Olympus FE-210

By Will Greenwald on 19 March 2007

With poor indoor white balance, soft images, and sluggish performance, it's best to give this camera a pass.

Editor's rating:5.4 User rating:6.5
  • Good: Extremely simple to use
  • Bad: Shoddy incandescent white balance and complete automation mean severely yellow indoor photos • Soft images • Sluggish performance
  • Specs: Digital compact • 7.1 megapixels • 2.5 inch • 3 x • See more specifications
  • RRP: AU$199.00

Sometimes you just don't want to agonise over whether you should choose the soup or the salad, the Coke or the Pepsi, the PC or the Mac. Olympus realises just how hard choices can be, which is why it makes the FE series of digital cameras. They're simple, direct, and require almost no choices, besides when to press the shutter button. The 7-megapixel FE-210 is one such camera.

Design
The FE-210's small, chunky plastic body measures 30.5mm thick and weighs about 170 grams with battery and memory card, making it the largest member of the FE camera series. Despite the comparable bulk, the FE-210 still fits easily into most pockets, and is light enough to carry around without effort. The extra heft also gives the camera enough room to hold its two AA batteries. While the camera doesn't come with rechargeable batteries, AA batteries are cheaper and easier to swap and replace than the rechargeable lithium ion batteries the other FE cameras use.

Features
Within the FE-210's cookie-cutter plastic shell is a fairly standard digital camera. Besides its 7-megapixel sensor, it has a typical 38mm to 114mm-equivalent lens, a 2.5-inch LCD with no viewfinder, and a small handful of scene presets. These are all typical digital camera features, with little if anything to set the FE-210 apart from other models.

Like all Olympus FE series cameras, the FE-210 almost completely lacks manual settings. Besides flash and macro shooting, preset scene modes, and exposure compensation, users can't adjust their shots at all. The camera automates nearly all settings, including white balance and ISO sensitivity, giving a very literal sense to the phrase "point and shoot." This isn't necessarily a bad thing; automation can be beneficial as long as the images look good in the end.

Unfortunately for Olympus, the images from the FE-210 don't look very good. Under incandescent lighting, images appeared very warm and yellowed. This wouldn't be a big problem in a camera with selectable white balances, but the FE-210's automation means that nearly all of your indoor shots will look yellow. Fine details appeared soft in our test shots, with text appearing fuzzy and barely readable. We also saw notable lens distortion at both the wide and telephoto ends of the zoom, causing prominent barreling and pincushioning in our test shots.

Performance
The FE-210 performed sluggishly in our tests, though it was still quite usable. After a 4.2-second start time, we could snap off a new shot every 2.7 seconds. With the onboard flash enabled, that wait increased to 4.1 seconds. The shutter lagged only 0.6 seconds with our high-contrast target, but that time more than tripled to 1.9 seconds with our low-contrast target. Like almost every other FE series camera, the FE-210 didn't have any burst mode to test.

The Olympus FE-210 is a compact, inexpensive little camera that tries to be foolproof. Unfortunately, its completely automated modes, disappointing white balance, and mediocre image quality mean all of your non-flash indoor shots will come out soft, blotchy, and yellow. Add to that some disappointing performance numbers and a wholly unimpressive feature set, and you get a very-cheap-seeming digital camera. To Olympus's credit, the FE-240 fared slightly better in our tests, so if you're willing to spend a little extra cash, but like the FE design, it might be a better choice.

Topics: olympus, fe-210, compact, digital camera, camera, shot, battery, seconds, test, yellow

Comments (11)

  • Ametiel gave 5/10 on 06/01/2009 20:26 Report abuse

    • Good: Easy to use, fast, fairly compact and the software with it is straightforward.
    • Bad: poor quality, eats batteries like theres no tommorow, flash is too sharp... Definetely a camera for a begginer.

    Simplistic to use, but very very un-customisable.. Takes a lot to get a decent photo out of it. I would reccomend it for people who want something quick and easy to use, but dont plan to get stunning photos from it.

  • ehyeoh gave 3/10 on 24/11/2008 18:28 Report abuse

    • Bad: It does not work with rechargeable battery. The low battery warning appears after you take one or two pictures.

    This is my second digital camera because of the price and can be used with standard batteries. After a year using, the exposure feature seem not working properly. All pictures taken come out with bright and white color. I need to find the service centre for repair now.

  • varman gave 2/10 on 27/12/2007 21:02 Report abuse

    • Good: Cheap....
    • Bad: False Low battery warning problems!
      Terrible night or low light shots

    Worst Camera

  • megstar73 gave 3/10 on 27/11/2007 18:23 Report abuse

    • Good: stylish, simple, 10/10 picture quality
    • Bad: mechanicle problems

    awesome picture quality until it failed it turn on and hasnt worked since. plus it has been sent away and stil fails to work

  • eac gave 9/10 on 04/10/2007 12:49 Report abuse

    • Good: very easy to use, takes great photes unlike my sisters nikon which the photos always look very unflattering at some times.
    • Bad: can take photos a bit slowly, or uncertain when the photo has actually been taken or not.

    great as a 1st digital camera!!

  • The Met gave 7/10 on 19/09/2007 22:24 Report abuse

    • Good: When it takes a good shot, its a very good shot.
    • Bad: Colour tones I have noticed are a little off hue. If it takes anything else apart from a 'good' shot, it's pretty average. Certain graininess using Anti-shake mode.

    Decent camera to use, for it's price. Simple to use.

  • loveisxx gave 9/10 on 19/09/2007 17:37 Report abuse

    • Good: great
    • Bad: none i can think of

    great i luv it i used to have fe 240 and it is worse then this

  • bethenayWHOAA gave 9/10 on 17/08/2007 18:44 Report abuse

    • Good: Cheap, easy to use, light, great battery life, stylish. GREAT editing program.
      clear photos.
    • Bad: poor indoor photos.

    This is my second digital camera, but the first one i had was no-where near as good but was 3 times the price!

  • faith gave 8/10 on 01/08/2007 19:18 Report abuse

    • Good: Easy to use. Big buttons that are colour coded. On camera instruction screen. Easy to access batteries - easy to replace batteries...
    • Bad: Beware the wheel menu - a bump can move the setting.

    First digital camera of my own. Borrowed others and no where easy to use as this one. Feels comfortable, lightweight and for the "I.T." newby, it is brilliant. Instills confidence.

  • ninjabanana gave 6/10 on 25/06/2007 19:05 Report abuse

    • Good: the quality of the photos are good, extremely easy to use, big viewing screen
    • Bad: slightly chunky - only a bit , AA batteries - not rechargable ones, short battery life - mine was low batt after a day and a half of moderate use, software lags a bit.

    it's a good ideal first camera, for $198 it's very cheap for a 7.1 mega pixel digi cam .

Post your own

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 & A..F

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

The Explain Series

Where to buy Olympus FE-210

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder

Recently viewed products