Power consumption: How much are your gadgets costing you?

(Give one hour back to our earth image by tammyjq41, CC2.0)

Earth Hour started out in Sydney just two years ago as a pie-in-the-sky idea, but its amazing momentum will this year see residents of 2848 cities in 84 countries switching off their lights in a show of solidarity for the cause of reducing energy consumption.

While it's only saving a trickle of electricity compared with the amount the world's cities guzzle every day of the year, the strong support for Earth Hour can only help raise awareness of the need to monitor and control electricity consumption.

The connected (and expensive) home

For those who have invested in high-tech gear for the home, the need to monitor energy consumption may well have become apparent upon receipt of the first electricity bill. Just how much consumption has increased is a subject of no small contention — estimates that gadgets on standby consume around 10 per cent of a household's power supply are often bandied about as a rule of thumb, but don't necessarily stand up to scrutiny.

Nonetheless, there is no doubt that today's connected homes are more power-hungry than ever. From plasma TVs that may be left running when nobody's watching them, to games consoles idling unplayed, media centre PCs, home media servers and external hard drives buzzing away 24/7, to computers left running when unused — there are more ways than ever for your local electricity retailer to be jumping with joy.

Even in standby mode, conventional wisdom has been that many devices suck down power; combine this with their always-on nature, and the bills rack up fast. Yet while many conservation advocates recommend turning off appliances at the switch, this doesn't work so well for computer equipment.

Hard drives and memory sticks, for example, should be disconnected by the operating system before being powered off to ensure data integrity. In homes with voice over IP services running, broadband routers must be left on all the time to ensure continuous service. And for those people streaming music or video libraries around their homes, the computer must be left on all the time. And, as many parents have found out, turning off video-game consoles without giving the kids time to save their progress will inevitably end in harsh recriminations.

All this adds up to two things: first, turning your stuff off for Earth Hour takes more than just a few casual flicks of the switch. And second, that it's helpful to know just how much power your connected home is consuming, so you can balance the inconvenience of switching off with the real value it delivers.

(Credit: David Braue)

Measuring consumption

I have a personal interest in power consumption: last year, I documented the process of setting up a home network that included a central network attached storage box on which I can store, and automatically back up, everything from documents to a music library to photos. It's working fine, but to say that I haven't noticed a rise in electricity bills would be lying.

Curious as to how much of this is related to the connected home, I purchased a specialised electrical meter (a no-name unit from Zazz.com.au that measures usage of devices plugged into it. Electrical purists out there may scoff at using such a seemingly basic meter, and there may be arguments that this task rightly required a high-end meter costing thousands of dollars — or, perhaps, not. But it's more electrical meter than I had previously.

Measuring consumption using a meter like this is easy: plug in the meter to your mains point, plug in your device to the meter, and push the button to cycle through the readings. Once we have readings, we can assign a cost to the consumption and figure out just how much that Earth Hour is going to save us.

And the winner is…

Every device in the house was unplugged, plugged into the meter, and plugged in again, and consumption measured during normal running time. Where a device had a standby mode, consumption was also measured. Results were as follows:

Device Mode Amps Watts Consumption in 1 hour (kWh) Cost per hour (at $0.1561 per kWh) Cost per day Cost per month Cost per year
HOME ENTERTAINMENT
42-inch plasma TV Operating 1.48 346 0.346 $0.0540 $1.2963 $38.89 $466.65
Standby 0.09 21 0.021 $0.0033 $0.0787 $2.36 $28.32
HDTV box Operating 0.08 19 0.019 $0.0030 $0.0712 $2.14 $25.63
Standby 0.03 7 0.007 $0.0011 $0.0262 $0.79 $9.44
Networked PVR On 0.06 14 0.014 $0.0022 $0.0524 $1.57 $18.88
Nintendo Wii On 0.07 16 0.016 $0.0025 $0.0599 $1.80 $21.58
Pioneer DVD recorder On 0.12 28 0.028 $0.0044 $0.1049 $3.15 $37.76
HOME NETWORK
Linksys wireless LAN router On 0.08 11 0.011 $0.0017 $0.0412 $1.24 $14.84
D-Link Ethernet switch On 0.04 10 0.01 $0.0016 $0.0375 $1.12 $13.49
QNAP NAS On 0.1 23 0.023 $0.0036 $0.0862 $2.59 $31.02
Belkin ADSL2+ modem On 0.03 5 0.005 $0.0008 $0.0187 $0.56 $6.74
IT EQUIPMENT
Apple iMac On 0.45 108 0.108 $0.0169 $0.4046 $12.14 $145.66
Sleep 0.03 7 0.007 $0.0011 $0.0262 $0.79 $9.44
Windows PC Pentium 4 On 0.34 90 0.09 $0.0140 $0.3372 $10.12 $121.38
15-inch LCD monitor On 0.11 26 0.026 $0.0041 $0.0974 $2.92 $35.07
Uninterruptible power supply On / charging 0.08 19 0.019 $0.0030 $0.0712 $2.14 $25.63
Brother multi-function printer On 0.03 7 0.007 $0.0011 $0.0262 $0.79 $9.44
LaCie external hard drive On 0.04 9 0.009 $0.0014 $0.0337 $1.01 $12.14
Sony Vaio notebook PC Operating 0.17 35 0.035 $0.0055 $0.1311 $3.93 $47.20
Standby/charging 0.05 11 0.011 $0.0017 $0.0412 $1.24 $14.84
LIGHTING
Incandescent lamp [60W Mirabella] 0.23 53 0.053 $0.0083 $0.1986 $5.96 $71.48
Energy-saving lamp (13W 240V 6400K temperature) 0.04 9 0.009 $0.0014 $0.0337 $1.01 $12.14
Downlight 0.21 50 0.050 $0.0078 $0.1873 $5.62 $67.44

