Samsung PS42A450P1

By Ty Pendlebury on 07 May 2008

The Samsung PS42A450P1 is a 42-inch plasma which features 100Hz motion compensation and is capable of displaying 3D games and videos.

6.2

In a cinema in Los Angeles, 86 years ago, the first 3D feature film was shown to a paying audience. While almost no-one remembers The Power of Love now, it was the tentative steps of a technology which enjoyed its Golden Age during the 50's. Even Hitchcock filmed a 3D feature (in Dial M for Murder).

Samsung is one company that is trying to bring some of the magic back with its new 3D plasmas, the PS42A450 and the PS50A450.

Upside
We've seen 3D done before, and not particularly successfully in Zalman's gaming monitor. Samsung has attempted to alleviate the problems by incorporating an infrared emitter into the glasses that tells the system where you are and adjusts the 3D effect accordingly. No more playing around with PC drivers for hours.

Of course, there's one stumbling block which we'll discuss shortly — the 3D effect needs a PC to work. At present it's mostly games that are supported, though there is at least one Stereoscopic movie player available on the Net — this means you'll also need a stereoscopic video to watch it on. These are hard to come by.

Apart from the 3D functionality, the plasma sits in the company's budget Series 4 range and includes a 1024 by 768 resolution — the 50-inch has 1365 by 768 — plus a "true" 30,000:1 contrast ratio and three HDMI connections. Being a plasma, the PS42A450P1 also features several different technologies which Samsung says "ensures that no images are burned into your plasma panel".

Downside
We cannot convey to you in words how ugly the spectacles are that you need to enable the 3D effect. They look like they should be accompanied with a certificate for Licence 3 Butt Fusion Welding — and yes that's actually what they call it.

Major downside: not only do you need to connect your TV to a computer for 3D, but the computer needs an Nvidia graphics card (which most notebooks won't have) and the game needs to support it. As we found previously with the Zalman monitor, some games are more successful than others.

The 42-inch also has two other downsides: one, the resolution needs to downscale HD images due to its limited 1024 by 768, which could lead to reduced picture quality; and two, the TV only features an analog tuner.

Outlook
We don't see many people who buy these TVs actually using the 3D capability, especially given all the caveats involved, but it's an interesting value-add nonetheless.

Like anything, it'll be price that determines whether this TV is a good deal, especially if you need to buy the glasses separately. We expect pricing to be available closer to the June release date.

Topics: 3d, 42-inch, plasma, samsung, PS42A450P1, PS-42A450P1, series 4, 768, downside, needs

Comments (5)

  • ccron6 gave 10/10 on 01/07/2009 21:25 Report abuse

    my samsung plasma has never given me troubles i have had it since 2nd february and its now 2nd july, so 5 months and no problems it is good for its price i would recommend it for sure :)

    • Good: good picture, good sound, good warranty
    • Bad: only 2 av ports :(, sometimes tv will turn its self on and screen will be blank dont know if its supose to do so.
  • saj gave 1/10 on 27/01/2009 15:58 Report abuse

    Don%u2019t be fooled by Samsung! I am writing to express my disgust with the way I have been treated by Samsung After-sales service. I bought a Samsung Ps42A410 Plasma TV on the 30th of August 2008 and registered the TV for warranty. Four-months and 18 days later, on the 18th of January 2009, the screen just went blank. I called the 1300 362 603 number and was advised to drop it by Camtech - my local service agent. I did so at 9am on the 19th of January and was promised it was going to be investigated at latest 2-3 days later. I went to Camtech on the morning of 19th of January ( 3 days later) the TV was still lying at same place where I dropped it off - apparently the technician assigned took a day off. I advised Samsung and I was told that "it was just my bad luck that my 4 months old TV was faulty" and I would have to "wait for as long as it takes because it was not in their hands but that of the service agent. On Friday 23rd, I ranged Camtech, and they still haven't had a chance to assess the TV! I again rang Samsung and insisted to talk to a manager. I was again told that "it was my bad luck". However, Camtech will look at the TV on Friday afternoon and will keep me posted by latest Saturday 24th. Never happened. I rung Camtech this morning (27th of January) - still did not get a technician to look at it, parts have not been ordered. I spoke to Samsung and was told that " I will have to wait for as long at takes". I spoke to Harvey Norman Cannington %u2013where I bought the TV from. They spoke to Samsung to try and get them to see some sense but was told that %u201Cit%u2019s up to Camtech%u201D and it will have to take as long as it takes! Well, first of all, it is NOT MY BAD LUCK THAT A 4 MONTHS OLD PLASMA TV FAILS AFTER FOUR MONTHS! Secondly, IT IS NOT MY BAD LUCK THAT SAMSUNG SERVICE AGENT DO NOT HAVE PEOPLE TO ASSESS MY TV. It is ONLY POOR QUALITY EQUIPMENT AND POOR CUSTOMER SERVICE FROM SAMSUNG. On the other hand, what guarantee will I have that the TV won't fail again or fail on me once the warranty expires?! Don%u2019t make same mistake as I did!
    Overall: Poor quality. No customer service!

