Sony Handycam HDR-XR200V

By Derek Fung on 31 March 2009

It's the active image stabilisation system that finally makes shooting lengthy handheld movies or on-the-go videos a viable option, which elevates this camera from average to good.

Editor's rating:8.1 User rating:5.4
  • Good: Active image stabilisation removes all shake, bar earthquakes • Good, if not great, image quality • GPS geotagging • Did we already mention the image stabilisation?
  • Bad: How about 24Mbps recording Sony? • 4-megapixel claim is a lie •
  • Specs: Hard Disk, Flash Memory • 1920 x 1080 • See more specifications
  • RRP: AU$1,999.00

Design

Reverend Lovejoy from The Simpsons once preached about the nine tenants of constancy; one can only imagine that a smattering of Sony's camcorder designers were in attendance that day, as the new Sony Handycam HDR-XR200V is remarkably like the mid-range high-def Handycams that have come before it, the SR10 and the SR5.

Sure the colours and some of the minor details have changed, but the essentials are the same. The XR200V now has a much darker hue, with dark metal adorning the lens ring and the top of the camera. As before, all the covers, especially the one hiding the hotshoe, slide back and away with the smoothness and alacrity of a device that costs as much as 316 medium double cheeseburger meals. Weighing about 470g with the supplied battery, the XR200V feels solid and weighty in the hand.

The major changes, if you could call them that, are a hand grip that no longer rises towards the rear and the combination power/mode dial being told that "it's time to go". With the power button now residing on the inside of the LCD's screen cubby hole, the Quick On button has also been given the heave-ho. The XR200V switches on automatically whenever you flip the screen out. It switches off again automatically when you close the screen unless, of course, you're recording; start up takes a squeak under three seconds.

Measuring 2.7 inches across diagonally, the flip-out touchscreen LCD features the same 211k pixel unit seen on the SR10 and is the only method setting up the camera. Configuration and settings are still split between two different menu structures. More commonly used settings, such as white balance, manual focus, macro mode, scene selection, recording quality and the like, reside in a set of menus accessed by an on-screen settings button that resides in the bottom right corner of the screen. Other, less commonly used settings, such as switching between HD and SD recording, image stabilisation mode, X.V. Colour and so forth, reside in the config menu accessed via the home menu in the top left corner.

Features

Residing in the LCD screen's hidey-hole are a clutch of buttons familiar to Handycam users — display, playback, infrared Nightshot mode, one-touch disc burning, and an Easy mode that removes almost all manual control. Joining them is a toggle switch for the GPS antenna; with the antenna on videos automatically tagged with your GPS location, although, like the majority of car sat nav systems, this feature only works when you're outdoors. The antenna's inclusion allows for video searching by location, in addition to the existing keyframe, face and recording sequence based searches. Any geotagged video is displayed as a red pin on a world map, which includes major roads and location names for the US, Canada, the UK, western Europe, Japan and, of course, Australia and New Zealand. Pity then that this map mode is hidden behind a maze of menu items.

Like many of its ilk the standard 5.1-channel surround sound mic is highly sensitive to the merest breath of air. Mini-HDMI, AV and component out ports are also provided so audio visual masterpieces can be quickly reviewed on a TV although, to our continued chagrin, no mini-HDMI cable is provided.

We have mixed feelings about Sony doing away with the dock used in previous models. On the one hand it was a nice way of reducing cable clutter or loss, but with most of its ports and functions already available on the camera, it was a wee bit redundant. We're less ambiguous about the now departed remote control — hooray! Features we'd deem mandatory in a AU$2000 camera, such as an electronic viewfinder and Sony's excellent manual control dial, are all notable for their absence, however.

There are a few features nicked from still cameras, such as face detection and smile shutter. The latter, with its ability to automatically snap still photos of anyone smiling while you're recording video, seems rather well suited to the realm of camcorders. A 30-day trial of Sony's AU$289 Vegas Movie Studio 9 Platinum video editing suite is included as part of the package, and is an adequate alternative for Cecil B. DeMille-wannabes unwilling to fork out for either Adobe Premiere or Apple's Final Cut.

Performance

As with almost every other self-respecting camcorder these days, the XR200V can record both still images and video on to removable flash memory — in this case Sony's proprietary MemoryStick Pro Duos — as well as its 120GB hard disk. Capturing videos at 1920x1080i, the hard disk is capable of holding up to 870 minutes of footage at the highest quality setting. Like all hard-disk camcorders though, the battery will run out of juice well before the hard disk fills up, with the supplied battery rated at 100 minutes.

Sharing a 2.3-megapixel sensor (only 1.5 megapixels of which are used while recording) with the HDR-XR100, as well as the outgoing SR10, video quality from XR200V is good but not quite as pin sharp as we'd expect from a camera retailing for the best part of AU$2k. Part of the reason for this may lie with the less than stellar 16Mbps bitrate, well behind the 24Mbps rate offered by Canon. Colour reproduction is OK, although probably a tad too muted for most tastes. Barely qualifying as passable are the XR200V's still photos. Despite boasting "4-megapixel" resolution, image quality is little better than a standard camera phone's. Worse though is Sony insistence on interpolating stills up to the required megapixel spec — a little trick that, in the annals of tech trickery, ranks alongside digital zoom.

By far the biggest selling point of this camcorder is that it is the cheapest Handycam available with Sony's new active image stabilisation system — dubbed Optical Active Steadyshot, for which the packaging proudly boasts it's up to 10 times easier to hold in your hand. We shot viewable handheld footage on foot and on a bus, situations that would normally render video unwatchable, even for the most die-hard fans of The Blair Witch Project — check out our video review for a demonstration. While at maximum zoom (15x optical) handheld video bordered on actually being watchable.

Sticklers will notice a slightly unnatural feeling to the active image stabilisation system. For instance, if you pan across a scene and stop abruptly, the image will appear to float for a split second before coming to a rest. This quibble aside though, the new image stabilisation system is a boon, as it removes all but the biggest of twitches, it allows lengthy handheld videos to be shot without the fear that viewers will need a doggy bag for company.

Conclusion

It's the active image stabilisation system that finally makes shooting lengthy handheld movies or on-the-go videos a viable option, which elevates this camera from average to good. If you intend to attach your video camera to a tripod for a majority of the time and can live without the GPS, there are sharper, and potentially cheaper, options out there though.

Topics: sony, high definition, hdmi, handycam, HDR-XR200V, hdd, exmor r, video, camera, stabilise

Comments (18)

  • don1 gave a review on 16/08/2009 22:01 Report abuse

    This is just a reply to Morgan. I am happy that you're satisfied with your x900s indoor performance. But I think if you shoot in the highest video quality that your camera allows and display it in full hi def (not 576 or 720) but 1080, then you'll see exactly what I am talking about and how poor the x900 performs indoors.

  • filcon gave 8/10 on 16/08/2009 09:10 Report abuse

    • Good: Good light shooting - excellent results
    • Bad: Hand hold position ergonomics

    My wife and I have just purchased this little pack of works, and have found it to be quite a good performer. It is only a little over 1 week old, so there are may of the features we are still learning. By the way, we didn't pay anything like $2000!! Picked it up from Bing Lee for a negotiated $1570, so I guess that puts it into a more realistic price range...about the same as we paid for our very first Sony Video8 camera in 1991!! I'm not quite sure why the reviewer didn't like the remote control (We're less ambiguous about the now departed remote control — hooray!)...In fact ours was supplied with the remote and I have found it to be very useful in both recording and playback. There seems to be a lot said about the noise of indoor shooting with this model. Well I have been into photography for more than 50 years now, and one of the things I have learned is that you shoot in sufficient light...turn the light switches on or use a movie light! I have found that the noise level in a well lit room is quite acceptable. If I want to shoot in the dark I will use the IR night switch! All in all, after 1 week and not a lot of use of this camera, we are quite happy so far. No doubt there will be some things we might not like as we get used to using it, but point me to a perfect consumer camera package and I'll get it!! I really don't believe you will find one out there though!! Fairly well done Sony!

  • Morgan gave a review on 14/08/2009 16:10 Report abuse

    But the Sony HDR500 is $300 more, you would hope that it performs better indoors. The GZ-X900 is good enough for me indoors.

  • don1 gave a review on 10/08/2009 23:07 Report abuse

    I actually have the Sony HDR500VE. Sorry thought that this was a review for that model. Besides the lack of manual features, I have nothing but praise for this model. GPS tagging a gimmick though. And in regards to the X900, the playback in not just low level but average indoor light was just abysmal to say the least. It was just unwatchable. No problems with HDR500VE. Although I did find that the X900 performed brilliantly outdoors. The slow motion feature is just a gimmick, can only record a few seconds. Didn't find the stills anything to comment about. The only thing good about the x900 is the look, compactness and outdoor performance. But unless you plan on recording just outdoors than don't make the same mistake I did.

  • Morgan gave 2/10 on 08/08/2009 12:00 Report abuse

    • Good: Reasonable OIS and 120GB capacity
    • Bad: Grainy and pale on the colours

    I disagree with Don1. I have a JVC X900 and it leaves the XR200 for dead. The colours are realistic, the camcorder is more compact, it takes real 9MP stills,it has slow motion record and outdoors it leaves the rest for dead. The XR200 just looked too pale on the colours and the colour accuracy on the XR200 is slightly off. The XR200 is also grainy indoors. All camcorders do when under extreme low light conditions.

  • don1 gave 9/10 on 08/08/2009 01:01 Report abuse

    • Good: goog all round performance
    • Bad: expensive

    I found the user interface and the menu system easy to navigate. Low light performance is actually quite good compared to that of other camcorders the same price. Tested the canon and the panasonic equivalant and they were both much more noisy and grainy in low light. Don't know what the other users are talking about. Actually bought the JVC x900. Returned it straight away due to the lack of ability to record indoors. Picture was so grainy and unwatchable. For all round performance and ease of use stick with the Sony.

  • Nick gave a review on 30/05/2009 00:28 Report abuse

    Too expensive

  • Tony T gave 1/10 on 15/05/2009 12:44 Report abuse

    • Good: OIS,120GB HDD capacity
    • Bad: Terrible stills, weak colours,noisy grainy picture when recording indoors.

    Not totally impressed. I saw one in a store and I believe it is over priced for what it delivers. The OIS was good but the image quality was average and the colours looked pale. I wouldn't pay $1999 for this.

  • Mick gave 2/10 on 05/05/2009 12:50 Report abuse

    The stills look terrible with this camcorder.The OIS is good and the picture looks allright when outdoors. Indoor recording could be better.I found it performed average when indoors.

  • Bill G gave 3/10 on 04/05/2009 13:55 Report abuse

    For $2000 not worth it, very average picture quality for a HD camcorder.My findings were the same as you Simon when I saw instore.

Post your own

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 and A..F

You must read and type the 6 chars within 0..9 & A..F

Submit

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Connect

The Explain Series

Where to buy Sony Handycam HDR-XR200V

See all options »

Must read

Advanced search

Product finder

Recently viewed products