Power factor was 100 in all cases and voltage did not vary significantly from the 240VAC ideal. Costs calculated at $0.1561 per kWh.

The results showed a few surprises. First, most of the electronics equipment really isn't sucking down that much power; networking equipment, for example, weighed in at as little as 5W for the ADSL2+ modem and 11W for the wireless router. The NAS, which has two hard drives spinning constantly, was unsurprisingly a higher consumer of electricity, chewing up the equivalent of 8.6 cents per day ($2.40 per month) of electricity. Taken together, the network components cost $5.51 per month, or just over $66 per year, to run.

Making sense of electricity

If you don't know what they mean, here's a quick summary that makes most sense if you think of your electricity supply as a river:

  • Volts is the width of the river
  • Amps is the depth of the river — eg, how much water is coursing along the riverbed at any given time
  • Power Factor reflects the efficiency of mains (AC) power transmission. A low power factor is like having big rocks on the bottom obstructing the flow of water, while the ideal — a rock-free river — is represented as a power factor of 100 per cent.
  • Watts = Volts x Amps x Power Factor, and is an overall measurement of relative power consumption. If your river had a waterfall, its wattage would reflect how much water was going over the edge at any point in time.
  • 1 kilowatt = 1000 watts

1 kilowatt-hour represents the usage of one kilowatt of energy for an hour. This is the basic unit by which electricity is charged. If you run a 100-watt electrical bulb for 10 hours, you have used 1kWh of energy. This is analogous to measuring the amount of water traversing your waterfall for an hour.

For devices that plug into the mains outlet, voltage will always be 240. Therefore, to measure consumption, we ultimately want to measure and compare the number of watts each device consumes.

The largest single consumer of power was, as predicted, the plasma TV, which chews through well over 300W or $0.05 per hour of electricity. That's the equivalent of $38.89 per month, although few families would, of course, leave their TVs running 24/7. Even with the TV going eight hours a day, however, you'd be paying about $13 per month while it's running and a further $1.57 for standby power if you put it in standby.

Adding in the other A/V components raised total lounge-room electricity consumption to $47.54 per month, although as mentioned above putting the plasma in standby mode when not used saved considerably. Running the A/V components in standby for a month would cost just $3.15, since many of the components reverted to a reported zero power consumption in standby mode.

This last finding raises an interesting counter-argument to the claims that energy-conscious consumers should turn off their TVs and other devices at the switch. The amount of power saved from this action is actually relatively insignificant: given that a single 60W lightbulb burns $5.96 worth of electricity per month, you'll make a much bigger dent in your energy consumption simply by remembering to turn off the lights. This is doubly the case if you have downlights, which typically consume 50W — which equates to 200W in an average four-light room, costing $0.03 per hour or $0.72 a day to run.

If you're serious about cutting your electricity bill, consider dimmer switches or changing to low-power illumination: a stand-alone lamp we tested, which uses a 13W 6400-kelvin high-efficiency bulb, consumes just $0.03 per day — one-sixth the cost of incandescents.

Computers were another thing entirely. While peripherals such as the printer burn almost no power, the iMac weighed in at a steady consumption rate of about 108W, although this increased to about 125W during periods of hard disk activity and other additional power draw.

Leaving the computer running 24/7 would consume $12.14 per month, or $145.66 per year in electricity; on the contrary, even just putting it into sleep mode for 16 hours a day (while you're at work and asleep) cuts the total bill to $4.57 per month.

