Samsung Galaxy Gio

The Samsung Galaxy Gio is outstanding value for money, basically delivering last year's best smartphone experience in a cheaper, affordable package.


8.5
CNET Rating

View more from Samsung »

About The Author

CNET Editor

Joe capitalises on a life-long love of blinking lights and upbeat MIDI soundtracks covering the latest developments in smartphones and tablet computers. When not ruining his eyesight staring at small screens, Joe ruins his eyesight playing video games and watching movies. Twitter: @Joseph_Hanlon


Design

Across the range of smartphones in Australia, the trend is towards lower prices for the top-tier devices, but how does this affect the pre-paid segment? Happily, while pre-paid handset prices remain fairly static, the quality of the handsets at this price point is on the up. The Galaxy Gio is an excellent example of this; for AU$149 (locked to the Optus network), you get a far better phone than the phones in this price range last Christmas.

The Gio is solidly designed, although its frame is constructed entirely from plastic, and Samsung retains the good looks of its more expensive handsets. A faux-steel rim surrounds the edge of the Gio, and we like the dimpled texture across the battery cover.

The screen doesn't sound great on paper; we've criticised other phones with 3.2-inch HVGA displays recently, but this screen appears to be noticeably easier to read than the others, and the colours looks vibrant, too. Off-axis viewing can be troublesome, but, for most daily smartphone use, this screen will do just fine.

The handset includes the range of ports and slots that we saw on phones 12 months ago, with a single micro-USB port for charging and data transfers, a dedicated 3.5mm headphone socket and a microSD card slot handily located on the right-hand side of the phone. There's no camera button (you use software buttons to take photos), and no HDMI port — but then, we wouldn't expect that in an AU$150 phone.

User experience

Probably the best part of this pre-paid package is that Samsung basically delivers the same user experience that you get in last year's top-end Galaxy S smartphone, but for a fraction of the price. Samsung's TouchWiz UI is employed here, which gives you seven home screens to customise with widgets and a clean, horizontally scrolling apps drawer, which is really easy to navigate quickly.

Features

When you're browsing pre-paid smartphones, it's common to wonder, "what doesn't this phone have?" rather than looking for what's included. Impressively, this list is rather short. The Gio supports 3G browsing on the Optus network (900 and 2100Mhz UMTS frequencies), Wi-Fi, GPS and Bluetooth. Samsung includes social networking apps and Navigon maps out of the box, plus DLNA media sharing, so you can share pictures, music and video with a compatible TV or Blu-Ray/DVD player over Wi-Fi.

There's also a 3-megapixel camera included in this package, with auto-focus software and a range of scene modes, smile detection and a panorama shooting mode. There's no flash for illuminating dark scenes, so you'll want to avoid nightclubs with the Gio, but otherwise the photos are reasonably good.

The Gio runs on Android Froyo version 2.2, and although this is a few generations older than the latest Android systems, we haven't noticed any major downsides during our tests. With 2.2, you have the ability to create a Wi-Fi hotspot and share your 3G data with a computer or tablet, and speech-to-text functionality for creating text messages and emails without typing. Samsung also improves keyboard input by including Swype software, allowing you to compose messages with continuous swiping gestures rather than tapping at the screen.

Performance

For AU$149, we can't say that we expected too much performance out of this pre-paid handset, so we were extremely impressed with what we discovered when using the Gio. This user experience is extremely punchy for a phone with an 800MHz processor. Samsung has done a great job of stripping back its system to its leanest, and the result is an extremely responsive system that reacts to input immediately. Turning the phone on, jumping to menus, scrolling across pages of apps — all of the daily tasks happen without any delay or any stuttering in the animation.

Battery life is good, but not remarkable in any way. The handset's 1350mAh capacity battery is generous for a phone of this size, but, with regular use of the internet, email and social networks, we found that we charged the Gio every second day.

Overall

If you're looking to dodge a carrier contract and have AU$200 to spend on a phone, we highly recommend the Galaxy Gio. It's 3.2-inch display is better than its rivals, and the performance of this system is outstanding. It runs an older version of the Android OS than most other phones in the market at this time, but this doesn't hold it back in any way that we could find. The Galaxy Gio is outstanding value for money.


Add Your Review 16


* Below fields optional


Post comment as
 

nivek1960 posted a comment   
Canada

NIVEK60

Actually purchased the phone and works very well compared to buddies I-Phones,and 4G phones that they paid 500 to 600 hundred dollars for maybe 400 Mhz of speed and a flash ,buy a camera LOL.

