Apple Boot Camp (beta)

Description:

Apple gives the people what they want: Windows on Macs. Geeks proved it could be done through a variety of complicated hacks and now Apple makes it a breeze with a free download. We take Boot Camp for a test run.

Users' rating:

9.5/10

Tags:

apple | beta | boot | camp | mac | operating | os | system | xp

Editor's note: We have updated this preview with more-comprehensive benchmark results. (10 April 2006)

Apple released Boot Camp today, a free download that lets you run Windows on an Intel-based Mac. The 83MB download is available as beta software, and Boot Camp will be included in Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard later this year. We don't, however, expect to see Windows preinstalled on Macs anytime soon (Apple makes it very clear it will not support Windows). Interest in running Windows on a Mac has been evident ever since Steve Jobs announced the Intel-based iMac this past January, and it reached a crescendo last month with various contests for finding a hack to run Windows on an Intel Mac. Boot Camp, therefore, isn't the first time the world will see Windows running on a Mac, but it certainly makes the process much easier.

We installed Boot Camp on the iMac Core Duo; the software will also work with the Mac Mini and the MacBook Pro. Before we could run the app, we first had to update our iMac to Mac OS X 10.4.6, followed by a quick firmware update. We were then prompted to burn a disc of Windows drivers (for the iMac Core Duo's video and audio adaptors, peripherals, wired and wireless networking adaptors and so on), which are included in the Boot Camp download. After ejecting our newly minted driver disc, Boot Camp then asked us how we'd like to partition our iMac's 250GB hard drive. The default was a paltry 5GB for Windows; we upped it to an even 100GB, then inserted a Windows XP Pro with Service Pack 2 disc. Note: You must supply your own copy of Windows; you can use either Home or Pro, but Apple's documentation states that it must include SP2. The Windows installation proceeded per its norm, the iMac restarted, and we were looking at the strange site of the glossy white iMac framing the familiar XP Bliss wallpaper. It's alive!

A quick scan of the Device Manager showed that we were a few drivers short of a full deck. We installed the contents of the driver disc that Boot Camp had us create, which filled in most, but not all, of the gaps. We were still missing a USB driver and a PCI driver, along with some unknowns. From our first pass with Windows on the iMac, however, the system appeared to be fully operational. We were able to connect to our LAN and the Internet and even play a game of Minesweeper.

What Boot Camp doesn't let you do is run both operating systems at the same time. You must shut down one before booting to the other. Whichever OS you had running last will boot upon the next start-up. To halt that from happening, simply hold down the Alt-Option key while the system powers on and after a few seconds, you'll be presented with a grey start screen with two images of hard drives: choose the one of the left for Mac OS or the one on the right for Windows.

Boot Camp also installs an icon labelled Startup Disk in the Control Panel in Windows and in the System Preferences window in Mac OS. It opens a window that lists the Mac OS and Windows XP partitions. Choose one to shut down the current OS you have running and boot to the other. Switching between the two operating systems was fast and easy. Also, Windows appeared to be stable; it crashed only once when we were investigating DirectX settings, not an unusual occurrence on any Windows-based PC.

There's more to this than playing Minesweeper on a Mac, of course. Aside from the wow factor, Boot Camp, especially when it becomes a standard feature of the Mac OS, should usher in a new era for the Mac platform. Though you'll need to pony up for a copy of Windows, your Mac will be able to run any software that its PC competitors can run, not too mention all the Apple apps that PCs can't run. With Boot Camp, for example, you can run the iLife apps and the latest 3D game, say, F.E.A.R., on the same system.

As surprising as the Boot Camp development might be, the performance results are decidedly boring. Given the Intel processor and motherboard, the iMac Core Duo's performance when running Windows was right about where we expected compared to other Windows PCs'. On CNET Labs' Photoshop CS test, it trailed dual-core PCs from Dell and HP, but only by a small percentage. We didn't expect it to top either of these systems, given their more powerful Pentium D 900-series desktop processors. Compared to the same iMac Core Duo system running Mac OS X, the system showed a large but not unexpected jump in performance with Photoshop. Where the iMac Core Duo in Mac OS X took 6.5 minutes to complete the test, because it must use the Rosetta translation software, the same system running Windows XP Pro took less than 3 minutes.