Since sleep mode can be automatically activated whenever you haven't used the computer for a little while, that's $100 a year you really don't need to spend. This is particularly relevant for those who have set up a dedicated media centre PC in their lounge room: because it's a full-fledged computer, make sure your media centre box is automatically going into standby whenever you're not using it.

But what of Earth Hour? Turning out the network gear for an hour will save $0.0076 worth of electricity. Turning off the TV for an hour will save $0.054. Turning off the computer might save just under two cents. And you'll save $0.0083 for each light you don't burn during that hour. Flip your circuit breaker and go out for candlelight dinner, and you may save five to 10 cents' worth of electricity by taking your house off the grid completely.

It may not seem like much, and these figures suggest that home networking set-ups only marginally increase household consumption compared to that drained by today's power-hungry TVs and that perennial suspect, the incandescent light.

The multiplier effect, however, is where Earth Day really proves its worth. If Australia's 10 million households each saved five cents' worth of electricity — 0.32kWh each — that would be the equivalent of 3.2 million kWh saved — the equivalent of 13,760 tonnes of CO2. Extrapolate this to even more energy-hungry businesses here, and the much larger number of homes and businesses participating in Earth Hour, and you're not doing too badly.



Add Your Comment 18


Post comment as
 

TED posted a comment   
Australia

True the overall effect of all these consumers turning off their appliances & lights will use that much less power, but will the suppliers really wind down their turbines for 60min, then wind them back up to save the 13,000 tonnes of CO2? I think although there may be a little saving in CO2 pumped into the atmosphere, it would really be a much smaller figure saved in the long run.

 

TED posted a comment   
Australia

True the overall effect of all these consumers turning their appliances

 

phild01 posted a comment   
Australia

Musick7. Are people so so stupid that they can't find picture controls and do a sensible adjustment.
Professional calibration..yeah right, you need to get your hand off it.

 

phild01 posted a comment   
Australia

Musick7. Are people so stupid that they don't know how to adjust their picture to an ideal level. So what is so different about the so called professional calibration!
Yes, the comment about power reduction is correct but calibration... yeah right get your hand off it1

 

dumb arse posted a comment   

i do all micro off dvd off wii off washing machine and all the rest but i cant get a straght answer on solar that makes sence to a bloke that knows f al about kw kwh bhp rec , am i the only one ?

 

Pano posted a comment   

The majority of electricity is consumed by a computer when it starts up. I'm afraid that putting it to sleep and back on 10 times or more per day, would consume more electricity than if you'd just let it on the whole time. I guess in the end it comes down to trial and error with a electricity consumption device. Thanks, Great Article!

 

lxrose posted a comment   

Plasma TV is really bad at power. LED TVs has standby power less than 1 W, some of them even 0.2W.

 

Musick7 posted a reply   

@lxrose, and others =)

You are somewhat correct... If you purchase a Plasma TV bring it home and take it out of the box and use it just as it is, it uses alot more power. But, if you by that same Plasma TV bring it home put about 120 hours of use on it, Call a Professional ISF Technician to come out and Calibrate your New Plasma TV to the Correct settings & Color Temperature, That same Plasma that used A Lot more power now uses about the same as that LCD you referred to. =)

But most People don't even know what an ISF Calibration is or does... They just think you buy a TV bring it home, take it out of the box, hook it up and turn it on. Some people try and fumble around with the remote and mess with the color adjustments and think they are improving the picture quality but that isn't the case. If you spend the extra $200.00 plus (Depending where you live, it could be as much as $500.00) and have a Professional ISF Calibrator come out and Setup your TV the way it should be, you will actually spend alot less than what the owners manual says it will cost you to operate that TV.
An ISF calibration not only uses the remote, but they actually go into the Service menu and REPROGRAM your TV to the "Hollywood" Film Standard. This is the way the Director intended you to view the Colors within the film. You will never get that quality with you and your remote.

We had our Panasonic Plasma Calibrated, and you could feel the Screen temperature difference when he was done. Before we had an ISF calibration done to it, the Living room was about 10 degrees hotter. You could feel the heat from the screen about 3 feet away. After the ISF Cal. the heat from the screen is about 1 inch away now.

Big difference!!! If you have a Plasma or LCD, spend the extra money and get your TV Calibrated to the ISF Standard.

 

lxrose posted a comment   

Yes. Good calculations and good to know what cost how much, but let's not forget about candlelights, which produce more CO2 than all of our devices we use otherwise.

 

befrugal posted a comment   

Its easy to miss the point with all this bs. A little like the hype of household budgeting. If you want to save MONEY just don't spend it !. If you want to conserve ENERGY just don't use it ! If you are not using the light or appliance SWITCH IT OFF !! Or better still - DONT TURN IT ON UNLESS YOU REALLY NEED IT.


Sponsored Links

Recently Viewed Products