Also the touch in touch screen functions you boneheads are arguing about ,came along years before your debate.Read and weep and oh STFU.

The HP-150 from 1983 was one of the world's earliest commercial touchscreen computers. Similar to the PLATO IV system, the touch technology used employed infrared transmitters and receivers mounted around the bezel of its 9" Sony Cathode Ray Tube (CRT), which detected the position of any non-transparent object on the screen.

An early attempt at a handheld game console with touchscreen controls was Sega's intended successor to the Game Gear, though the device was ultimately shelved and never released due to the expensive cost of touchscreen technology in the early 1990s. Touchscreens would not be popularly used for video games until the release of the Nintendo DS in 2004.[9]


GET THE PICTURE ,Probably Not LOL

 

MitchellT posted a comment   

upgrade it to android 2.3.4 so much better user experience!

 

MitchellT posted a comment   

upgrade it to android 2.3.4 so much better user experience!

 

davidatscpc posted a comment   
Australia

Is this the same as the Samsung Galaxy Gio S5660 (Australian Stock)?

 

davidatscpc posted a comment   
Australia

Is this the same as the Samsung Galaxy Gio S5660 (Australian Stock)

 

MadelineT posted a comment   

So back to the original point. Do any Gio users have anything useful to say about this phone?

 

dmt0328 posted a comment   
Australia

okay...dunners doesn't even deserve a reply to that post above, he has failed to see what the rest of the non geek world has seen, ill just leave it at that.

Will...
Please stop saying that you can't see which phones are cheap iPhone knockoffs... it is quite obvious, and Jo the reviewer has on so many occasions reviewed phones which are blatant iPhone knockoffs...His omni a icon review in particular highlights this...

Anyway, it appears that you have been looking hard for a phone that was as full features as an iPhone, but released before...

Unfortunately if you actually read the review of that phone, you will see that it actually has a massive flip out keyboard (because Lg couldn't make a full featured and essentially butonless phone, defiantly a lil more than 2 extra buttons. lol), has NO 3G, is a cheap plasticky build and had a horrible touch screen almost to the point that it is not useable. If you don't believe me read the review...its all there. The reviewer even says that it is a POST iPhone product that people may have bought because they couldn't wait for the iPhone to get here...i.e. The iPhone was literally LIGHTYEARS ahead. anyway nice try.

Also, please don't call yourself a uni student, its actually quite embarrassing for real uni students to hear, considering your retarded spelling. I'm not talking about basic typos I'm talking blatant incorrect spelling which my year 3 brother could spell... you must be either an arts or science student...

 

Will1505 posted a reply   

yeah spelling has never been my strong point, not that i care that much, you can still read it and i still get my point across, at least the grammar is half decent. on the other note i'm actually a health science student, going into my final year of a four year course, i doubt you could say the same.
talking about a three year old, i taught my niece how to use an android device (including the multitasking system). But yes i can see how you would find it complicated.
on the other note, i knew the LG was a bad phone, but AGAIN you missed the point. wasn't hard to find too :). also just a reminder, the first iphone wasn't a 3G phone either (however this phone never came to australia).
I don't know, you and i may see innovative differently. I see it as being the first designed and created, you may see it differently.

 

dmt0328 posted a reply   
Australia

yeah, i guess we do see it differently...very, very differently.

Good luck with the course, sorry if i **** you off, i get kinda frustrated, thats my weak point i guess.

anyways good luck with the course.

 

Will1505 posted a reply   

good luck with you too sir. never annoyed, more entertaining that anything

 

dmt0328 posted a reply   
Australia

haha yeah, true. tbh i enjoyed checking what you had to say. lol

 

Dunners posted a comment   
Australia

1
I agree.
I dunno how Google who started the Android project in 2005 can copy iOS which was released in 2007..?

That means dmt0328 must be wrong.... but i bet that won't stop him trying to convince people anyway.

Dmt0328 i challenge you to produce a list of features iOS had first and then we can show you how wrong you are and how much your beloved Apple has copied. :)

 

dmt0328 posted a reply   
Australia

alright since u and will are both equally intellectually challenged, I'm only going to reply to your pathetic post (his is too pathetic to warrant a reply)

wow....where to begin.

You do realise you are comparing two VERY different things when you say "I dunno how Google who started the Android project in 2005 can copy iOS which was released in 2007..?"