  • saj gave 3/10 on 19/01/2009 15:40 Report abuse

    Ty,
    I thought I made a good deal too when I bought it.

    • Bad: However, only after 4 months in use, the screen just went black and I was getting only sound out it and I had to send it for service. Would certainly NOT recommend it to anyone!
  • TCB gave 9/10 on 10/09/2008 10:30 Report abuse

    Ty

    I may be a little biased with the rating of this product but thats only because I just purchased it and we all know when you spend hard earned money on something you are more likely to give it a better rating.

    Having said that, I did spend a lot of time researching Plasma TV's and in the end it came down to two in my price range. The Panasonic TH-42PX80A and the Samsung PS42A450P1.

    Honestly, I couldn't tell the difference in picture between the two while looking at them side by side in the shop.

    In the end I picked the Samsung because it has 24 months warranty as opposed to 12 months for the Panasonic, it is a nicer looking TV, the menu system is heaps better.

    You will need to view the way the menus work on both but trust me, the Samsung menus are much cleaner and intuitive. Also when you go into a menu on the Samsung you can still see and hear the station you are watching behind them. The Panasonic menus hide the picture and turn the sound off.

    I don't know what TV you were viewing but mine has a built in DVB-T tuner so I get all the digital and analogue stations.
    I double checked the model number and yes it is the same as the one you reviewed.

    • Good: 24 months warranty
      Picture is fantastic
      Great menu system
    • Bad: Needs more Composite (AV) ports
  • Enterfrize gave 8/10 on 08/05/2008 13:34 Report abuse

    Dear Ty,

    I can't speak for the product itself, but I think this review didn't go deep enough. Hollywood is taking on 3D cinema in a big way thanks to 2:1 and 3:1 revenue compared to 2D offerings. You are correct to place great emphasis on stereoscopic 3D (S-3D) gaming because that is very exciting. We also have to credit the huge amount of growing pressure for this new 3D movie content to be equally displayed at home.

    On the gaming side, Electronic Arts via their Electronic Arts Korea division is already taking a serious interest in stereoscopic 3D (S-3D) as shown here:

    http://mtbs3d.com/cgi-bin/rss_interviews.cgi?news_id=40
    http://mtbs3d.com/cgi-bin/rss_interviews.cgi?news_id=52

    We are starting to see game developers implement native stereoscopic 3D support, and many of the leading game developers (e.g. Epic Games, Ubisoft, Turbine Games, etc.) have submitted titles for stereoscopic 3D review.

    For myself, I'm not interested in what the glasses look like. I'm interested in reading about how the content looks through the glasses. 2:1 and 3:1 Hollywood cinema revenue was never dependent on how good the eyewear looked.

    It would be good if you could amend your review with content experiences like S-3D movies, games, etc.

    Regardless, it is good to see CNET taking an interest in these exciting stereoscopic 3D technologies.

    Thanks in advance,

    Neil Schneider, President & CEO
    Meant to be Seen
    http://www.mtbs3D.com

    • Good: N/A
    • Bad: N/A

Post your own

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

Where to buy Samsung PS42A450P1

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder