Lexmark X4550

By Felisa Yang on 23/07/2007

More Lexmark reviews , RRP: AU$199.00

The good:

  • Built-in wireless networking
  • Good colour scans
  • Onboard memory card slots and PictBridge port
  • Speedy text prints

The bad:

  • Print quality needs improvement
  • Very slow 4x6 photo prints

The bottomline:

The Lexmark X4550 offers what most all-in-ones in this price range don't: wireless networking. Casual home users who value network-readiness will love that feature, but users who want better print quality will be happier with a different machine.

Editors' rating:

6.4/10

Users' rating:

5.5/10

The Lexmark X4550 is a high-end version of the X3550, which we reviewed recently. The two printers offer the same design and feature set, with the exception that the X4550 adds wireless networking for an additional AU$70 (though it lacks an Ethernet port for wired networking). The X4550 is also rated to perform more quickly than the X3550, so the focus this review will be on performance since the two printers are so similar otherwise. (For an overview and analysis of the X4550's design, feature set, and support package, please refer to the review of the X3550.)

Overall, the Lexmark X4550 produces mediocre prints and is a bit slow at tasks other than text printing. Its big draw is the fact that not only is it a AU$199 network-ready machine, but it comes with wireless networking standard. If you're a casual home user who prioritises network-readiness, the Lexmark X4550 is a bargain. But if your focus is on print quality, check out the Canon Pixma MP460.

When compared to its comparably priced competition, the Lexmark X4550 proved to be quick with text prints and greyscale scans. But it was positively sluggish at graphics prints and 4x6 photos, as well as pokey with colour scans. It scored 7.66 pages per minute for black text, a full page faster than the Canon Pixma MP510. But it scored a slow 1.04ppm for colour graphics. Even worse was its photo print speed: a mere 0.40ppm for a 4x6 photo. The HP Photosmart C5280 was the next slowest, but still nearly doubled the pace with a score of 0.76ppm. The X4550 came back with greyscale scans -- 5.74ppm -- but faltered with colour scans -- 4.77ppm. Comparing the X4550 to the X3550, the former beat the latter soundly at text prints but fell a bit behind with graphics prints and scans. It was soundly trounced, too, in 4x6 photo prints.

CNET Labs' inkjet multifunction speed tests (pages per minute)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Colour scan  
Greyscale scan  
4x6 photo  
Graphics  
Text  
Lexmark X4550
4.77 
5.74 
0.4 
1.04 
7.66 
Canon Pixma MP510*
5.2 
5.28 
1.26 
2.09 
6.37 
Canon Pixma MP460
5.6 
5.68 
1.36 
1.62 
5.8 
HP Photosmart C5280
8.1 
3.26 
0.76 
2.07 
5.53 
Lexmark X3550
4.45 
5.36 
0.77 
1.9 
4.34 
Note: *The Canon Pixma MP510's photo score is for an 8x10 print.

CNET Labs' inkjet multifunction quality
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Colour scan  
Greyscale scan  
Photo  
Graphics  
Text  
Canon Pixma MP460
Fair 
Good 
Excellent 
Excellent 
Excellent 
Canon Pixma MP510
Good 
Good 
Excellent 
Excellent 
Good 
HP Photosmart C5280
Excellent 
Good 
Good 
Good 
Fair 
Lexmark X4550
Good 
Fair 
Fair 
Fair 
Fair 

The X4550's text print quality left a lot to be desired on our tests. Black text tended toward dark grey rather than true black. Additionally, we saw a lot of jagged edges and wicking, even though we printed on Lexmark's premium paper. The colour graphics print suffered from some of the same problems. Straight edges showed jaggedness instead of clean, sharp lines. The colour had a faded look and the photo elements were a bit grainy. And colour blocks showed very faint horizontal striations. The 4x6 photo print was also just okay. Details need to be sharpened, and we saw evidence of graininess and horizontal striations, though they weren't as evident as what we saw in the graphics prints. The photo colour could also stand to be a bit brighter and warmer.

The greyscale scan showed obvious compression in both ends: we lost details in both the shadow and highlight areas of the image, though otherwise, details were sharp. The X4550 did its best work with the colour scan: colours were true and details sharp. Overall, the X4550 will suffice for casual home users, but more demanding users should look at the Canon Pixma MP460 -- the same amount of money will get you better print quality across the board, though text prints will be bit slower, and it's not network-ready.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

oban
10/10/2008, 08:12 PM

rating
6
/10

Good low-use printer. Wirelss can be difficult to set up, but was able to be done for printing and scanning. I had a warranty issue: rolls at the infeed not picking up the paper. First call for help resulted in instruction "remove print cartridges and shake upside down". Not reasurring at all! Second call was more logical and resulted in Lexmark exchanging the unit in a professional manner.

Pros: Wireless sets you free

Cons: Wirelesscan be fiddly to set up: a good wirelss signal is CRITICAL for setup.

Report offensive comment

NEB007
23/09/2008, 10:17 PM

rating
8
/10

I have to say that this is one of the best purchases i have made in a long time. In fact, i don't know what all the complaining is about.

The pleasant fellow at office works pointed me to its direction, "this is the one you wont". To say the least i was sceptical, having never bought a Lexmark product before, but i was happily surprised.

Scanning/Copying: excellent - for both text and images i found the quality to be more than acceptable.

Printing: Ok, its not super good, but its not all bad. In my instance, i found that printing from InDesign PDF produced better than expected quality, especially comparing screen to print colour results. Not as bad as people say..

Wireless: Took me about 20 minutes to setup, but its not rocket science! Works like a charm - printing and scanning wirelessly = :)

Price: AU$

Pros: Good all round multifunction, with great scanning features and reasonable printing

Wireless - simply convenient

The price - $90.00 with the rebate - seriously how can you complain about quality when the price is soooo low!

Cons: Wireless can be tricky to setup

Report offensive comment

aslkjdfhuiwerwfsdf
09/07/2008, 10:47 AM

rating
2
/10

Scanning over the network fails for most users. Lexmark won't fix the problem. I won't ever trust them again.

Pros: Compact. Wireless printing

Cons: Wireless scanning doesn't work for most people.

Report offensive comment

Trimega
21/09/2007, 04:27 PM

rating
6
/10

Well, they're right about print quality not being exactly brilliant, but it is acceptable if you're just printing plain old Word docs. I love the convenience of wireless. Also, I got mine for only $150 after cashback so, not complaining. I still have a "proper" printer as standby when I want photo printing.

Pros: Wireless
Affordable
Easy set up
Cashback offer

Cons: Print quality merely acceptable.

Report offensive comment

  • Leave a comment

All fields marked with * are required

What do you think

Rate this product:

Need help? Read our guidelines for what each number rating represents.

Your e-mail will not be displayed

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars.

  • Brother MFC-6490CW

  • HP Photosmart C6380

  • Australia's giant e-waste recycling centre: Photos

  • Lexmark X7675

  • Epson Stylus CX5500

  • HP Photosmart C5380

  • Compact 3D printer lets you create your own toys

  • Lexmark's new printers turn green

  • Epson Stylus Photo TX700W

More articles »

Find the right printer

Brand
  • Multiple options can be selected

    Membership benefits

    Win prizes and other promotion benefits

    Win prizes and other promotion benefits

    As a CNET Australia member, you're eligible to enter and win any prizes on our site. Sign up for a free CNET Australia membership now!