Just because Google started their project in 2005 doesn't mean they began innovating first. Just because the iPhone was released in 2007 doesn't mean that january 2007 was the first time apple developed the software. They usually develop software before they release it (handy tip). Apple may have started the iOS project in 2000? starting the project is irrelevant, because for all we know Android could have been a simple subsidiary that was purchased by google to develop web applications or something? nobody knows? Google may have only started using Andriod in response to Apples dominance after the iPhone release after seeing all the other hopeless manufacturers attempt to make an OS. So again, please refrain from unintelligent bouts of bias as they make for a poor story. If you want to compare on an even foot, why not compare the release dates of both companies....hmmmm. lets see.
Oh yes! iOS was released in January 2007, and Andriod in September 2008??? How can that be. Almost 2 years later? How is that possible, that must mean that Android made a pathetic 2 year scramble to copy apple. No, your right, Android are the true innovators. innovation usually involves producing something new (actual definition). so by simple use of logic, there is no way Android is innovative.

I don't need a full list of features, because most features from both android and apple are standardised smart phone kit. i.e basically the same.

What apple has done with the iPhone is simply create the first mainstream, butonless, multi and capacitive touch smartphone, which all Android smartphones aspire to be today. i.e. copying from Apples Innovation.

Then theres the App store. clearly the biggest copy (and if you and Will cannot see this... then maybe a trip back to kindergarten is in order to develop basic understanding and comprehension)

Sure, the Android market has a number of apps (most quite bad) but it will never compare to the app store in terms of quality apps. ever. developers simply prefer working with Apple... and i think that says a lot.

I think I'm done with "dummers"

Will.....

quite simply, you suffer from a pathetic case of bias so please learn to state facts properly. There is no use comparing release dates with announcement dates...that is what you have done (BTW, your blatant attempt to distort real facts is only highlighting the fact that deep down, you know that the facts don't support your petty argument. Yes, Android was ANNOUNCED in November 2007, that means nothing, that was simply stating what they INTENDED to produce. Android wasn't released until late 2008, in November 2007, they were only at beta stage.
Anyway, even if i distort the facts like you have, you can see that there is ample time (10 months) for Android to create an iOS copy...
Iphone was announced in January 2007. Android in November 2007. That is 10 months in my book, and a light year in the tech world...please stop posting bs.

once again, you are filling your posts with rubbish to support your argument. Whilst the macbook pro only got the island keyboard recently, the regular macbook (now discontinued) had been using it for several years prior. What you don't seem to understand is that even if something already exists, it is only brought to the attention of competitors once apple does it. i.e. apple is the innovator. island style keyboards had been around since the 80s, on calculators and older computers. it took a company like apple to innovate and use these styles on laptops. same thing goes for multi touch and the iPod. You can sit at your little desk and blab about android, but if you two absolute lemons can't see that apple has dominated mainstream electronics since the introduction of the iPod, then your stupidity is seriously blinding you, and there is no conversing with you.
I have stated that the android platform, whilst not as stable as iOS, is quite good, almost a similar experience (since this is what android has been trying all along...to create an iPhone like experience) i prefer the apple platform due to the companies innovation, the good looking durable hardware, and the App store. All things which android can't offer. I also like having "the original"

The funny thing is that whilst you will both probably deny it, you were both probably iPhone owners. i mean what phone were u guys rocking in 2007? LG stylus phones ???
anyway... like i said before, apple is the innovator in the tech industry, and i and most of the world can se this.... you geeks... not so much

 

Dunners posted a reply   
Australia

I think that it's hilarious that you actually think your right. And i was right, i knew you would reply with some crap that you actually think iOS is magical. tut tut.

You couldn't even produce a list of features like i asked because you know that it'll make your beloved iPhone look pretty 'secondary'. You say "because most features from both android and apple are standardised smart phone kit. i.e basically the same" .... ummmmmm ... No ... the idea of a smartphone was that it broke away from the 'standardised' features. Yes Apple now has similar features compared to Android because Apple copied the features from Android. As i have mentioned previously wait and see how many ICS features are transferred into the next iOS release because they are running out of things to copy from Gingerbread.

The BETA for Android was released in 2007 shortly after iOS was released. So whats your explanation for copying now..?
That means Google did not have years to copy iOS, just a matter of months. I don't think Google are that good i'm afraid. Else did Google undergo a huge overhaul from their original beta just to make it look like iOS..?
I really don't think so, besides if that was the case (and we add in development time) it would require atleast 2-3 years until they had finished. Making Android's release date at least 2009..?

