Norton AntiVirus 2009

By Robert Vamosi on 15 October 2008

Norton AntiVirus 2009 hits all the right security notes, and its superior protection technologies might even win back some jaded anti-Symantec folks, though for some, technical support may continue to frustrate.

8.0 6.9
  • Good: Leaner footprint • Improved speed • Whitelisting • Free technical support
  • Bad: Lacks adequate online technical support • Drives users to its paid technical support services
  • RRP: AU$49.99

Symantec has been listening to its users, and this year the company delivers a slimmed-down and faster Norton AntiVirus 2009. Almost all the security vendors have recognised the changing threat landscape and have rethought traditional protection. We especially like the Insight feature, which identifies "trusted" files and applications and doesn't waste time rescanning them unless there's been a change. No other product does this. The redesigned logic behind Norton AntiVirus 2009 clearly shows in CNET performance testing: it is faster and considerably lighter than last year's version. Norton continues to win awards in third-party effectiveness testing. Lagging behind, though, is Symantec's technical support. While Norton users now have free telephone support, Symantec still doesn't provide enough of a knowledge base, or even an adequate user's manual. Once again, this year it emphasises its premium services a bit too much. That said, Norton AntiVirus 2009 presents a remarkable transformation of a product and is worth a second look.

Installation
On our test system, we downloaded Norton AntiVirus 2009 and installed the product within a minute. Instead of relying upon Microsoft's installer, which Symantec has blamed for much of its past product bloat, the company started over, designing its own installer. There is the added advantage that as criminals target MSI files (say to prevent you from installing a security defence product on your already compromised machine) Symantec won't be affected — for now. The new installer process works fast, borrowing streaming technology from its Norton Ghost product. On both Windows Vista and Windows XP test machines, we were up and running in one minute and without a reboot.

Should you want to uninstall, Norton includes an uninstall option. In the past, Norton left a mess. Now, after rebooting our machine, what is left behind is licensing information.

Interface
Speaking of a mess, we didn't like last year's Halloween colours on the user interface. This year's redesign is much cleaner and more sophisticated, one befitting a major security product, and the colours used on the Interface can be changed if you want. Also gone are the tabs reminding you that you can purchase other Norton products. Specific tools can be turned on and off easily without diving into the configuration settings. The configuration settings page itself is always one click below the main page. The interface also offers a pop-up dialogue to explain specific terms, although thorough explanations of the choice users have in changing the settings is still lacking.

In the lower left-hand panel are two bar graphs representing the overall Windows resources used and one for the specific resources used by the Norton product. Compared with the resources used reported within the Task Manager in Windows, we noticed a slight sync problem between what Windows reported and what Norton reported for the overall system. Symantec confirmed that while Norton AntiVirus 2009 is looking at the Windows Task Manager, it is doing so at different intervals. We like the transparency, and think the presentation here is better than the line graphs used in some other security applications. Should you want line graphs, an icon will reveal how the system and Norton CPU usage has been since the system was last rebooted.

Features
Norton has, in the past, included some sophisticated technology from its enterprise products, which is good because it's cutting-edge, but it's also bad, because it doesn't necessarily integrate with the product, nor is it necessary. In Norton AntiVirus 2009, they seem to have found the right balance.

Whitelisting, the buzzword of security products for 2009, is included, and by marrying it with other technologies, Symantec makes it more suited for the user. Files on a whitelist are deemed trusted, and thus do not need to be scanned as often. Not all "safe files" make it onto the whitelist. For those, Norton uses a community process, called Insight, similar to that used by other security products such as Haute Secure. The thinking is that if thousands of other people are using this suspicious file, chances are it's not a new piece of malicious software but a new application. On the other hand, if only a few are using it, then maybe it's worth it to take another look to see if it's malicious software.

Malicious software signature updates are provided much faster, in some cases within five minutes of the last update.

