US Supreme Court rules against file swapping
By John Borland, CNET News.com on 28 June 2005
The US Supreme Court has handed movie studios and record labels a sweeping victory against file swapping, ruling that peer-to-peer companies such as Grokster could be held responsible for the copyright piracy on their networks.
In a unanimous decision issued Monday, the nine justices said companies that build businesses with the active intent of encouraging copyright infringement should be held liable for their customers' illegal actions.
"We hold that one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement," Justice David Souter wrote in the majority opinion.
The decision comes as a surprisingly strong victory for copyright companies and stands to reshape an Internet landscape in which file swapping has become commonplace.
The ruling will give the recording industry and Hollywood immediate ammunition to file lawsuits against other file-trading companies. It could also be a boon for legal music services such as Apple Computer's iTunes, which could see their strongest competitor -- freely downloadable songs -- driven further underground.
It won't immediately shut down access to the trading networks, however. The court's ruling sends the case back to the lower courts, which will review the evidence against Grokster and co-defendant StreamCast in the light of Monday's decision.
Record labels and movie studios immediately hailed the decision as an unambiguous victory.
"The most important message from today's historic decision is that progress and innovation do not have to come at the expense of recording artists, songwriters and the people who make their living in the entertainment industry," Warner Music Group CEO Edgar Bronfman said in a statement. "This important decision will allow artists and the creative community to prosper side by side with the technology industry."
The peer-to-peer companies involved warned that the high court had opened the floodgates to litigation against a wide variety of technology companies, but said that they would continue to distribute their software and that they expected to be cleared of any wrongdoing.
"We are confident that it will be proven that Morpheus does not promote or encourage copyright infringement," said StreamCast Chief Executive Officer Michael Weiss. "We're staying in this for the fight. We're going to continue to innovate and come out with new products."
Topics: network, peer-to-peer, grokster, labels, swapping, file, record, piracy, court, supreme, rule, movie, studios, p2p
Related Articles
P2P rivals flock to BitTorrent
A new hope for BitTorrent?
eXeem opens new file-swapping doors
All I want for Christmas is a legal music service
Comments
-
CNET Editorial 28/06/2005
Be the first to comment on this story!
Post your own comment
Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.
ConnectMust read
-
Australian music download services compared
If you're keen to boost your music collection without stepping away from...
-
Lost: Finding the missing in iTunes
If you reorganise the music on your hard drive, iTunes will lose sight of...
-
Australian court rules against MP3 link site
Judges say now-defunct MP3s4free.net violated the law by linking to...
-
iTunes hacks
We'll show you how to stream your iTunes library wirelessly throughout the...
-
DIY: How to burn an audio CD
CNET's step-by-step guide to freeing all the music stored on your PC by...