HAHAHAHA you think that Android possibly could have been purchased for web development..???? You really make me laugh when you prove how stupid you are. Android is a Mobile OS has been since Android Inc. (the company Google purchased it from) started working on it back in approx 2000. Why would they buy a company, scrap all the work that company has previously done only to reinstate it again...? Possibly once again you are wrong (i know that this is hard for you to accept) and Android has always been a Mobile OS Google just built on the original idea..

Please actually do some research before you come here and preach crap. If you did you would realise that Europe has just granted Motorola an injunction against Apple. (Proof again that Apple probably isn't as innovative as you first thought.)
Ohh and Samsung now is not only the largest mobile phone producer in the world, it's the largest SMARTPHONE producer in the world. Sucks to be second best doesn't it.

PS. on your last point, the iPhone wasn't even here in 2007, once again do your research.

 

Will1505 posted a reply   

hey dunners, i still haven't heard anything "innovative" yet, have you?

 

Dunners posted a reply   
Australia

I've been waiting for a week now, still nothing ;p

I think we'll be waiting a while :p

 

Will1505 posted a reply   

apparently apple patented the "slide to unlock" thing a couple of weeks ago. innovative stuff that is.

I feel sorry for Joe, we ruined his review of a nice phone.

 

Dunners posted a reply   
Australia

I also am sorry to Joe.

This article was brilliant untill some idiot decided that it would be a good place to compare a $149 droid to a $900 iPhone.

 

dmt0328 posted a reply   
Australia

you are actually quite stupid.

yeah sure the whole idea of a smartphone was that it broke away from standardised features bla bla bla... thats all well and good, but when you compare two smartphones, they will be quite similar in functionality, read cnet reviews, many a reviewer will often use the term "standard smartphone features" so please, once again, stfu.

i can't believe i have to go per this again....u are quite slow aren't you?

Iphone was announced in january 2007...Android Beta was announced in November 2007, i.e. for u slow tards that is a 10 month gap...plenty of time for android to recreate an iOS copy. what u are also too stupid to understand is that even if it were "a few months" (even though in reality it is 10) Android didn't really have to create a new os, all they had to do was simply use iOS. i.e copy what apple had already done. doing this would take days, not months. I also love how you classify a 10 month gap as "shortly after"... haha , you are really quite stupid. Anyway, in regards to you post about google overhauling their beta to look like iOS...i think the answer to that is yes. why else would android have been officially released a WHOLE YEAR after Beta...hmmmm? i wonder why that is? i wonder why Google would risk profiting from their OS sooner rather than later? if you can't put two and two together (which i doubt you can) then, once again, you are the stupid one. as you can see, i am the one stating facts because i know I'm right... it is usually a sign of defeat when one has to resort to such low measures like skewing facts...

Anyway, I'm not going to bother with you and will anymore, he is clearly i gimp (as can be seen from his dp) If you two lemons can't see that apple is the number one tech innovator of the 21st century and that it is because of Apple that the current smartphone as we know it exists today, then you don't even deserve to be typing on a tech forum, i also consider it a huge lack of respect, especially to Steve Jobs, who has been considered one of the greatest innovators of the past few decades, read the cnet articles, many, if not all will state this...

whilst i don't have the tech knowledge of you two geeks, i understand that this is a part of the problem. Geeks have always strived to be different, never conforming, always outcasts, This is why the geek crowd was never really captured by apple, it is too "mainstream" for you two tools, right? Too simple? yeah! lets get an OS, which is over complicated, and difficult because were different and geeky and understand electronics and how tech works! (sarcasm)

oh and will, i believe i have already stated that the iPhone was the first multi touch, buttonless, capacitive phone. Enough innovation for you? what innovation is there in your plasticky, iPhone, cheap, knock off that outshines this?

Im not even going to reply, because there is no legitimate answer to this question. Im sure you will unearth some huge bs pile, but I'm not even going to bother checking back in because i, and 99% of people out there know that there is no possible reply you can give me to the above statement. Just go and play with your plastic toy and stop posting.

 

Dunners posted a reply   
Australia

You really like to overuse the word stupid don't you..? & You get quite angry don't you..? You shouldn't get angry over this it's just a phone afterall :p

Okays point A. your the one who used the term "standardised features" all i said is that smartphones are classed as such due to them having more that "standardised features". And you keep saying that iOS and Android have "quite similar functionality", Android has more functionality and customisation. I also say that they had the functionality and features first. An idea which you openly disagree with and i have asked now a few times for you to prove me wrong and you have produced nothing. You try and change the subject to something else each time. Is this because you have nothing to produce..? Secretly you think 'ohh s**t, i think he's right'..?
Or are you just incredibly SLOW at coming up with these features..? (see what i did there..? ;P )

B. One of your change of subjects is that iOS was released first so Android must have copied. Once again you can't produce anything but a touch display and rectangular phone to prove this. Also you said announced i said released (please re-read) because i highly doubt that Apple would have shown Google enough of the iPhone to copy it at their announcement.

