Olympus FE-240

By Will Greenwald on 06 March 2007

The Olympus FE-240 is slow and doesn't have any manual settings, but at least it takes good pictures.

6.6 4.3
  • Good: Decent pictures • Small and light
  • Bad: Very slow performance • No manual settings
  • Specs: Digital compact • 7.1 megapixels • 2.5 inch • 5 x • See more specifications
  • RRP: AU$399.00

Sometimes you just don't want to agonise over whether you should choose the soup or the salad; the Coke or the Pepsi; the PC or the Mac. Olympus realises just how hard some choices can be, which is why it's made the FE series of digital cameras. They're simple and direct, and they require almost no choices besides when to press the shutter. The Olympus FE-240 is one such camera.

Design
The attractive, compact FE-240 measures 23.4mm thick and weighs just 115 grams. Its small metal body fits comfortably in most pockets. Despite its small size, the camera's various controls are easy to manipulate, with buttons large enough for big thumbs to use.

Features
The FE-240's most notable feature is its lens. The camera's 38mm-to-190mm-equivalent lens offers a 5x magnification factor over the other FE-cameras' 3x lenses. Besides the increased zoom, the FE-240 sports fairly mundane features, such as a 7-megapixel sensor and a 2.5-inch LCD screen.

Like all Olympus FE-series cameras, the FE-240 is almost completely devoid of manual settings. Besides flash and macro shooting, preset scene modes, and exposure compensation, users can't make any image adjustments. White balance, ISO sensitivity, and other factors are completely automated by the camera, giving a very literal sense to the phrase "point-and-shoot." This isn't necessarily a bad thing; automation can be beneficial as long as the images look good in the end.

Performance
The FE-240's performance ranged from mediocre to terrible. After a 2.6-second startup time, we could only fire off a shot every 5.1 seconds; that painful wait increased to 5.7 seconds with the onboard flash enabled. While 5 seconds is indeed far too long to wait between shots, it's not too surprising; the previous-generation FE-200 had shot-to-shot times of more than 7 seconds. The shutter wasn't nearly as responsive as it should have been, lagging 0.8 second on our high-contrast target and 1.9 seconds in low-contrast conditions. Like almost all Olympus FE-series cameras, the FE-240 doesn't have any burst mode.

Shooting time
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Typical shot-to-shot time  
Time to first shot  
Shutter lag (typical)  
Canon Digital IXUS 60
1.5 
1.5 
0.5 
Kodak EasyShare V705
1.2 
3.6 
0.3 
Olympus Mju 760
2.1 
2.1 
0.5 
Olympus FE-240
5.1 
2.6 
0.8 
Olympus FE-200
7.3 
4 
1 

Image quality
Though its performance was disappointing, the FE-240's images were actually quite nice. Colours were accurate and neutral -- even indoors, a tricky thing to accomplish with a camera's automatic white balance. Fine details came through clearly, and we saw very little lens distortion. Because of its fully automated operation, we couldn't perform our full regimen of noise tests, but given adequate lighting, photos had very little grain or fuzz. Just be careful when shooting in low light; the camera automatically ramps up the ISO sensitivity, generating lots of noise.

Despite the Olympus FE-240's sluggish performance and almost complete lack of manual settings, it's still a pretty good camera for new users. If you simply want to take decent photos and don't want to fiddle around with a lot of menus and buttons, it's a acceptable choice. Its price may seem a bit high for such a simple camera, but its photos look good, it's easy to use, and it's small enough to take almost anywhere.

Topics: digital camera, fe-240, olympus, snapshot, camera, shot, seconds, lens

Comments (7)

  • bjlclarke gave 4/10 on 30/12/2008 12:04 Report abuse

    Attractive looks. Unattractive overall performance.

    • Good: Light, easy menu, good quality photos in good light.
    • Bad: Shutter speed FAR FAR to slow, Zoomed photos in poor light with flash to dark.
  • chris gave 1/10 on 12/11/2008 22:11 Report abuse

    I have been most dissappointed.

    • Good: small
    • Bad: FAR TOO SLOW. photos grainy, or blurry,,,
  • chris gave 3/10 on 17/06/2008 10:10 Report abuse

    I was mislead when purchasing this camera, after specifying that I the fully manual mode that my previous Canon had was one thing I wanted, I was still pointed to this camera. I was tempted to take it back, but thought I'd give it a go anyway.

    However, while it's nice and slim and has a great screen, and takes decent photos in some situations, in others it sucks.

    One big selling point was the 5x optical zoom in a slim camera, all other similarly slim cameras were only 3x zoom. However, what I found when looking through the last set of photos I took was that at maximum optical zoom setting, the photo quality is terrible.

    So while the photo is beautiful and clear when zoomed right out, it's definitely distorted when zoomed in on the 5x optical zoom. Hence the big selling point is no longer a good selling point.

    I definitely want to go back to Canon, they take much better photos. I'll probably go for a bigger more featured camera and just get a mobile phone with a nice camera for taking simple point and shoot photos with a pocket sized camera.

    • Good: Small and light
      Great screen
      Good looking camera
    • Bad: No manual settings
      Zooming in results in distorted images
  • kay-en gave 5/10 on 17/03/2008 21:19 Report abuse

    Its an ok.

    • Good: takes good photos
    • Bad: far too slow
  • claz gave 10/10 on 19/12/2007 16:45 Report abuse

    Great I loved it

    • Good: Small and good pictures
    • Bad: To slow
  • ceebee gave 2/10 on 24/06/2007 21:42 Report abuse

    Far inferior to my old bulkier Kodak. A very disappointing camera... useless for my humble purposes of taking pics of family, children, pets, holidays; & also photographing items for selling on eBay, where I need ACCURATE colour reproduction & clarity.

    • Good: Small and compact.
    • Bad: Extremely slow shutter speed means taking photos of children, animals, anything moving, is near impossible - unless you like a pic of an ear or the back of a head or just a blur!
      The colour reproduction is abysmal - I CANNOT get true colour no matter what the lighting conditions; and the colour lacks vibrancy and depth.
      Hard to get a sharp picture - probably because of the long time lag between pressing the shutter and the picture being taken.
  • safeer gave 5/10 on 13/06/2007 15:41 Report abuse

    1.it's sensitive to small shake
    2.video software is not coming along with camera
    3. compell to format memory after copying to computer

Post your own

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

Where to buy Olympus FE-240

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder