Join CNET.com.au: Receive free newsletters, post to forums and win prizes. Sign up now!

AFL teams a danger on the Web: Google

By Ella Morton on 26 February 2008

Tags: afl | football | google | malware | security | site | flag | warning | club | google search

Google has flagged the Web sites of 10 Australian Football League (AFL) clubs as potentially dangerous, preventing visitors from accessing the teams' sites via the search engine.

A Google search for Australian football clubs such as the Sydney Swans and the St Kilda Saints leads to the words "This site may harm your computer" being displayed beneath the search result.

The warning: Click to enlarge.

Users who click on the AFL site link are diverted to a Google Help Center page about malicious software. Despite the warnings, there are no apparent security problems with the team sites.

In order to access the football sites -- which are all hosted by Telstra's BigPond -- would-be visitors must type the URL directly into their browser's address bar.

"That's the killer: you've got to cut and paste the link into the browser bar," said Roger Thompson, Chief Research Officer at AVG Technologies, who discovered the Google warning following a blocked attempt to access the St Kilda site. "Joe Average is not going to be bothered doing that."

The flagging is part of Google's measures to identify dangerous sites and prevent Web surfers from accessing malware-infested pages.

According to the FAQ page of Stopbadware.org -- an organisation that works with Google to test suspicious pages -- many sites flagged by the search engine have been victims of a hacking attack or have hosted third-party content that distributed malware.

"Probably at some stage [hackers] managed to hack into those sites, the common thread being AFL," said Thompson in a telephone interview.

"The slightly amusing thing is that they're all clean now and yet they're still being outed as bad."

A Google representative said the team sites were flagged as "compromised" on 20 February.

"We are continuing to monitor the infected sites and will remove the flag when our standard procedures indicate that they're safe," the spokesperson said.

"Any Webmaster who wants to seek a review of a warning attributed to their site can do so very easily at any time ... no request for review has been received at this time."

BigPond Group Manager of Corporate Affairs, Craig Middleton, explained the security issue in an e-mail: "The Google search service incorrectly identified a corrupted data file as 'malware' and automatically applied the erroneous warning to the club sites when accessed via Google search," he wrote.

"This is very regrettable because there was at no stage any threat or risk to users. The sites were neither 'infected' or 'compromised'. The file which caused this was removed last Friday morning. We hope few AFL fans were inconvenienced by this Google 'service'."

Of the 16 AFL club Web sites, 10 have been flagged as harmful, while the other six (Fremantle, West Coast, Adelaide, Collingwood, Essendon and the Western Bulldogs) are regarded by Google as clean.

P
26/02/2008 05:28 PM

It should be blocked for having so much flash, javascript, etc as to be giant crock of a web site.

Report offensive content

football_hooligans
27/02/2008 01:24 AM

I'm a little disappointed. I thought the AFL sites would be blocked to prevent people being exposed to the players, who continually show themselves to be a bunch of complete morons.

Report offensive content

Matthias101
01/03/2008 12:24 PM

Its more likely Googleites want society to be less degraded by the horrible nature of football.... Nothing wrong with the sites security at all.

Report offensive content

bobo
07/06/2008 05:21 PM

all afl should be blocked because wayne carery is a wayne car

Report offensive content

  • Leave a comment

All fields marked with * are required

What do you think

Your e-mail will not be displayed

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars.


  • News

  • Features

  • Oi!

  • Must read

  • Free Speed: Make your Mac faster

  • Apple fixes security issues with QuickTime 7.5

  • Cyberattack alert service helps Aussies Stay Smart

  • Bosses can snoop on staff e-mails 'to fight terror'

  • 'Lighter' Norton 360 V2.0 takes aim at the Web

  • AFL teams a danger on the Web: Google

  • Secure Internet stored in your pocket

  • Exploits plague Adobe Reader and Acrobat

  • Apple updates iPhoto 7.1.2 with a security fix

More news »

Find the right software

Brand
  • Multiple options can be selected

    • Ad-Aware 2008

      Ad-Aware 2008

      This year's update to user favourite Ad-Aware is quite a significant overhaul, and the result is faster scan times and a new interface.

    • AVG Internet Security 8.0

      AVG Internet Security 8.0

      AVG Internet Security 8.0 provides strong protection against malicious Web sites, but its full-system scans sometimes tax system resources and produce false positives.

    • Sunbelt CounterSpy 2.0

      Sunbelt CounterSpy 2.0

      In its first appearance, CounterSpy was the only antispyware product that correctly identified every piece of spyware in our current active-detection test.

    • Ad-Aware 2007

      Ad-Aware 2007

      Lavasoft Ad-Aware 2007 came in dead last in our CNET antispyware testing. Ad-Aware failed to detect half of the test spyware, and unlike nine out of the 10 other antispyware apps we reviewed in December 2007, left behind traces for all but one spyware.

    • Norton Internet Security 2008

      Norton Internet Security 2008

      While Symantec's protection is solid, the overall user experience within Norton Internet Security 2008 could be much, much better. Not all the features work together and use fewer system resources.

    More reviews »

    Membership benefits

    Create a personalised homepage

    Create a personalised homepage

    Choose your interests from our 16 categories and only see articles relevant to you. Sign up for a free CNET.com.au membership now!