Gone is the awful LiveUpdate component of past Norton products. With 2009 products, Symantec is providing anti-malware definition signatures every few minutes or so. On the interface, you'll see a notice indicating how many minutes since the last update. We didn't see definitions older than four minutes in our testing.

Missing still are the various security utilities provided in other products, namely McAfee VirusScan. We would like to see, for instance, a secure file eraser or the capability to trace potentially malicious IP addresses within Norton AntiVirus 2009. Nor is there any mobile-specific security solution provided within Norton AntiVirus 2009.

Topics: virus protection, symantec, norton, antivirus, 2009, antiviru, product

Comments (11)

  • Rakesh gave a review on 24/06/2009 20:26 Report abuse

    Great Product, Norton has lifted its game and produced a wonderful AV. It has significantly changed my opinion about Norton

    Well Done Very happy

    • Good: Much better installation than previous vesions, very quick as well and no reboot for a change. Its GUI is pleasing and looks good too.
    • Bad: It sometimes is very unresponsive, i havent heard this issue anywhere (windows 7 64 bit build 7100)
  • DarrylC gave 9/10 on 06/05/2009 22:24 Report abuse

    People who complain about how system intensive NIS is haven't given 09 a shot. Much better than previous versions.

    Works great. No issues since upgrade to 09. With 08 I had issues with Vundo.

    I haven't had a complaint about tech support. Had to use online help once with updater not working. Yeah I had to wait a while, but once there the tech took over my pc remotely and fixed it up. Didn't cost me anything. What more could I want?

    I have found it is cheaper to go to Harvey Norman and buy a whole new package every year rather than extend subscription. It is cheaper this way.

    • Good: Simple, effective, lightweight
    • Bad: cheaper to buy whole new product rather than renew subscription annually.
  • Simo gave a review on 19/04/2009 18:12 Report abuse

    Somehow this virus installed itself on my computer and no matter how many times I delete/uninstall, it keeps popping up trying to run scans and asking for my credit card details.

    • Good: its a virus in itself
    • Bad: above
  • Rahul chole gave 7/10 on 29/03/2009 03:35 Report abuse

    No

    • Good: No
    • Bad: No
  • elbow grease gave 6/10 on 08/01/2009 14:52 Report abuse

    I bumped up ram to 1.2 meg and Norton still bogged down my pc. Can't afford to make that mistake again.

    • Good: Very effective
    • Bad: Norton scans took precidence over all other pc functions. not good.
  • griff gave 9/10 on 03/01/2009 11:10 Report abuse

    I use XP and had a perfect installation. It is unobtrusive and it had low CPU usage when I last checked. I was previously using McAfee, and I was always having trouble, components uninstalling and then they charged my credit card without permission for another year subscription. That's why I switched.

    After installing Norton's, it found a malicious file that escaped McAfee's attention and a harmful tracking cookie that McAfee never warned me of.

    I'm very happy.

    • Good: Easy installation
      Unobtrusive
      Has not slowed my PC
    • Bad: Have not found one yet.
  • luu tran van gave 8/10 on 27/12/2008 23:25 Report abuse

    antivirus w32.trijontra,ijjhkjhkjhgfdfdss

    • Good: antivirus
    • Bad: antivirus
  • tangra gave 10/10 on 23/10/2008 10:54 Report abuse

    Works like a charm. Haven't done any tests on how it will react to different attacks, but looking forward it. A BIG CHANGE from the old versions.

    • Good: Light, load time is quite good and updates are not heavy.
    • Bad: too early to say
  • PBO gave 9/10 on 18/10/2008 02:12 Report abuse

    Works fine, also with XP, sp3. Small footprint, clear userinterface

  • The Geek gave 1/10 on 15/10/2008 23:04 Report abuse

    After the continuing problems I've had with N360 I will never buy a Symantec product again.

    • Good: None.
    • Bad: The Tech support based in India is a joke.

Post your own

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

Where to buy Norton AntiVirus 2009

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder