Olympus Mju Tough 6000

By Alexandra Savvides on 14 April 2009

For the most part, the Tough 6000 is fairly lacklustre, even if it looks stylish and can take a decent picture when it wants to. We like it better than the Tough 8000 and would recommend it over the more expensive camera, if you can live with its slow speeds and quirks.

Editor's rating:7.3 User rating:5.5
  • Good: Compact design • Relatively stylish for a rugged camera • Very bright LCD screen (both a help and a hindrance though) • Wide-angle lens
  • Bad: Image quality not fantastic • Still a little expensive for what you get • Very bright flash • Slow
  • Specs: Digital compact • 10 megapixels • 2.7 inch • 3.6 x • See more specifications
  • RRP: AU$499.00

Olympus has gone through a bit of a re-branding of late — its new series of rugged cameras, which used to be known as the SW series, are now called Tough. There are two new cameras that the company announced back in January — the Tough 8000 and Tough 6000. Both are waterproof, shockproof and feature a host of controls designed to make their use in the snow easier. The 6000 is AU$100 cheaper over its bigger sibling, so why pay more?

Design

This camera certainly looks nicer than the Tough 8000 for the most part — it's thinner, more compact, and is slightly easier to hold in one hand. The lollipop-esque exterior is a little off-putting, though we can see how this will easily appeal to those who like brash, garish colours more so than the understated chrome appeal of the other camera. For the most part we applaud Olympus for pushing the design boundaries a little bit.

Button layout doesn't deviate from the standard Olympus configuration, so as you spin this camera around to the back you'll notice that it has the small silver buttons that we're used to seeing and a mode dial that rotates 360 degrees.

Smooth metals at the front and the back lend a somewhat refined feel despite the garish colour selection, and the entire unit is relatively lightweight for a tough camera at 149g. It's definitely lighter than one of its competitors, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT1, which weighs in at 162.5g.

Features

In terms of functionality, the Tough 6000 is fairly similar to the other waterproof, shockproof companions on the market such as the aforementioned Panasonic and the Canon PowerShot D10. Inside you'll get 10 megapixels rather than the 12 afforded to its older sibling the 8000, the camera is shockproof to 1.5 metres and waterproof to 3 metres, as well as snowproof to -10 degrees Celsius.

The Tough 6000 certainly looks like it can cut the mustard. (Credit: Olympus)

These specifications are the real Olympus stronghold in the compact camera market — more than likely you'll be drawn to one of these Tough cameras because you require something rugged that will withstand the elements. Image quality and performance, as we've discovered with previous iterations of the Tough series, still has some way to go — see below to find out if the Tough 6000 is able to buck this trend or not.

As well as the requisite ruggedness, you will also find dual-image stabilisation and a ridiculously bright 2.7-inch LCD screen which is great for the snow and outdoors, but not so useful for remaining incognito on your spy training course. The lens is a splendid 28mm wide, which is ideal for sweeping panoramic vistas, but the zoom is capped at a maximum of 3.6x optical. Storage is the standard Olympus fare with xD and microSD being the order of the day.

Performance and image quality

One of the immediate things we noticed with the Tough 6000 was the slow response in turning on. We waited around 2.7 seconds for the camera to be ready to take its first shot, and from there, shutter lag only increased with the wait time from shot-to-shot averaging out at approximately 2 seconds.

Image quality wasn't astounding either, being on-par with the experience we had with the Tough 8000. Saturation levels were acceptable, and greens and blues in particular looked very nice (which definitely helps in underwater photography), but there was a distinct level of graininess especially on photos taken in low light. The camera also liked to clip highlights in bright situations, however, this is a tendency that most cameras with small (1/2.3-inch) sensors display.

Focus tended to drop off towards the edges of the frame, and the lens displayed moderate amounts of barrel distortion at the widest end, though not anything too extreme that could not be corrected in post-processing. Noise was almost the same as what we experienced on the Tough 8000, with anything above ISO 400 proving incredibly grainy, and ISO 1600 being practically unusable. Chromatic aberration wasn’t too much of an issue, but it did exhibit itself mostly in cyan or halo-like guises.

Click image to enlarge (Credit: Olympus)

We also experienced a strange non-responsive issue where the Tough 6000 would not power off or change out of a setting even when we pressed the power button repeatedly and held it down — the only solution was to remove the battery and start again. Also, all the so-called invincible waterproofing and ruggedness aside, Olympus has fairly stringent guidelines to maintaining these features, and it is best to acquaint yourself with the procedures before you begin throwing your AU$600 piece of photographic equipment off your balcony.

Conclusion

The Tough 6000 is a capable, rugged camera, but when we stack it against its competitors from Panasonic and Canon, we're not sure how it will stand up. These other cameras have better specifications and from our hands-on experience with the Panasonic FT1, produce better images. That said, we much prefer the Tough 6000 to the Tough 8000, so unless you need crushproofing and extreme underwater capabilities, choose the less expensive of the two.

Topics: tough, olympus, mju, digital camera, 6000, camera, rugged

Comments (5)

  • Kate gave a review on 30/08/2009 09:05 Report abuse

    • Good: compact and schockproof
    • Bad: everything else

    I feel extremely dissapointed. I had a canon camera which was not underwater but the image quality was FANTASTIC. I decided to buy a waterproof camera and I went for the Tough 6000 and I am extremely dissapointed,the image quality is not as good, and yes it takes ages to take a picture and it doesnt come close to my previous canon'

  • Kfunk gave 8/10 on 25/07/2009 20:19 Report abuse

    • Good: Underwater shots, design feel
    • Bad: Haven't found one yet

    I like the ways it feels when taking a picture. Like knowing it can go under water and take a buit of battering. I was advised by salesman that the Panasonic was the better camera however it was bulky and i need compact. The price they were able to provide was to hard to resist as the other 8000 and panasonic were well over $120 more. All and all a neat camera.

  • Indy gave 9/10 on 23/07/2009 20:47 Report abuse

    • Good: Really nice design, Nice shots underwater, Flash doesn't blow out images, scene modes help produce good shots
    • Bad: xD card

    I have had several underwater cameras and have loved them. I didn't think I would use them under water as much as I do. I know the importance of cleaning the seals and wash it after every beach outing. I have never had any water leaking issues as previously mentioned. A friend bought the Panasonic and returned it as the screws started to corrode. They are not stainless steel. He dropped it from the kitchen bench and it broke around the lens. The 6000 is a great camera and my 2 yr old carries it around and takes photos with it all the time. I wouldn't let her do that with any other camera.
    Buy it, you'll have a lot of fun.

  • stuart gave 2/10 on 29/03/2009 18:16 Report abuse

    • Good: It goes underwater (for a while)
    • Bad: Everything else...

    Ok, the lens got irreparably scratched because of some sand between the lens protecting slide and the lens. Nice. Other than that, water got in (yes I did check all the seals before going in the water) and the front labeling (12mp, olympus) is coming of. Got an 8000 model before this, that had something in the camera in front of the lens before I returned it.

    Other than that, the movie quality is low and the pictures aren't that good.

    Sending it in for repairs is not an option when traveling around Australia so I hope the Panasonic will be released soon. Very disappointed.

  • jeist gave 3/10 on 25/03/2009 08:16 Report abuse

    • Good: its Tough
    • Bad: takes to long to take the picture.

    I Bought one of these cameras and took it back 2 days later. if you want point and shoot and dont want to miss the dont get this camera. Buy the time it takes the picture its allready gone.

Post your own

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 & A..F

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

The Explain Series

Where to buy Olympus Mju Tough 6000

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder

Recently viewed products