.

Conclusion

The sub-AU$300 compact camera space is filled with the 3x zoom, 10-megapixel crowd. All the specifications start to look the same, so every camera in this price point needs something unique to set it apart — in the case of the S220 it's the incredibly small size and good looks. Unfortunately, the images it produces aren't without problems as we've mentioned above, so take this into consideration before handing over your cash.

Previous Story

Canon IXUS 95 IS

Digital Cameras
Next Story

Canon PowerShot A2000 IS


Add Your Review 25


* Below fields optional


Post comment as
 

Stutty posted a comment   

used camera only a few times,picture is snowy now,camera is not working properly,its only one year old,i am sending it back to nikon for repair or exchange for a better model.Stutty,

grg
10
Rating
 

grg posted a review   

The Good:size

The Bad:poor picture quality

i would never buy nokion camera.due poor quality

 

Ahtsham posted a comment   

The Good:Light Weight, Quick, easy to use,

The Bad:Picture Quality

i thought its nikon so i must be good, but Nikon, i will never every buy anything from you. this is just waste of money.

iv man
9
Rating
 

iv man posted a review   

The Good:small and awesome! love it

The Bad:nothing its wicked

I bought it for 150,and im enjoing my money.:{)

 

kra posted a comment   

The Good:small and cute

The Bad:picture quality

i have all the same problems and i just thought it was me not knowing to use it haha, but i wanna know what camera is the best for picture quality and not having all my pictures come out grainy looking

Madilou
1
Rating
 

Madilou posted a review   

The Good:Nice looking camera

The Bad:Pretty much everything

I can't believe camera shops are allowed to sell these cameras. The colour quality and picture quality is so unbelievably bad. I'm just going to keep using my Sony Cybershot. What a piece of junk!

 

Kiru posted a comment   

The Good:Lightweight

The Bad:Noisy and incredibly saturated pictures, bad focus

I just bought this camera today, and I'm going back to return it. The pictures are horrible! They're incredibly noisy, and with ISO adjustments they become blurry and way too saturated. It doesn't focus well on an object, either. It's incredibly blurry.

put2
3
Rating
 

put2 posted a review   

The Good:nice design

The Bad:very bad quality pic and lcd

no more buying nikon, canon is the best

qazqaz
1
Rating
 

qazqaz posted a review   

The Good:Look, size

The Bad:VERY VERY BAD pics

I can't get it back! I will never buy anything with label NIKON in my life again! :( Damn NIKON! Shame!

 

dreamchasr posted a comment   

The Good:Price and size

The Bad:Less than desirable picture quality.

I bought two of these as starter cameras for my kids. At $100.00 (including carry case and memory card) it is a great deal for a starter camera. Easy to use and stylish.


Sponsored Links

User Reviews / Comments  Nikon Coolpix S220

  • Stutty

    Stutty

    "used camera only a few times,picture is snowy now,camera is not working properly,its only one year old,i am sending it back to nikon for repair or exchange for a better model.Stutty,"

  • grg

    grg

    Rating10

    "i would never buy nokion camera.due poor quality"

  • Ahtsham

    Ahtsham

    "i thought its nikon so i must be good, but Nikon, i will never every buy anything from you. this is just waste of money."

Recently Viewed Products