C. I'm a lemon..? okays interesting... But i would have said your the one with the sour grapes.

D. "lets get an OS, which is over complicated, and difficult" please justify this allegation..? I've already tried to inform you that it isnt any of these things... but YOU won't listen.

E. The iPhone isn't buttonless, and all android phones have many more buttons the the iPhone (standard is at least 4) So aren't they both different..? When it comes to button design i am happy to say that both Android and iOS are innovative. Android went with 4 menu buttons iOS went with 1 both designs haven't really been done before.

F. "cheap, knock off" once again, please justify... Is that an unfair request..?

"I'm not going to reply" is that because you have nothing left..? Everything you've thrown at Android has been proven wrong. Everytime we've given you an option to 'clear' Apples name has turned up nothing because you have nothing..?
Maybe you're ill informed because you're afraid to Google ;)

 

Will1505 posted a reply   

notice how we didn't insult you but you did? guess its just the small capacity of your brain that has to resort to that.

in relation to my photo, i'm sorry that was a uni party and it was themed. i guess no one has invited to a party before.

again with the cheap knock off's but not saying how they are? they don't look the same, they don't have the same software or hardware, how are they a knock off?

Button less? i count four on the iphone. power, main, volume rocker. Ohhhh and your going to love this....there was a phone called the LG PRADA, had two extra buttons with a call and hangup button but had a capacitive screen, and the part your going to like, released January 2007. FTW

 

dmt0328 posted a reply   
Australia

since diners can't post anything useful and has no respect for where his current knock off originated from, like i said, I'm not replying...
will, that Prada was not buttonless by any means, if you read the review, you will see that it had a massive flip out keyboard, was clunky, poorly made, and had a horrible touch screen almost to the point of not being useful, oh and it had no 3G...if anything this just makes the iPhone even more revolutionary, thanks to your desperate attempt to find what you believed to be the most iPhone like Pre iPhone phone, you have just highlighted how far ahead apple was at the time, i.e. how revolutionary they were. They also pretty much created mobile feb browsing as you know it today from your cheap knock off.

Also please don't call yourself a uni student, you are embarrassing real students who can spell. You have disgusting spelling, and as a result, I'm not going to continue talking to an 8 year old. BTW, they aren't simple spelling errors/wrong key, they are actually really bad, even in some cases missing words. for example

"i guess no one has invited to a party before"

or

"again with the cheap knock offs and not saying how they are"

or

"guess it is just the small capacity of your brain that has to resort to that"

I think you were trying to say that it was the small capacity of my brain that makes me resort to that? not sure....hmm

anyway, it is hard to take you seriously when you type like a sped, so don't worry, you too are not worth a response. You two are obviously geeks (and the dumb kind at that, which is unfortunate as there is nothing really going for you) anyway it is thus, your meekness which prevents you from seeing apples complete overhaul of the mobile phone market, because, like i said, geeks don't conform, geeks intentionally alienate themselves from normal people...that is what you are trying to do here...

 

Dunners posted a reply   
Australia

A "current knock off" proof...?
Name one thing my phone has that no other phone before the iPhone has ever had before...?
Or are you going to ignore that question because you have no answer for it like all the others?

Have i asked something unreasonable..? in any of my questions..?

Basically all i have asked is for you to back up your comments and allegations with some fact.... I didn't realise it was that hard to do...

 

Dunners posted a reply   
Australia

PS it's dunners not diners btw :)

 

dmt0328 posted a reply   
Australia

since diners can't post anything useful and has no respect for where his current knock off originated from, like i said, I'm not replying...
will, that Prada was not buttonless by any means, if you read the review, you will see that it had a massive flip out keyboard, was clunky, poorly made, and had a horrible touch screen almost to the point of not being useful, oh and it had no 3G...if anything this just makes the iPhone even more revolutionary, thanks to your desperate attempt to find what you believed to be the most iPhone like Pre iPhone phone, you have just highlighted how far ahead apple was at the time, i.e. how revolutionary they were. They also pretty much created mobile feb browsing as you know it today from your cheap knock off.

