Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX3

• Specs: Digital compact • 6 megapixels • 2.5 inch • 3 x • See more specifications
• RRP: AU$549.00

Topics: panasonic, compact, lumix, dmc-fx3, digital camera

• 

  SeanK gave 9/10 on 25/12/2006 15:20

  • Good: Large, bright 2.5 inch LCD
    Compact, Lightweight body
    Very nice looking camera
    
  • Bad: Buttons on the smallish side.
    Included memory only stores a handful of pictures.

  Very nice camera, i purchased for $200.00 from Circuit City. I also purchased a 1GB SD memory card and a camera case ( I would recommend everyone buy these items)

  • Reply
  • Reply to review
  • Report offensive content
• 

  Anonymous gave 9/10 on 30/10/2006 03:20

  Easy to use and more features

  • Reply
  • Reply to review
  • Report offensive content
• 

  Panny lover gave 9/10 on 24/10/2006 11:00

  • Good: Size. I thought my TZ10 was portable, but this is even smaller. Rounded edges make it easy to pocket. Flat black is looks great. Very lightweight too. Easy to use. Great pics. Fast startup and best shutter lag around. Battery life very good.
  • Bad: No zoom on movie mode, like my TZ10. Battery is not same either, so yet another charger on the shelf. Only 3X zoom. 4X or 5X would have been better.

  So far so good

  Only had a few days, but great first impression. $246 at Circuit City on sale. When will someone supply a decent sized card??

  • Reply
  • Reply to review
  • Report offensive content
• 

  ComposerCK gave 8/10 on 11/10/2006 17:06

  • Good: I like the style of it, and how small it is. It's also very easy to use. It's good that it features image stablisation.
  • Bad: It might not be as robust as I'd like. I want my camera to be able to handle a bit of salt water and sand.

  Compact but Powerful

  Why can't they make the flash create a LESS STARK image ? Maybe the flash could put out a bright yellow light, instead of bright white. I hate flash, it always makes me squint in photo's ...... : (

  • Reply
  • Reply to review
  • Report offensive content
• 

  Anonymous gave 10/10 on 04/10/2006 23:33

  Petr dddddddd

  • Reply
  • Reply to review
  • Report offensive content