Adobe Photoshop CS test (in seconds)
(Lower times are better)
HP Pavilion Media Center TV m7360n
143 
Dell XPS 400
151 

We're also not shocked by the iTunes, video-encoding, and Doom 3 tests. As it was written with the Mac OS X in mind, iTunes has historically run slower on Windows PCs. The same holds true for the iMac hardware running Windows: the Windows partition on the iMac took 26 seconds longer to finish our test. Our Sorenson video-encoding test looks much better on the Windows partition than on the OS X side for the same reason the Photoshop results skewed in favour of Windows: Sorenson runs natively in Windows XP and is emulated via Rosetta in OS X.

Apple iTunes 4.7.1.30 MP3-encoding test (in seconds)
(Lower times are better)
Dell XPS 400
110 
HP Pavilion Media Center TV m7360n
124 


Sorenson Squeeze 4 video-encoding test (in minutes: seconds)
(Lower times are better)
Dell XPS 400
232 
HP Pavilion Media Center TV m7360n
262 

The release of Boot Camp doesn't change our opinion of the iMac as a gaming system. No matter which OS you run, its weak ATI Radeon X1600 graphics chip, which shares memory with the system itself, isn't going to deliver high frame rates. The iMac Core Duo performed better under Windows than under OS X (25.9 frames per second vs. an even less playable 16.2), but we still don't recommend it for serious 3D gaming.

Doom 3 (Custom Demo) (in fps)  (Higher scores are better)
Doom 3 1,024x768 4XAA 8XAF  
Dell XPS 400
46.6 
Apple iMac G5
11.7 
HP Pavilion Media Center TV m7360n
2.7 

System configurations:
Apple iMac Core Duo (Mac OS X)
Macintosh OS 10.4.4; 2.0GHz Intel Core Duo; 1GB DDR2 SDRAM 667MHz; 128MB ATI Radeon X1600 PCIe; 250GB Maxtor 7,200rpm Serial ATA hard drive

Apple Apple iMac Core Duo (Windows XP Pro) Windows XP Pro SP2; 2.0GHz Intel Core Duo; 1GB DDR2 SDRAM 667MHz; 128MB ATI Radeon X1600 PCIe; 250GB Maxtor 7,200rpm Serial ATA hard drive

Apple iMac G5 2.10GHz
Macintosh OS 10.4; PowerPC G5 2.10GHz; 512MB DDR2 SDRAM 533MHz; 128MB ATI Radeon X600XT PCIe; 250GB Serial ATA hard drive

Dell XPS 400 (Viiv)
Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005; 3.2GHz Intel Pentium D 940; Intel 945P chipset; 1,024MB DDR SDRAM 533MHz; 256MB Nvidia GeForce 6800 (PCIe); two Maxtor 250GB 7,200rpm Serial ATA; integrated Intel (RAID 1)

HP Pavilion Media Center TV m7360n
Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005; 2.8GHz Intel Pentium D 920; Intel 945G chipset; 2,048MB DDR2 SDRAM 533MHz; 256MB Nvidia GeForce 6200 SE (PCIe); Maxtor 300GB 7,200rpm Serial ATA

Editors' note: Some models used for comparison purposes may not be retailing in your country. Please check with your local vendor for availability.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

dc6361
29/06/2006, 05:44 PM

rating
9
/10

Mac OS X capable of Win XP?!

I have owned a 2005 Imac G5 for about 6 Months now and i am deeply impressed. I have been a long time Windows user ever since Windows 95 came out, right through to XP and have never personally touched an imac/mac/apple before, thinking they were complicated and a waste of time and money. How wrong was i?! Now that i am deeply amazed and impressed about how capable the G5 is and the OS is (Mac OS X), it leaves me wondering what could keep me amazed? One word...GAMES! Sure, there are plenty of Mac games out there but they don't pack the punch that the Windows compatible games do. So here comes Bootcamp to the rescue! Not only can you run Windows Applications on a Mac, games can be installed and played too! And thats what i have been preaching about! I am a heavy games user, and now since i have given my old PC up for the newer and better Imac G5, i can finally play those great 3D racing, shootem up, adventure games that EVERYONE LOVES!

I have only one question though- When Bootcamp "Officially" comes out of development, will it be available to download for free or for a cost, or will you have to buy a newer OS to be able to install it? For Example, when the newer version Windows Media Player was available in 2002 people had to buy Windows XP to have it installed on their PC. Will this be the case for Bootcamp?

Pros: Come On Guys! (And Girls...) This would be one hell of a thing for a Mac to have! You could play all those great PC games that you wouldn't be able to play on a Mac and use all those Windows applications without needing to buy Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac OS X! And on a much more powerful machine! (Imac G5 for example)

Cons: Sure... on a iMac G5 with plenty of memory and hard disk space, games and applications might run well... Maybe even better than PCs, (And that would be a hell of a thing!) but what about older macs? How would, for example, Windows Media Player run while watching videos on an older Mac?

Report offensive comment


12/04/2006, 01:43 AM

Well why the @^%# not?

I'd never use it, I love my Mac OS too much, but still, fantastic to have the CHOICE out there, yeh? I can run Windows or Linux on my PC, and I'm sure Mac OS will follow. Why not be able to run Mac and Windows, and I'm sure Linux will follow, on my Mac?!
FUN GEEK TOYS!

Report offensive comment


12/04/2006, 12:14 AM

Why not?

Windows users get all the virii b/c there are more windows users than OS/x. Mac hardware has very tight specs to work w/ OS X, unlike windows or linux which tries to be everything to everyone. If everyone used Macs with OS/x, then the virus people would just be Apple parasites. I want this so I can get a nice piece of hardware that runs Pro Tools like nobody's business, and still can use all my excellent games and Office software. Why be hostile to extra choice and more hardware options?? And OS/x just looks so pleasant and runs quite smoothly.

Report offensive comment

Fbdklw
11/04/2006, 03:12 PM

Hey I'm a convert

Like it or not, I converted back in October. However Bootcamp now allows me to use all of the new Mac OSX tools on a new Mac book, and still run the silly office app that my company uses via XP, as well I can play a few Windows based games. So, I can Ebay off my Windows Laptop, and the Imac I started with and Upgrade to One machine to do all of these things. Quite the contrary to doubters, I think this diplomatic approach makes Apple look great.

Report offensive comment

Troy
11/04/2006, 03:02 PM

It's about time the minority got converted

Report offensive comment

GW Gold Smith
10/04/2006, 09:23 PM

Windows on Mac? No, thank you.

It is well-known that Windows users have problems with viruses and Mac users have few or none. The loss of productivity due to viruses is unacceptable in today's business environment. Why haven't Windows users demanded better protection?

Report offensive comment


08/04/2006, 04:55 AM

mac os x

mac os x is so much better then windows i don't want that on mac

Report offensive comment

  • Leave a comment

All fields marked with * are required

What do you think

Rate this product:

Need help? Read our guidelines for what each number rating represents.

Your e-mail will not be displayed

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars.

  • Sydney's Chatswood to get Apple store

  • Tweaking OS X

  • Advanced Mac keyboard shortcuts for power users

  • Apple Spaces: Separate work and play

  • Free Speed: Make your Mac faster

  • Apple putting Snow Leopard on crash diet?

  • Photos: Bill Gates, a photo biography

  • Apple previews OS X 10.6: Snow Leopard

  • XP on your desktop till 2010, if it's cheap

More articles »

Find the right software

Brand
  • Multiple options can be selected

    The Explain Series

    • Microsoft Windows Vista SP1

      Microsoft Windows Vista SP1

      Microsoft pushes its first service pack for Vista out the door. Is it a salvation, a non-event or a flop?

    • Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard

      Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard

      The grace of Leopard's interface enhancements makes productivity more pleasurable with a Mac, as more than 300 functional and fun features top off this update.

    • Ubuntu 7.04

      Ubuntu 7.04

      Ubuntu is very user-friendly but not right for everyone. Oddly, both casual and advanced users will find this operating system wonderful, while day-to-day users may rail against Ubuntu's incompatibility with certain popular software applications.

    • Windows Mobile 6

      Windows Mobile 6

      Though it doesn't offer earth-shattering new features and interface issues remain, Windows Mobile 6 brings a collection of noteworthy improvements that makes its mobile devices easier to use and equips mobile professionals with more robust productivity tools.

    • Microsoft Vista Home Basic

      Microsoft Vista Home Basic

      If you're currently happy with Windows XP SP2, it is not worth rushing out to purchase Vista Home Basic. On the other hand, if you need a new computer right now, Windows Vista is stable enough for everyday use.

    More reviews »

    Membership benefits

    Win prizes and other promotion benefits

    Win prizes and other promotion benefits

    As a CNET.com.au member, you're eligible to enter and win any prizes on our site. Sign up for a free CNET.com.au membership now!