Also please don't call yourself a uni student, you are embarrassing real students who can spell. You have disgusting spelling, and as a result, I'm not going to continue talking to an 8 year old. BTW, they aren't simple spelling errors/wrong key, they are actually really bad, even in some cases missing words. for example

"i guess no one has invited to a party before"

or

"again with the cheap knock offs and not saying how they are"

or

"guess it is just the small capacity of your brain that has to resort to that"

I think you were trying to say that it was the small capacity of my brain that makes me resort to that? not sure....hmm

anyway, it is hard to take you seriously when you type like a sped, so don't worry, you too are not worth a response. You two are obviously geeks (and the dumb kind at that, which is unfortunate as there is nothing really going for you) anyway it is thus, your meekness which prevents you from seeing apples complete overhaul of the mobile phone market, because, like i said, geeks don't conform, geeks intentionally alienate themselves from normal people...that is what you are trying to do here...

 

dmt0328 posted a reply   
Australia

since diners can't post anything useful and has no respect for where his current knock off originated from, like i said, I'm not replying...
will, that Prada was not buttonless by any means, if you read the review, you will see that it had a massive flip out keyboard, was clunky, poorly made, and had a horrible touch screen almost to the point of not being useful, oh and it had no 3G...if anything this just makes the iPhone even more revolutionary, thanks to your desperate attempt to find what you believed to be the most iPhone like Pre iPhone phone, you have just highlighted how far ahead apple was at the time, i.e. how revolutionary they were. They also pretty much created mobile feb browsing as you know it today from your cheap knock off.

Also please don't call yourself a uni student, you are embarrassing real students who can spell. You have disgusting spelling, and as a result, I'm not going to continue talking to an 8 year old. BTW, they aren't simple spelling errors/wrong key, they are actually really bad, even in some cases missing words. for example

"i guess no one has invited to a party before"

or

"again with the cheap knock offs and not saying how they are"

or

"guess it is just the small capacity of your brain that has to resort to that"

I think you were trying to say that it was the small capacity of my brain that makes me resort to that? not sure....hmm

anyway, it is hard to take you seriously when you type like a sped, so don't worry, you too are not worth a response. You two are obviously geeks (and the dumb kind at that, which is unfortunate as there is nothing really going for you) anyway it is thus, your meekness which prevents you from seeing apples complete overhaul of the mobile phone market, because, like i said, geeks don't conform, geeks intentionally alienate themselves from normal people...that is what you are trying to do here...

 

Will1505 posted a reply   

looks like someone is getting irritated, love it :)

my work here is done :):):)

 

dmt0328 posted a comment   
Australia

"tell us something that apple made first and you'll shut up"...

Shutting you up is not possible, because you are just on here seeking validation for your Generic, copycat of a phone...

How about this. Apple invented the current form factor and touch interface as you and i both know it today. Please show me the phones that samsung was regurgitating up in 2007. the f480? or the Omnia... very limited and prehistoric when compared to the iPhone. Not to mention that the iPhone took the touch screen to the next level and forced the copycats at samsung to innovate and at least put effort into their products rather than churning out phone after phone just for the sake of making a few dollars. Put quite simply most android using manufacturers lack innovation and if you can't see that apple, with their iPhone has changed the mobile industry, in both Phones and Tablets then you are honestly not even worth another second, and can go and waste Dunners Time instead of mine.
"How are they Copying"...
Well the answer to this is quite simple... iOS was released first and Android followed because it could see that the iPhone was light years ahead of any other manufacturer and saw an opportunity to create a competitor to apple because Samsung, LG and Moto simply put, suck at developing an OS. A simple analysis of the market will show you that it is MUCH easier to be a follower than an innovator because the ideas have already been created... they are available for copying... So in a way you are right, android is becoming the preferred OS, but it is by the virtue of Apple Brilliance and innovation, and certainly not from the crumby phone manufacturers that support the android OS. Android is a decent OS, but again it is (much like the manufacturers copy of the iPhone design) essentially utilising the innovations of apple, and since Apple has pretty much facilitated these changes for Android, Android doesn't have much work to to really but sit and wait...
The above principles apply to almost all tech in General. How many companies have copied the macbook pro design??? I'm sure the number is quite large, the island style keyboard?? the Massive Trackpad? (which, FYI nobody has really managed).

You can blab on all you like about Android, but i can see it for what it really is...a follower, and theres nothing wrong with that, but i just prefer companies which try to think outside the box and develop/perfect something innovative. The funny thing is if the iPhone wasn't developed, Android wouldn't even exist, yet here you are...on a tech forum, trying to argue androids supremacy.

Ill let you spot the irony yourself... (if you are capable of doing so)

 

Will1505 posted a reply   

Ok let me get this straight, android was purchased by google in 2005 and released in november 2007. the first iphone was released in july 2007, thus the time to "copy" didn't exist.
Mobile windows was made before iOS, so iOS copied that following your logic.......glad you agree iOS weren't the first for anything.

How are they innovative? nothing they have made is new, nothing, they just know how to market it well.

What part of android is copied from iOS? The only think remotely close is the messaging layout. Have you seen the new iOS notification system.......they really thought hard to get that working didn't they?

What computers look like the macbook pro? the island keyboard i saw a year before on msi laptops before the pro had it.

The company that started android was around before 2005, google bought it and then fully made the operating system. Thus if apple didn't release iOS, andruid would still be around. just a history lesson for you

 

dmt0328 posted a comment   
Australia

alright. whatever. The iPhone is and aways will be (in the foreseeable future) the best selling phone. Sure Android has double the market share, but that is acquired from selling hundreds of phones under the same generic OS that can be applied to all phones ranging from 50 to 1000 dollars...and from a company that really has no experience in the area. Who would have thought that Google could create a phone operating system better than Samsung, HTC or LG ho have apparently been trying for years but could never get it right... Yet somehow Apple is the follower and is somehow not innovative...
Apple at least creates its own OS, which is why i like the product. This is not about the Hardware (although the iPhone design is clearly in demand and regularly copied by wannabe iPhones) it is about the fact that Apple has created an OS that functions the way they want it in relation to the Phone THEY designed and created.
Android is a buggy, computer like OS which is over complicated and GENERIC and can be found on even the cheapest of phones and is not optimised for any one device...GENERIC...
Then we have the App store which is light years ahead of the android market it is almost embarrassing. Android can claim the title of numbers, thats what they seem to like, but in terms of quality and optimised apps specific to a single device Apple wins this hands down with the iPhone no contest.

In relation to your list...that is the most woeful attempt at android supremacy i have ever sen. all of those.
"internet messaging"...there has been an app available for years
"voice searching" has been there for years...and FYI android sucks at this sooo bad
"twitter"......im going to leave this one alone for the sake of your dignity
"widgets"....basically what apps used to be called before apple came in and created the app revolution....

anyway nice list...

"facial recognition technology"....you should know by now that when apple does something it does it right, not just for the sake of creating something first...facial recognition tech is soooo crumby at the moment at best and apple will only touch it when the software can become more efficient than simply swiping to unlock (oh and android copied this too wahh!) or typing a code....until then Android can have that crumby tech (which has so many negatives like, what do you do when your friend borrows the phone? or there is an emergency and you have just had a stroke and your phone needs to be used to call for help???) i Really and Truly don't want nor have a need for poorly implemented facial recognition unlocking...although Apple will probably find a solution to the above problems before android ever does...
"yet Apple innovation is only skin deep".....is that still the case?

You are probably the first person i have ever heard to say that the galaxy screen is better than the iPhone...even you must know that its not about the fact if you can see pixels from 2cm away or not, the fact is the iPhone HAS got a better pixel density, which makes for very good quality games and apps, whilst not a huge difference, it is noticeable, especially when playing games and using apps.

 

Dunners posted a reply   
Australia

What you don't seem to understand is that no matter how you word it or try and put it down. Android still is the most popular mobile OS. Yes it has a completely different marketing strategy but as reports are showing, it's working and working very well.

'A company that has no experience in this area.' is what you said about Google. Was there not a time when Apple had no experience in the mobile market..?

Thats fine that Apple made their own OS, statistics are now showing that it is not the preferred OS by the majority, so whats your point..?

'Android is buggy' How is it buggy..? My phone is blazinly fast and stable. No bugs there. How is it complicated..? Any application is one or two presses away.
If i have an app i use often place it on the home screen, and it's there when i unlock my device. How can i achieve this customisation you ask..? Hold the icon and let go.. Wow thats very complicated i guess.?????
and FYI each manufacturer changes Android to suit their needs and phones. So how is it Generic..? You like just throwing negative words and hoping one sticks don't you..?

In relation to my list they are all features that have been on Android for a long time. None of which require downloading. But clearly you missed the point that all your 'new' features aren't really new at all.. They were copied :o

How can you comment on a feature that isn't even in public hands yet..? Did you smuggle a Nexus out of Google to test the facial unlocking so you can say it's 'crumbly' and inefficient.?

Your the first person i know that thinks Super AMOLED Plus isn't as good as Retina.
Read some reviews on this site, or other sites and i promise you most love if not prefer Super AMOLED Plus over anything else.
Besides my bet is that the next Galaxy Model with feature HD Super AMOLED plus. So it will have the same pixel density or higher than Retina and all the benefits of AMOLED.

I can't stress enough how much you need to use an Android phone before you criticise it like this. And by use i mean longer than playing with it for 30secs in a shop. It's common of you iPhone fans to say that Android is crummbly, cheap, plasticy and a clone. And it's just no true, all it shows is how uninformed you really are, and often just makes you look like another idiot.

 

Will1505 posted a reply   

Tell us something that Apple made first and i will shut up....

Buggy......hmmmm i worked at a phone shop. the only phone i had to replace from new ever was an iphone (the iphone 4 had issues with the graphics card), and the amount of customer that i had to do soft resets on......would have been at least two a shift.

Yeah the screen is nice but again, not something apple made so not counted......i'm sorry i prefer buying something that the company at least made a few of its components.

And if android is complicated to use, its not its fault that it requires a person with a decent IQ to use it.

Also i assure, more people are moving from iphone to android than the other way around. and further to that, more people are taking up android than iphone.

And we do know the difference between widget and app right? they are two different things. And google market is growing far faster than the app store (will even go faster with the new emulator), this time next year the app store will be number 2.

And saying other phones look like the iphone is a joke. Thats like looking side on of the FG falcon and saying it was a copy of the ve commodore. Sure there are a few little things that are the same, size, door handles, but clearly they are different, especially the interior. So tell me how they are copying? i would really like to get your side of the story on this

 

dmt0328 posted a reply   
Australia

"tell us something that apple made first and you'll shut up"...

Shutting you up is not possible, because you are just on here seeking validation for your Generic, copycat of a phone...

How about this. Apple invented the current form factor and touch interface as you and i both know it today. Please show me the phones that samsung was regurgitating up in 2007. the f480? or the Omnia... very limited and prehistoric when compared to the iPhone. Not to mention that the iPhone took the touch screen to the next level and forced the copycats at samsung to innovate and at least put effort into their products rather than churning out phone after phone just for the sake of making a few dollars. Put quite simply most android using manufacturers lack innovation and if you can't see that apple, with their iPhone has changed the mobile industry, in both Phones and Tablets then you are honestly not even worth another second, and can go and waste Dunners Time instead of mine.
"How are they Copying"...
Well the answer to this is quite simple... iOS was released first and Android followed because it could see that the iPhone was light years ahead of any other manufacturer and saw an opportunity to create a competitor to apple because Samsung, LG and Moto simply put, suck at developing an OS. A simple analysis of the market will show you that it is MUCH easier to be a follower than an innovator because the ideas have already been created... they are available for copying... So in a way you are right, android is becoming the preferred OS, but it is by the virtue of Apple Brilliance and innovation, and certainly not from the crumby phone manufacturers that support the android OS. Android is a decent OS, but again it is (much like the manufacturers copy of the iPhone design) essentially utilising the innovations of apple, and since Apple has pretty much facilitated these changes for Android, Android doesn't have much work to to really but sit and wait...
The above principles apply to almost all tech in General. How many companies have copied the macbook pro design??? I'm sure the number is quite large, the island style keyboard?? the Massive Trackpad? (which, FYI nobody has really managed).

You can blab on all you like about Android, but i can see it for what it really is...a follower, and theres nothing wrong with that, but i just prefer companies which try to think outside the box and develop/perfect something innovative. The funny thing is if the iPhone wasn't developed, Android wouldn't even exist, yet here you are...on a tech forum, trying to argue androids supremacy.

Ill let you spot the irony yourself... (if you are capable of doing so

 

Spartan Jack 17 posted a reply   
Australia

And, guess who makes the iphone screen? Samsung! How can they copy their own products?!!


Sponsored Links
Smartphones

User Reviews / Comments  Samsung Galaxy Gio

  • nivek1960

    nivek1960

    "NIVEK60

    Actually purchased the phone and works very well compared to buddies I-Phones,and 4G phones that they paid 500 to 600 hundred dollars for maybe 400 Mhz of speed and a flash ,bu..."

  • MitchellT

    MitchellT

    "upgrade it to android 2.3.4 so much better user experience!"

  • MitchellT

    MitchellT

    "upgrade it to android 2.3.4 so much better user experience!"

Recently Viewed Products